<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Australia bans another video game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/media/aust_bans_another_video_game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/aust_bans_another_video_game/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 21:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/aust_bans_another_video_game/#comment-16215</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/media/aust_bans_another_video_game/#comment-16215</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Yeebok Shu&#039;in:&lt;/strong&gt; This is also precisely why the proponents of pervasive Internet censorship... sorry, &quot;filtering&quot; like the Australian Christian Lobby&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://newmatilda.com/2009/02/02/christian-lobby-are-new-lions-clean-feed&quot;&gt;Jim Wallace&lt;/a&gt; are misleading people when they talk about refused Classification (RC) material being about child pornography. A video game which in other countries would be rated R18+ also falls into that category because we don&#039;t have that category here in Australia.

As for the &quot;Why?&quot;, in most cases it&#039;s probably like the current one: a political trade-off for Senate votes from the extreme-right Christians by people who value short-term political gain over long-term thinking and human rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Yeebok Shu&#8217;in:</strong> This is also precisely why the proponents of pervasive Internet censorship&#8230; sorry, &#8220;filtering&#8221; like the Australian Christian Lobby&#8217;s <a href="http://newmatilda.com/2009/02/02/christian-lobby-are-new-lions-clean-feed">Jim Wallace</a> are misleading people when they talk about refused Classification (RC) material being about child pornography. A video game which in other countries would be rated R18+ also falls into that category because we don&#8217;t have that category here in Australia.</p>
<p>As for the &#8220;Why?&#8221;, in most cases it&#8217;s probably like the current one: a political trade-off for Senate votes from the extreme-right Christians by people who value short-term political gain over long-term thinking and human rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yeebok Shu'in</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/aust_bans_another_video_game/#comment-16212</link>
		<dc:creator>Yeebok Shu'in</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 20:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/media/aust_bans_another_video_game/#comment-16212</guid>
		<description>Yes, this one&#039;s quite an issue, especially when you consider the &#039;average&#039; gamer is apparently male and 35-40. That &#039;we&#039; (collective, not royal we) can only play games that are suitable for 15 year olds or younger IS a worry. It means bad things for the economy also, as people are forced to get the games they want &quot;illegally&quot; (eg buy it overseas or torrent it). In a few ways this is quite a large issue, particularly in terms of consistency : You can buy R/X rated magazines, books, movies, etc, but not games. Why ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this one&#8217;s quite an issue, especially when you consider the &#8216;average&#8217; gamer is apparently male and 35-40. That &#8216;we&#8217; (collective, not royal we) can only play games that are suitable for 15 year olds or younger IS a worry. It means bad things for the economy also, as people are forced to get the games they want &#8220;illegally&#8221; (eg buy it overseas or torrent it). In a few ways this is quite a large issue, particularly in terms of consistency : You can buy R/X rated magazines, books, movies, etc, but not games. Why ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

