<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Criminal profiling a load of old bunk?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/criminal_profiling_bunk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/criminal_profiling_bunk/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/criminal_profiling_bunk/#comment-8943</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 03:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/criminal_profiling_bunk/#comment-8943</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Richard:&lt;/strong&gt; Thanks for that, nice to have the suspicions confirmed.

Once I really did freak someone out by "profiling" them after having met them for all of 5 minutes. I picked up enough in those few minutes to be able to go for some high-likelihood comments, which made them suitably gullible, and the rest was pretty standard cold-reading tricks.

Maybe I should go for a job in law enforcement...

Maybe after saying that I should get my head read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Richard:</strong> Thanks for that, nice to have the suspicions confirmed.</p>
<p>Once I really did freak someone out by &#8220;profiling&#8221; them after having met them for all of 5 minutes. I picked up enough in those few minutes to be able to go for some high-likelihood comments, which made them suitably gullible, and the rest was pretty standard cold-reading tricks.</p>
<p>Maybe I should go for a job in law enforcement&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe after saying that I should get my head read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/criminal_profiling_bunk/#comment-8941</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/criminal_profiling_bunk/#comment-8941</guid>
		<description>Sorry, that should be 'all *successful* homicide investigations' etc.  PIMF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, that should be &#8216;all *successful* homicide investigations&#8217; etc.  PIMF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/criminal_profiling_bunk/#comment-8940</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/criminal_profiling_bunk/#comment-8940</guid>
		<description>This is a long-overdue article.  'Profiling' is a pseudoscience - file it alongside water divining and copper bracelets for rheumatism.

I've spent a few years in law enforcement.  One mob I used to work for had a profiler - basically because it was something they'd seen on TV, and because a chauvinistic police force could be seen to place a token woman in a high-profile position.  She was trained in the USA at horrendous cost to the taxpayer.  She got to go on a lot of junkets, had a very comfortable office (with framed certificates, always a bad sign), and displayed near-psychopathic levels of arrogance.

The punchline: as far as I am aware, she was not responsible for one single successful investigation.  

All homicide investigations in this state have been resolved through a combination of painstaking data analysis, forensic work, and targeted surveillance.  

Still, I see no decline in the popularity of novels, films and TV in the 'profiler' genre.  I suppose it's because an emotional and intuitive character is more 'exciting' than a skilled and methodical one, no matter how poorly it reflects reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a long-overdue article.  &#8216;Profiling&#8217; is a pseudoscience - file it alongside water divining and copper bracelets for rheumatism.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spent a few years in law enforcement.  One mob I used to work for had a profiler - basically because it was something they&#8217;d seen on TV, and because a chauvinistic police force could be seen to place a token woman in a high-profile position.  She was trained in the USA at horrendous cost to the taxpayer.  She got to go on a lot of junkets, had a very comfortable office (with framed certificates, always a bad sign), and displayed near-psychopathic levels of arrogance.</p>
<p>The punchline: as far as I am aware, she was not responsible for one single successful investigation.  </p>
<p>All homicide investigations in this state have been resolved through a combination of painstaking data analysis, forensic work, and targeted surveillance.  </p>
<p>Still, I see no decline in the popularity of novels, films and TV in the &#8216;profiler&#8217; genre.  I suppose it&#8217;s because an emotional and intuitive character is more &#8216;exciting&#8217; than a skilled and methodical one, no matter how poorly it reflects reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
