<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So this is human sexuality?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:17:52 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/#comment-13914</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1714#comment-13914</guid>
		<description>For those of you keeping score at home, in its first full month online (August 2008) this page attracted 5337 page views, according to my web server logs. Oh, how I love the Internet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you keeping score at home, in its first full month online (August 2008) this page attracted 5337 page views, according to my web server logs. Oh, how I love the Internet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/#comment-13666</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1714#comment-13666</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a joke, peeps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a joke, peeps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/#comment-13661</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 23:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1714#comment-13661</guid>
		<description>Tell you what -- the internet&#039;s sure brought golden showers out of Germany and right into the mainstream these days. I understand even the Catholic &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.familylife.com.au/&quot;&gt;Family Life&lt;/a&gt; movement gives it the tacit nod, when enjoyed between monogamous husbands and wives in the act of procreation.

Jesus, we&#039;ve come a long way, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell you what &#8212; the internet&#8217;s sure brought golden showers out of Germany and right into the mainstream these days. I understand even the Catholic <a href="http://www.familylife.com.au/">Family Life</a> movement gives it the tacit nod, when enjoyed between monogamous husbands and wives in the act of procreation.</p>
<p>Jesus, we&#8217;ve come a long way, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; So, did we attract more porn searches?</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/#comment-13656</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; So, did we attract more porn searches?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1714#comment-13656</guid>
		<description>[...] publishing a list of porn site search terms change the pattern of traffic to this website? Not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] publishing a list of porn site search terms change the pattern of traffic to this website? Not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/#comment-13480</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1714#comment-13480</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Julie:&lt;/strong&gt; Yes, I use the &lt;a href=&quot;http://akismet.com&quot;&gt;Akismet&lt;/a&gt; comment-spam filter for WordPress, and it&#039;s blocked more than 30,000 comments so far. I just &lt;em&gt;chose&lt;/em&gt; to look through the blocked comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Julie:</strong> Yes, I use the <a href="http://akismet.com">Akismet</a> comment-spam filter for WordPress, and it&#8217;s blocked more than 30,000 comments so far. I just <em>chose</em> to look through the blocked comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/#comment-13470</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1714#comment-13470</guid>
		<description>Wow -- that is quite a list!  My program that I use to blog (WordPress) has a spam filter that keeps that kind of junk out of my incoming comments -- it just deletes them.  Doesn&#039;t yours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8212; that is quite a list!  My program that I use to blog (WordPress) has a spam filter that keeps that kind of junk out of my incoming comments &#8212; it just deletes them.  Doesn&#8217;t yours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/#comment-13400</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1714#comment-13400</guid>
		<description>Gosh I&#039;m glad I didn&#039;t stay around to watch the comments on this one!

&lt;strong&gt;@Randy Brown:&lt;/strong&gt; I&#039;d have thought &quot;vector porn&quot; referred to pornographic images that were vector (outline) graphics, as opposed to photos. But I&#039;m guessing.

&lt;strong&gt;@Alex:&lt;/strong&gt; Yes, I will report back on the traffic this post attracts. Though &lt;strong&gt;@Stephen Stockwell&lt;/strong&gt;, the &lt;em&gt;computer&lt;/em&gt; does the collation of the data automatically. Me, the human, does the analysis.

&lt;strong&gt;@Vinae Bay:&lt;/strong&gt; The wonderful Internet transmits every kind of human communication -- including pornography. Pornography isn&#039;t sex education, of course, but both are a natural part of the human condition and I&#039;ll certainly continue writing about them.

I&#039;m not quite sure what angle you&#039;re coming from here but your last question is about how to automatically block porn without blocking &quot;the good stuff&quot;. short answer: you can&#039;t. The &quot;Net Nanny&quot; filters aren&#039;t foolproof -- I&#039;ve written previously why &lt;a href=&quot;http://stilgherrian.com/politics/internet_filters_waste_money/&quot;&gt;automated systems can never be fully effective&lt;/a&gt;, and some of the filters come the from Christian Right of American politics and also block any sites whose politics they don&#039;t agree with. They do drastically reduce the chances of accidentally stumbling across something you don&#039;t want, but they won&#039;t prevent your lads &lt;em&gt;deliberately&lt;/em&gt; looking for the dirty stuff. If you block it, they&#039;ll just find it elsewhere.

I suspect the only effective answer is a combination of education and supervision.

