“Essential”? It’s all a matter of perspective…

“Essential”, says the Macquarie Dictionary (Fourth Edition), means “absolutely necessary; indispensable: discipline is essential in an army“. But the new Thursday supplement in the Sydney Morning Herald, entitled essential: Style + Home + Health (not online), must work to a different definition.

Here’s what I thought might have been “essential”: oxygen; clean drinking water; food; shelter from the elements; basic medical care. Perhaps in our urbanised society I should add: cash; photo ID; a bank account; literacy and numeracy skills; a home address; access to a telephone.

Here’s what essential thinks is essential: Tiffany jewelry designed by architect Frank Gehry; chocolate pudding moulds shaped like the Buddha (yes, really); for her, a yellow silk blouse that costs $399; for him, a Ralph Lauren jacket that costs $1895; a male nanny.

That’s editorial, not advertising. This is what the “journalists” think is “essential”. Look at the ads and it gets worse.

Now I have none of this things which essential says are essential. Will I now wither and die? I am afraid…

Possibly related posts

No related posts.

Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Rss Feed Tweeter button Technorati button Reddit button Myspace button Linkedin button Webonews button Delicious button Digg button Stumbleupon button Newsvine button