<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Site Policies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/policies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10663</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10663</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Alex Willemyns:&lt;/strong&gt; Choosing &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; to think is always the easiest option, m'boy.

Mind you, there's a major point still missing from the Privacy Policy: all the "little brothers" of the corporate data mining world which are perhaps more disturbing than the potential "big brothers" of the global intelligence community.

The latter are generally filled with people who are indoctrinated with the ideals of Doing Good, and while there's the potential for extreme corruption there are also internal controls -- though whether they're sufficient or effective is another issue. The corporate data miners exist solely to make profit.

I'll write more about this very, very soon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Alex Willemyns:</strong> Choosing <em>not</em> to think is always the easiest option, m&#8217;boy.</p>
<p>Mind you, there&#8217;s a major point still missing from the Privacy Policy: all the &#8220;little brothers&#8221; of the corporate data mining world which are perhaps more disturbing than the potential &#8220;big brothers&#8221; of the global intelligence community.</p>
<p>The latter are generally filled with people who are indoctrinated with the ideals of Doing Good, and while there&#8217;s the potential for extreme corruption there are also internal controls &#8212; though whether they&#8217;re sufficient or effective is another issue. The corporate data miners exist solely to make profit.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll write more about this very, very soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Willemyns</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10650</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Willemyns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 11:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10650</guid>
		<description>Damn you, I hate thinking about the things you outlined under Privacy such as ECHELON. 

The stuff not even as hardcore as ECHELON is bad enough. Twenty to thirty years time is going to see so many politicians scrambling to cover their teenage MySpace tracks. 

Most likely, and this is totally unrelated to your Privacy Policy, it's going to lead to a whole bunch of new bland Howard/Rudd type politicians (the only people who used MySpace without leaving any dirty tracks behind -- it'll be sort of Darwinian).

You can probably lay claim to the most informative (and interesting) Privacy Policy on the net now too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn you, I hate thinking about the things you outlined under Privacy such as ECHELON. </p>
<p>The stuff not even as hardcore as ECHELON is bad enough. Twenty to thirty years time is going to see so many politicians scrambling to cover their teenage MySpace tracks. </p>
<p>Most likely, and this is totally unrelated to your Privacy Policy, it&#8217;s going to lead to a whole bunch of new bland Howard/Rudd type politicians (the only people who used MySpace without leaving any dirty tracks behind &#8212; it&#8217;ll be sort of Darwinian).</p>
<p>You can probably lay claim to the most informative (and interesting) Privacy Policy on the net now too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10580</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10580</guid>
		<description>There have been far too many fnord disturbing words this week. Something is about to go very strange indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been far too many fnord disturbing words this week. Something is about to go very strange indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweet Sister Morphine</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10555</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet Sister Morphine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10555</guid>
		<description>I... feel really paranoid and self-conscious now.  It's even fnord worse than when that chap at Australia Post told me that he could verify my identity with just my debit card number.

Interesting though.  I had not idea that websites collected &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; amount of detailed information.

Now if you'll excuse me, I've got to go construct a hat out of tinfoil,  build some kind of fortified bunker and start stockpiling food and ammunition...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8230; feel really paranoid and self-conscious now.  It&#8217;s even fnord worse than when that chap at Australia Post told me that he could verify my identity with just my debit card number.</p>
<p>Interesting though.  I had not idea that websites collected <i>that</i> amount of detailed information.</p>
<p>Now if you&#8217;ll excuse me, I&#8217;ve got to go construct a hat out of tinfoil,  build some kind of fortified bunker and start stockpiling food and ammunition&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10549</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10549</guid>
		<description>Thank you to everyone who enjoyed the Privacy Policy. I had fun writing it. Link away!

&lt;strong&gt;@Quatrefoil:&lt;/strong&gt; Good point about copyright. I shall amend the copyright notice soonishly to reflect that I only hold copyright in what &lt;em&gt;I&lt;/em&gt; write and photograph.

&lt;strong&gt;@Eric TF Bat:&lt;/strong&gt; Ah but I will allow your comment to pass because I only &lt;em&gt;may&lt;/em&gt; choose not to publish it. And your rant is worthwhile! "Mangle sputum glossop!" to you too!

Yeah the "Can I link" thing gets me. A link it like saying "There are these words or pictures on page 78 of a book." Statement of fact. Mind you, some companies try to assert that you have to link only to their home page. Such companies are... odd.

&lt;strong&gt;@Bernard:&lt;/strong&gt; Thank you. The words have been forming in my mind for ages. For some reason last night a wave of stress was lifted and the Muse struck. I've actually been up most of the night writing. More soon.

