<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links for 01 May 2009 through 07 May 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/daily_links/daily_links_20090507/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/daily_links/daily_links_20090507/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 21:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/daily_links/daily_links_20090507/#comment-19637</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 23:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=4143#comment-19637</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Sean the Blogonaut:&lt;/strong&gt; People do occasionally report problems with Ustream -- extreme lag or buffering failures -- but I haven&#039;t investigated further because those problems can be caused by a bottleneck anywhere between the user and Ustream&#039;s servers.

In all of this, bandwidth is the key. You &lt;em&gt;must&lt;/em&gt; have an ADSL2+ or cable connection, or Telstra&#039;s Next G for a mobile link (and even then, it needs to be tuned for HSUPA rather than HSDPA). Anything else will fail. Ustream&#039;s 320 x 240 pixel default requires a recommended minimum 400kb/s uplink speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Sean the Blogonaut:</strong> People do occasionally report problems with Ustream &#8212; extreme lag or buffering failures &#8212; but I haven&#8217;t investigated further because those problems can be caused by a bottleneck anywhere between the user and Ustream&#8217;s servers.</p>
<p>In all of this, bandwidth is the key. You <em>must</em> have an ADSL2+ or cable connection, or Telstra&#8217;s Next G for a mobile link (and even then, it needs to be tuned for HSUPA rather than HSDPA). Anything else will fail. Ustream&#8217;s 320 x 240 pixel default requires a recommended minimum 400kb/s uplink speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean the Blogonaut</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/daily_links/daily_links_20090507/#comment-19616</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean the Blogonaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 03:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=4143#comment-19616</guid>
		<description>You might want to check out Tokbox in the near future.  They can video conference up to 20 people at a time apparently and they intend to offer the ability to record conferences as well.

I did look at Mogulus before I came across ustream.  I had issues originally with watching shows (lag etc) but that might have been a once off.  If you are going to use remote producers outside of major metropolitan areas speeds may be a problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to check out Tokbox in the near future.  They can video conference up to 20 people at a time apparently and they intend to offer the ability to record conferences as well.</p>
<p>I did look at Mogulus before I came across ustream.  I had issues originally with watching shows (lag etc) but that might have been a once off.  If you are going to use remote producers outside of major metropolitan areas speeds may be a problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/daily_links/daily_links_20090507/#comment-19530</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 00:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=4143#comment-19530</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@deanlk:&lt;/strong&gt; My thoughts exactly. Mogulus seems perfect for integrating inputs from all over into the one player, including live shows and pre-recorded and pre-programmed sequences. I intend speaking with Nick Hodge this coming week to see how we build upon what we&#039;re already doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@deanlk:</strong> My thoughts exactly. Mogulus seems perfect for integrating inputs from all over into the one player, including live shows and pre-recorded and pre-programmed sequences. I intend speaking with Nick Hodge this coming week to see how we build upon what we&#8217;re already doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @deanlk</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/daily_links/daily_links_20090507/#comment-19527</link>
		<dc:creator>@deanlk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 23:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=4143#comment-19527</guid>
		<description>Just went poking around Mogulus.  Looks pretty cool. With the live co-production features, you could team up with Mr Hodge and do really swish show handovers &amp; share the load of other parts of the production to remote producers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just went poking around Mogulus.  Looks pretty cool. With the live co-production features, you could team up with Mr Hodge and do really swish show handovers &amp; share the load of other parts of the production to remote producers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

