<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sensis&#8217; legal bullying revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/marketing/sensis_legal_bullies_revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/marketing/sensis_legal_bullies_revisited/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 13:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zhasper</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/marketing/sensis_legal_bullies_revisited/#comment-10831</link>
		<dc:creator>Zhasper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 05:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/marketing/sensis_legal_bullies_revisited/#comment-10831</guid>
		<description>No, it's not the holy grail. Once a term becomes generic, you lose the ability to stop other people from using the term to apply to their products - "bandaid" now refers to any cheap, quick fix, buying "Kleenex" doesn't neccessarily mean that the Kleenex company made any money. Google went so far as to release a &lt;a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/10/do-you-google.html"&gt;blog post&lt;/a&gt; about this years ago...

Just google... I mean, just use Google to search for "genericide" to see some of the stories about companies who lost trademarks...

(obdisc: comments are my own, not my employer's, except for the blog post which is my employer's and not mine).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#8217;s not the holy grail. Once a term becomes generic, you lose the ability to stop other people from using the term to apply to their products - &#8220;bandaid&#8221; now refers to any cheap, quick fix, buying &#8220;Kleenex&#8221; doesn&#8217;t neccessarily mean that the Kleenex company made any money. Google went so far as to release a <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/10/do-you-google.html">blog post</a> about this years ago&#8230;</p>
<p>Just google&#8230; I mean, just use Google to search for &#8220;genericide&#8221; to see some of the stories about companies who lost trademarks&#8230;</p>
<p>(obdisc: comments are my own, not my employer&#8217;s, except for the blog post which is my employer&#8217;s and not mine).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zern</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/marketing/sensis_legal_bullies_revisited/#comment-10765</link>
		<dc:creator>Zern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/marketing/sensis_legal_bullies_revisited/#comment-10765</guid>
		<description>Hold on, did I read this right? 

Sensis wants to "prevent their trademark turning into a generic word"?

Isn't that the Holy Grail of marketing and positioning? To have your brand name turn into a generic word?

I present: Google, Hoover, Kleenex, Bandaid...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold on, did I read this right? </p>
<p>Sensis wants to &#8220;prevent their trademark turning into a generic word&#8221;?</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t that the Holy Grail of marketing and positioning? To have your brand name turn into a generic word?</p>
<p>I present: Google, Hoover, Kleenex, Bandaid&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
