<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anna Warwick: liar, or just unethical?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: palabreria</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/#comment-13600</link>
		<dc:creator>palabreria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1720#comment-13600</guid>
		<description>It's fairly clear who the audience is that News.com is aiming for here. A quick read of the comments pretty much sums up the level of readership. 

Most, in fact, all, of the readers who came to this blog foolishly believing they were going to get advice on managing their money have abandoned it in disgust leaving mostly a band of (undoubtedly butterfly loving) "chicks" who are impressed by Ms Warwick's name dropping and waffling on about how fabulous she and her friends are http://blogs.news.com.au/squanderlust/index.php/news/comments/when_i_grow_up_i_want_to_be/ and a few guys who want to impress her with their self-assessed financial know how. 

The thing is it obviously gets hits, regardless of the quality of the writing and the content; the last post has over 100 comments. What worried me more than this hard-hitting piece on the tragedy of losing a pair of designer sunnies were the entries where she failed to do enough research to even realise she was spruiking "wraps" a kind of real estate loan sharking http://blogs.news.com.au/squanderlust/index.php/news/comments/money_secrets_of_the_rich/ Not that News Limited felt any responsibility to remove the post or even distance themselves from her irresponsible comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s fairly clear who the audience is that News.com is aiming for here. A quick read of the comments pretty much sums up the level of readership. </p>
<p>Most, in fact, all, of the readers who came to this blog foolishly believing they were going to get advice on managing their money have abandoned it in disgust leaving mostly a band of (undoubtedly butterfly loving) &#8220;chicks&#8221; who are impressed by Ms Warwick&#8217;s name dropping and waffling on about how fabulous she and her friends are <a href="http://blogs.news.com.au/squanderlust/index.php/news/comments/when_i_grow_up_i_want_to_be/" >http://blogs.news.com.au/squanderlust/index.php/news/comments/when_i_grow_up_i_want_to_be/</a> and a few guys who want to impress her with their self-assessed financial know how. </p>
<p>The thing is it obviously gets hits, regardless of the quality of the writing and the content; the last post has over 100 comments. What worried me more than this hard-hitting piece on the tragedy of losing a pair of designer sunnies were the entries where she failed to do enough research to even realise she was spruiking &#8220;wraps&#8221; a kind of real estate loan sharking <a href="http://blogs.news.com.au/squanderlust/index.php/news/comments/money_secrets_of_the_rich/" >http://blogs.news.com.au/squanderlust/index.php/news/comments/money_secrets_of_the_rich/</a> Not that News Limited felt any responsibility to remove the post or even distance themselves from her irresponsible comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/#comment-13592</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1720#comment-13592</guid>
		<description>Wow! She's really intractably hostile! A Texan running a blog with her shotgun pointed at anyone who dares to contribute. "No one's as smart as me, fuck the rest o'yuz."

What was that about not conforming to male ideals, again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! She&#8217;s really intractably hostile! A Texan running a blog with her shotgun pointed at anyone who dares to contribute. &#8220;No one&#8217;s as smart as me, fuck the rest o&#8217;yuz.&#8221;</p>
<p>What was that about not conforming to male ideals, again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anastasia</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/#comment-13590</link>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1720#comment-13590</guid>
		<description>"I hate the patriarchy" is one blog: http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I hate the patriarchy&#8221; is one blog: <a href="http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com" >http://blog.iblamethepatriarchy.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/#comment-13588</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1720#comment-13588</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@Anastasia:&lt;/b&gt; Just out of interest, could you please put me onto a few of these radical feminist blogs you speak of?

Many thanks,
Stephen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@Anastasia:</b> Just out of interest, could you please put me onto a few of these radical feminist blogs you speak of?</p>
<p>Many thanks,<br />
Stephen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anastasia</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/#comment-13587</link>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1720#comment-13587</guid>
		<description>Maybe it's just me but 'published author and seasoned performer' don't blend well. What does she perform? But the 'perform' is an apt word in relation to the bar swindle. She satisfies my creepy list: butterflies. There's something weird about being a female adult and covering a site with butterflies, but that's second on my list. The creepiest thing: adult women with boudoirs filled with cutesy stuffed animals on their beds. 

Journalists (for mass media) can't really break free and become bloggers (in the sense of being at liberty to express how they feel about a subject) due to the editorial control in the newspapers. I remember when the Tom Cruise/YouTube video came out and one Sydney journalist couldn't write about it in his newspaper blog because it was deemed too controversial, so he did the next best thing, sent it out via email. Then again, like newspapers, blogs can be biased, and bloggers can censor others' comments. It happens. My pet hate on the web at this moment is radical feminist blogging, where any view contrary to theirs isn't published. It's ironic: feminists censoring other women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just me but &#8216;published author and seasoned performer&#8217; don&#8217;t blend well. What does she perform? But the &#8216;perform&#8217; is an apt word in relation to the bar swindle. She satisfies my creepy list: butterflies. There&#8217;s something weird about being a female adult and covering a site with butterflies, but that&#8217;s second on my list. The creepiest thing: adult women with boudoirs filled with cutesy stuffed animals on their beds. </p>
<p>Journalists (for mass media) can&#8217;t really break free and become bloggers (in the sense of being at liberty to express how they feel about a subject) due to the editorial control in the newspapers. I remember when the Tom Cruise/YouTube video came out and one Sydney journalist couldn&#8217;t write about it in his newspaper blog because it was deemed too controversial, so he did the next best thing, sent it out via email. Then again, like newspapers, blogs can be biased, and bloggers can censor others&#8217; comments. It happens. My pet hate on the web at this moment is radical feminist blogging, where any view contrary to theirs isn&#8217;t published. It&#8217;s ironic: feminists censoring other women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snarky Platypus</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/#comment-13504</link>
		<dc:creator>Snarky Platypus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1720#comment-13504</guid>
		<description>Anna Warwick, two words:

