It amazes me that many people describe Hitler “literally” as a monster. They are dreaming…

National Socialism is “evil” by present standards because it’s actually honest (albeit the media has frabricated its so called war-crimes and make it dispicable even to noble persons who would otherwise be drawn toward it) therefore abrasive against the degenerate morals that have accumulated in the genetic fabric of the masses – the most degenerate lot of which is empowered by a Jewish elite, as the Jews’ emphasis on “equal rights” and anti-aristocratic nonsense exalts the weaklings and encourages their over reproduction – via government incentives – and “special interest” influence in this wretched democratic system.

What good can come of this? What good HAS come of this, aside from momentary materialistic gain, alas, a vain ‘pro’ which is but a ‘con’ in disguise?

Cosmpolitan is a bad thing? Huh? You want to limit yourself to one tiny part of the world’s possibilities?

What are you afraid of, Jake? Why does a world of “cosmopolitan” possibilities scare you? Did something happen to you?

Did the NSDAP have control of German media? Of course, and why shouldn’t they have, til then it had insidiously fallen into the clutches of a foreign body that used it for their own selfish aims, to subversively spite the Fatherland into an uprooted, folk-less, cosmopolitan, subjugated state of workerbees. I read a great comment on Youtube yesterday concerning NS Germany & Hitler I’m going to post now.

“Placing Jews in camps because they declared war on Germany ( March 24, 1933 ) was kindness. If Stalin had run Germany on March 24, 1933, he would have wiped out every Jew in 6 months with one bullet each. Hitler was exceedingly respectful and patient. Jews as well as Catholic died inthe camps from Typhus, but that WAS not a holocaust. The Jews were open traitors, and Hitler had a duty to protect 70,000,000 non Jews in Germany.”

@Jake: I’ll leave your comment about the image being homoerotic pass, since tastes vary. I don’t find the image the least bit erotic myself. It’s just a man standing in a neutral pose. But if you find it erotic that’s your business. Each to their own.

What intrigues me more is that you find the image “demeaning”. How? It’s just Hitler dressed in different clothes — clothes of quite neutral fashionability.

@Bob Fairlane: Here’s a list of every TIME Person of the Year, since you’d rather “think” things are true rather than look them up. I don’t understand the point you’re trying to make.

Those who lie are worse than the defamatory picture they paint of great men; and worse than the bad men who they depict as great.

Manipulators, cancer of humanity, permitted by their hateful religion to lie in order to acquire a superabundance of power and preponderance over their goyim “cattle”.

I remember watching an interview with David Oldfield of One Nation some time ago, and thinking that he was suave, well spoken, charismatic, sophisticated and charming – and mad as a cut snake. It occured to me at the time that that’s probably exactly how someone like Hitler had managed to get the popular support he did, and that it was time to stop One Nation before we went down the same path again. I think that we were quite lucky that it was the politically naive Hanson and not Oldfield leading that party, but in the end the Howard government was willing to do their dirty work under the guise of a less radical conservatism. And now that we appear to have a more reasonable government, it is no time to let our guard down.