I feel uncomfortable saying much more because (1) I&#039;m not a parent and know bugger all about parenting, and (2) if you have a look though my writing, you&#039;ll find that &lt;a href=&quot;http://stilgherrian.com/tag/censorship/&quot;&gt;I&#039;m actually against censorship&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh I&#8217;m glad I didn&#8217;t stay around to watch the comments on this one!</p>
<p><strong>@Randy Brown:</strong> I&#8217;d have thought &#8220;vector porn&#8221; referred to pornographic images that were vector (outline) graphics, as opposed to photos. But I&#8217;m guessing.</p>
<p><strong>@Alex:</strong> Yes, I will report back on the traffic this post attracts. Though <strong>@Stephen Stockwell</strong>, the <em>computer</em> does the collation of the data automatically. Me, the human, does the analysis.</p>
<p><strong>@Vinae Bay:</strong> The wonderful Internet transmits every kind of human communication &#8212; including pornography. Pornography isn&#8217;t sex education, of course, but both are a natural part of the human condition and I&#8217;ll certainly continue writing about them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure what angle you&#8217;re coming from here but your last question is about how to automatically block porn without blocking &#8220;the good stuff&#8221;. short answer: you can&#8217;t. The &#8220;Net Nanny&#8221; filters aren&#8217;t foolproof &#8212; I&#8217;ve written previously why <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/internet_filters_waste_money/">automated systems can never be fully effective</a>, and some of the filters come the from Christian Right of American politics and also block any sites whose politics they don&#8217;t agree with. They do drastically reduce the chances of accidentally stumbling across something you don&#8217;t want, but they won&#8217;t prevent your lads <em>deliberately</em> looking for the dirty stuff. If you block it, they&#8217;ll just find it elsewhere.</p>
<p>I suspect the only effective answer is a combination of education and supervision.</p>
<p>I feel uncomfortable saying much more because (1) I&#8217;m not a parent and know bugger all about parenting, and (2) if you have a look though my writing, you&#8217;ll find that <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/tag/censorship/">I&#8217;m actually against censorship</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/#comment-13395</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1714#comment-13395</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@Vinae Bay:&lt;/b&gt; Please correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but are you trying to imply -- without actually spitting it out -- that Stilgherrian is being irresponsible and unhelpful to your child-raising efforts by running an article like this on his own website? I would have thought that if parents haven&#039;t taken the responsibility to start talking to their kids about sex by the time they&#039;re old enough to surf the internet, then they have only themselves to blame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@Vinae Bay:</b> Please correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but are you trying to imply &#8212; without actually spitting it out &#8212; that Stilgherrian is being irresponsible and unhelpful to your child-raising efforts by running an article like this on his own website? I would have thought that if parents haven&#8217;t taken the responsibility to start talking to their kids about sex by the time they&#8217;re old enough to surf the internet, then they have only themselves to blame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinae Bay</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/#comment-13390</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinae Bay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1714#comment-13390</guid>
		<description>I have young sons that surf the net.  With all the porn on the internet now, it&#039;s extremely hard to set the &#039;net nanny&#039; type tools so that they can search for what they need to find without coming up on something they don&#039;t need to be seeing, you know what I&#039;m saying?  It&#039;s a shame that something as educational and useful has turned into such a sex education tool also.  Tell me how to block them without blocking relevant sites, please!!!

Thank you,
Vinae</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have young sons that surf the net.  With all the porn on the internet now, it&#8217;s extremely hard to set the &#8216;net nanny&#8217; type tools so that they can search for what they need to find without coming up on something they don&#8217;t need to be seeing, you know what I&#8217;m saying?  It&#8217;s a shame that something as educational and useful has turned into such a sex education tool also.  Tell me how to block them without blocking relevant sites, please!!!</p>
<p>Thank you,<br />
Vinae</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Saxe</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/#comment-13386</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Saxe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1714#comment-13386</guid>
		<description>An amazing list that you got going on there, certainly is a list that makes one wonder all kinds of things, but I won&#039;t go into them here. Interesting subjects are to be here at your site, glad that I took the time to look around.
Respectfully,
Dr Saxe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An amazing list that you got going on there, certainly is a list that makes one wonder all kinds of things, but I won&#8217;t go into them here. Interesting subjects are to be here at your site, glad that I took the time to look around.<br />
Respectfully,<br />
Dr Saxe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/#comment-13367</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1714#comment-13367</guid>
		<description>Oh, he&#039;ll be collating that data as we speak, Alex.
You can bet on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, he&#8217;ll be collating that data as we speak, Alex.<br />
You can bet on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/#comment-13365</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 04:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1714#comment-13365</guid>
		<description>Promise me you&#039;ll do a follow up post with all the crazy Google searches you&#039;re going to have giving hits traffic to your blog in the next few weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Promise me you&#8217;ll do a follow up post with all the crazy Google searches you&#8217;re going to have giving hits traffic to your blog in the next few weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/#comment-13355</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1714#comment-13355</guid>
		<description>But I&#039;ll concede that &#039;innocent librarians &amp; unfit single nerds&#039; &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt; take that setup to a new, more realistic level. If not more raunchy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I&#8217;ll concede that &#8216;innocent librarians &amp; unfit single nerds&#8217; <i>does</i> take that setup to a new, more realistic level. If not more raunchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Brown</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/#comment-13354</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1714#comment-13354</guid>
		<description>WTF is &quot;Vector porn&quot; ?!  I guess i&#039;ll have to go do some &quot;research&quot; to  find out :-) ..   In the meantime i&#039;m trying to decide which is worse: asphyxia porn or &quot;rabitt porn&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF is &#8220;Vector porn&#8221; ?!  I guess i&#8217;ll have to go do some &#8220;research&#8221; to  find out <img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ..   In the meantime i&#8217;m trying to decide which is worse: asphyxia porn or &#8220;rabitt porn&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/#comment-13353</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1714#comment-13353</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@anon:&lt;/b&gt; I was going to include librarian porn but I thought it would probably fall into those more &#039;traditional&#039; fetishes that probably wouldn&#039;t raise an eyebrow. Like bosses &amp; secretaries, nurses/doctors &amp; patients, teachers &amp; schoolgirls. You get the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@anon:</b> I was going to include librarian porn but I thought it would probably fall into those more &#8216;traditional&#8217; fetishes that probably wouldn&#8217;t raise an eyebrow. Like bosses &amp; secretaries, nurses/doctors &amp; patients, teachers &amp; schoolgirls. You get the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