Boxed wine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anna Warwick, two words:</p>
<p>Boxed wine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/#comment-13495</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 05:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1720#comment-13495</guid>
		<description>'real journalists' are much more subtle: wallet open on the table, oops is that my press card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;real journalists&#8217; are much more subtle: wallet open on the table, oops is that my press card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; Which are the best Australian political blogs?</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/#comment-13481</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; Which are the best Australian political blogs?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1720#comment-13481</guid>
		<description>[...] skeptical asked in the comments, where are the good Australian political [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] skeptical asked in the comments, where are the good Australian political [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/#comment-13479</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1720#comment-13479</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@skeptical:&lt;/strong&gt; I think you're confusing the general with the specific. My gripe with some (many?) traditionalists is that they &lt;em&gt;assume&lt;/em&gt; anything done by anyone who wasn't trained their way is &lt;em&gt;automatically&lt;/em&gt; wrong, and they assert that journalism is &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; fact-checked etc. All I'm saying is that both journalistic and non-journalistic writing about current events covers the spectrum from very good to very bad. And that the continuation of these stereotyped debates is tedious.

I'm not a big fan of hypocrisy, although like all humans I'm occasionally guilty of it. If that put me on a high horse, so be it.

What stories have I broken? Lately? Nil. That's not my job. However when I worked with ABC Radio I did occasionally break stories -- though not many, because at the ABC that's the newsroom's job, not the program producers', and the demarcation was made quite clear. That, perhaps, is part  the problem: some journalists seem to think that only they have the right to break stories.

Where are the bloggers on the front line in Iraq? They're called "soldiers" and Red Crescent workers, and have been writing interesting stuff. And there's plenty of good Australian political writing in blogs -- I'll do a list some time. It's written in the &lt;em&gt;style&lt;/em&gt; of news writing -- but that's the point. We're talking about new forms here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@skeptical:</strong> I think you&#8217;re confusing the general with the specific. My gripe with some (many?) traditionalists is that they <em>assume</em> anything done by anyone who wasn&#8217;t trained their way is <em>automatically</em> wrong, and they assert that journalism is <em>all</em> fact-checked etc. All I&#8217;m saying is that both journalistic and non-journalistic writing about current events covers the spectrum from very good to very bad. And that the continuation of these stereotyped debates is tedious.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of hypocrisy, although like all humans I&#8217;m occasionally guilty of it. If that put me on a high horse, so be it.</p>
<p>What stories have I broken? Lately? Nil. That&#8217;s not my job. However when I worked with ABC Radio I did occasionally break stories &#8212; though not many, because at the ABC that&#8217;s the newsroom&#8217;s job, not the program producers&#8217;, and the demarcation was made quite clear. That, perhaps, is part  the problem: some journalists seem to think that only they have the right to break stories.</p>
<p>Where are the bloggers on the front line in Iraq? They&#8217;re called &#8220;soldiers&#8221; and Red Crescent workers, and have been writing interesting stuff. And there&#8217;s plenty of good Australian political writing in blogs &#8212; I&#8217;ll do a list some time. It&#8217;s written in the <em>style</em> of news writing &#8212; but that&#8217;s the point. We&#8217;re talking about new forms here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl Beckham</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/#comment-13468</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl Beckham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1720#comment-13468</guid>
		<description>As someone who has worked at a Kiosk at the local mall selling designer sunglasses, if a person can afford $100 - $400 for a pair of designer sunglasses, then they should not be complaining about a $14 glass of wine. Just my thoughts on the matter!
Sincerely,
Cheryl Beckham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who has worked at a Kiosk at the local mall selling designer sunglasses, if a person can afford $100 - $400 for a pair of designer sunglasses, then they should not be complaining about a $14 glass of wine. Just my thoughts on the matter!<br />
Sincerely,<br />
Cheryl Beckham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Papa Latty</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/#comment-13463</link>
		<dc:creator>Papa Latty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1720#comment-13463</guid>
		<description>I am going to have to go with Liar!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to have to go with Liar!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeptical</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/#comment-13459</link>
		<dc:creator>skeptical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 09:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1720#comment-13459</guid>
		<description>i'm talking to our host blogger, alright. Not you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m talking to our host blogger, alright. Not you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/#comment-13458</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1720#comment-13458</guid>
		<description>*Clarification:

&lt;i&gt;Trying&lt;/i&gt; to scab drinks.
Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Clarification:</p>
<p><i>Trying</i> to scab drinks.<br />
Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/#comment-13457</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1720#comment-13457</guid>
		<description>Never mind. You don't make much sense.

Just for starters: How is Ms Warwick a "poor woman", when she acts offended at being called for scabbing drinks at some top-end bar, and bullshitting about her job? Give a girl a break, &lt;i&gt;per-LEASE!&lt;/i&gt;

I won't bother with the rest.
I don't have time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind. You don&#8217;t make much sense.</p>
<p>Just for starters: How is Ms Warwick a &#8220;poor woman&#8221;, when she acts offended at being called for scabbing drinks at some top-end bar, and bullshitting about her job? Give a girl a break, <i>per-LEASE!</i></p>
<p>I won&#8217;t bother with the rest.<br />
I don&#8217;t have time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/anna-warwick-liar-or-just-unethical/#comment-13456</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1720#comment-13456</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@skeptical:&lt;/b&gt; Um...who are you talking to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@skeptical:</b> Um&#8230;who are you talking to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
