<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prussia.Net versus Skank Media: my new business structure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/personal/prussia_net_vs_skank_media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/personal/prussia_net_vs_skank_media/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; The problem with changing what you do&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/personal/prussia_net_vs_skank_media/#comment-12260</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; The problem with changing what you do&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/personal/prussia_net_vs_skank_media/#comment-12260</guid>
		<description>[...] written before how I&#8217;m starting a business called Skank Media, and the new Topic 9 website is the first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written before how I&#8217;m starting a business called Skank Media, and the new Topic 9 website is the first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/personal/prussia_net_vs_skank_media/#comment-11070</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/personal/prussia_net_vs_skank_media/#comment-11070</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Levuka:&lt;/strong&gt; Interesting comment -- because "making widgets" is precisely what I &lt;em&gt;won't&lt;/em&gt; be doing. I think it's the wrong approach to using social media, and it's not what I want to be doing personally.

As I've &lt;a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/social_media_about_people/"&gt;previously written&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;One of the biggest mistakes businesses make when thinking about social media is that it’s all about the tools -- that if only they choose the right software they’ll be a success. That’s about as sensible as thinking your retail business will be successful if only you buy the right bookkeeping software.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As that article concludes, you actually have to &lt;em&gt;think&lt;/em&gt; and work out what makes your business &lt;em&gt;different&lt;/em&gt; from its competitors -- not sprinkle the Magick Box of Social Media Dust on your website. All you'll end up with is another messy collection of bits and pieces that don't really work together well -- because there isn't an overall strategy, let alone a plan.

As for the personal angle, well, I'm simply not interested in being a widget-builder. There's plenty of programmers out there already flooding the world with cute gadgets. I'm simply not interested in being another tradesman.

Also, creating a shelf full of pre-designed and pre-costed widgets for people to choose from assumes you already know what people might want, and can invest the time and money to create these generic widgets, all before you've got a single customer. Given that I think it's the wrong approach anyway, this makes it doubly risky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Levuka:</strong> Interesting comment &#8212; because &#8220;making widgets&#8221; is precisely what I <em>won&#8217;t</em> be doing. I think it&#8217;s the wrong approach to using social media, and it&#8217;s not what I want to be doing personally.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/social_media_about_people/">previously written</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>One of the biggest mistakes businesses make when thinking about social media is that it’s all about the tools &#8212; that if only they choose the right software they’ll be a success. That’s about as sensible as thinking your retail business will be successful if only you buy the right bookkeeping software.</p></blockquote>
<p>As that article concludes, you actually have to <em>think</em> and work out what makes your business <em>different</em> from its competitors &#8212; not sprinkle the Magick Box of Social Media Dust on your website. All you&#8217;ll end up with is another messy collection of bits and pieces that don&#8217;t really work together well &#8212; because there isn&#8217;t an overall strategy, let alone a plan.</p>
<p>As for the personal angle, well, I&#8217;m simply not interested in being a widget-builder. There&#8217;s plenty of programmers out there already flooding the world with cute gadgets. I&#8217;m simply not interested in being another tradesman.</p>
<p>Also, creating a shelf full of pre-designed and pre-costed widgets for people to choose from assumes you already know what people might want, and can invest the time and money to create these generic widgets, all before you&#8217;ve got a single customer. Given that I think it&#8217;s the wrong approach anyway, this makes it doubly risky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levuka</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/personal/prussia_net_vs_skank_media/#comment-10967</link>
		<dc:creator>Levuka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/personal/prussia_net_vs_skank_media/#comment-10967</guid>
		<description>Feedback:  Small business needs to know the price, first.  So how about you offer fixed-price Skank-widget add-ons to client sites?  You list the widgets, a description, and the business ticks the box.   That would help us buy more from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feedback:  Small business needs to know the price, first.  So how about you offer fixed-price Skank-widget add-ons to client sites?  You list the widgets, a description, and the business ticks the box.   That would help us buy more from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prussia.Net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thoughts on Prussia.Net&#8217;s future</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/personal/prussia_net_vs_skank_media/#comment-9788</link>
		<dc:creator>Prussia.Net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Thoughts on Prussia.Net&#8217;s future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/personal/prussia_net_vs_skank_media/#comment-9788</guid>
		<description>[...] has been thinking about how Prussia.Net will evolve in 2008. An article on his personal website Prussia.Net versus Skank Media: my new business structure has the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been thinking about how Prussia.Net will evolve in 2008. An article on his personal website Prussia.Net versus Skank Media: my new business structure has the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/personal/prussia_net_vs_skank_media/#comment-9778</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/personal/prussia_net_vs_skank_media/#comment-9778</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Zern:&lt;/strong&gt; Thanks for the confirmation. I've run these thoughts past a couple of other people and they agree it makes sense. That's a separate question from whether it's A Good Idea, but at least my explanation works. Apart from the mixed metaphor of discussing things through an umbrella (!) I'm happy with that as a starting-point.

Skank Media's and its clients' goals might not be &lt;em&gt;business&lt;/em&gt; goals necessarily, they might be political or societal or whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Zern:</strong> Thanks for the confirmation. I&#8217;ve run these thoughts past a couple of other people and they agree it makes sense. That&#8217;s a separate question from whether it&#8217;s A Good Idea, but at least my explanation works. Apart from the mixed metaphor of discussing things through an umbrella (!) I&#8217;m happy with that as a starting-point.</p>
<p>Skank Media&#8217;s and its clients&#8217; goals might not be <em>business</em> goals necessarily, they might be political or societal or whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zern</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/personal/prussia_net_vs_skank_media/#comment-9761</link>
		<dc:creator>Zern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/personal/prussia_net_vs_skank_media/#comment-9761</guid>
		<description>Good clarity. Prussia.Net keeps the pipes and pumps running. Skank Media makes/thinks/talks about the stuff that goes down the pipes...

Skank Media could be very focused: doing ONLY social media. Every project must involve a social interaction channel/device/mechanism tied into business goals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good clarity. Prussia.Net keeps the pipes and pumps running. Skank Media makes/thinks/talks about the stuff that goes down the pipes&#8230;</p>
<p>Skank Media could be very focused: doing ONLY social media. Every project must involve a social interaction channel/device/mechanism tied into business goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
