<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally, something positive about journalism and Twitter!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/media/finally-something-positive-about-journalism-and-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/finally-something-positive-about-journalism-and-twitter/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 21:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/finally-something-positive-about-journalism-and-twitter/#comment-15877</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=3380#comment-15877</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Cassie ST:&lt;/strong&gt; THere is a perception (possibly wrong) that Twitter has an older demographic, whereas SMS usage is much higher amongst the young. Is the lack of SMS-like abbreviations just a reflection of an older, linguistically more conservative user base? Or a reflection of the high level of &quot;professional communicators&quot; like journalists and marketing/PR people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Cassie ST:</strong> THere is a perception (possibly wrong) that Twitter has an older demographic, whereas SMS usage is much higher amongst the young. Is the lack of SMS-like abbreviations just a reflection of an older, linguistically more conservative user base? Or a reflection of the high level of &#8220;professional communicators&#8221; like journalists and marketing/PR people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassie ST</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/media/finally-something-positive-about-journalism-and-twitter/#comment-15853</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassie ST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=3380#comment-15853</guid>
		<description>Exactly Stil (and David Schlesinger).  Twitter is a tool.  Sometimes it&#039;s a tool that can break/create news, but mostly it&#039;s part of the process, which adds value overall.

Oh, and an obeservation.  Maybe it&#039;s just the circles I follow, but given the brevity (discipline) a &quot;tweet&quot; requires, I have yet to see any seepage of (incomprehensible) SMS shorthand into the twitter stream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly Stil (and David Schlesinger).  Twitter is a tool.  Sometimes it&#8217;s a tool that can break/create news, but mostly it&#8217;s part of the process, which adds value overall.</p>
<p>Oh, and an obeservation.  Maybe it&#8217;s just the circles I follow, but given the brevity (discipline) a &#8220;tweet&#8221; requires, I have yet to see any seepage of (incomprehensible) SMS shorthand into the twitter stream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