Maybe it's the eclipse...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you to everyone who enjoyed the Privacy Policy. I had fun writing it. Link away!</p>
<p><strong>@Quatrefoil:</strong> Good point about copyright. I shall amend the copyright notice soonishly to reflect that I only hold copyright in what <em>I</em> write and photograph.</p>
<p><strong>@Eric TF Bat:</strong> Ah but I will allow your comment to pass because I only <em>may</em> choose not to publish it. And your rant is worthwhile! &#8220;Mangle sputum glossop!&#8221; to you too!</p>
<p>Yeah the &#8220;Can I link&#8221; thing gets me. A link it like saying &#8220;There are these words or pictures on page 78 of a book.&#8221; Statement of fact. Mind you, some companies try to assert that you have to link only to their home page. Such companies are&#8230; odd.</p>
<p><strong>@Bernard:</strong> Thank you. The words have been forming in my mind for ages. For some reason last night a wave of stress was lifted and the Muse struck. I&#8217;ve actually been up most of the night writing. More soon.</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s the eclipse&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10548</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10548</guid>
		<description>ETFB - "is like asking the security guard at the Louvre for permission to look at the pictures on the wall". Almost akin to asking them in English... funny blank stares and / or gallic shrugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ETFB - &#8220;is like asking the security guard at the Louvre for permission to look at the pictures on the wall&#8221;. Almost akin to asking them in English&#8230; funny blank stares and / or gallic shrugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10546</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10546</guid>
		<description>Ok, you're not my mother but can u please put a spook-link onto your site so that we consumers of Stilgherrian Goodness (TM) can self select 
a. Serious Threat to Global Security
b. Total Fuckwit
c. Move on Max - MostlyHarmless

Our spook levies at work in a more productive manner.

The UK's privacy laws - or should i say "privacy (removal) laws" are abominable, however the UK always has been pretty heavy handed in such regards. Admittedly it was easier in the old days when the Chaps network controlled things quite nicely.

I tend to disagree with your opening gambit "In Cyberspace anyone can see your undies". It is only that way because "we" have let "them" "do this" to "us". Will expand on that later. For now - I have a meeting to lob some logic grenades into.

btw - damn good explo of things. Specially for 2am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, you&#8217;re not my mother but can u please put a spook-link onto your site so that we consumers of Stilgherrian Goodness (TM) can self select<br />
a. Serious Threat to Global Security<br />
b. Total Fuckwit<br />
c. Move on Max - MostlyHarmless</p>
<p>Our spook levies at work in a more productive manner.</p>
<p>The UK&#8217;s privacy laws - or should i say &#8220;privacy (removal) laws&#8221; are abominable, however the UK always has been pretty heavy handed in such regards. Admittedly it was easier in the old days when the Chaps network controlled things quite nicely.</p>
<p>I tend to disagree with your opening gambit &#8220;In Cyberspace anyone can see your undies&#8221;. It is only that way because &#8220;we&#8221; have let &#8220;them&#8221; &#8220;do this&#8221; to &#8220;us&#8221;. Will expand on that later. For now - I have a meeting to lob some logic grenades into.</p>
<p>btw - damn good explo of things. Specially for 2am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric TF Bat</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10545</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric TF Bat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10545</guid>
		<description>(Hmmmph... your JavaScript preview let through the &#60;UL&#62; and &#60;LI&#62; tags but the final comment handler stripped them out.  Poot.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Hmmmph&#8230; your JavaScript preview let through the &lt;UL&gt; and &lt;LI&gt; tags but the final comment handler stripped them out.  Poot.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric TF Bat</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10544</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric TF Bat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10544</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;I may choose not to publish your comment:

If you’re making personal attacks.If you’re way off the topic of the discussion.If you seem incapable of assembling a coherent sentence.If you don’t say much beyond “That’s nice,” or “Yeah I agree,” or “That’s crap.” By all means tell me what you think, but explain yourself.If I’m in a bad mood.For any goddam reason I like.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Aha!  A challenge!

Stilgherrian, you ugly bastard! (#1) Dame Edna is a legend! (#2)  Mangle sputum glossop! (#3)  You're completely right! (#4)  Laurel Papworth has better tits than you! (#5, surely!)

But how to trigger #6?  Nope, I'm stumped.

Incidentally: I love your privacy policy.  I'm going to link to it from my site, &lt;i&gt;and there's nothing you can do to stop me!  Bwahahahahahahaha!!!&lt;/i&gt;[1]

[1] I hate the ignorant futtocks who ask "can I link to that from my Geocites/Facebook/AOL page?"  Of course you can link to it, you steaming great git!  What do you think the internet is for?  Asking for permission to link to someone's web page is like asking the security guard at the Louvre for permission to look at the pictures on the wall.  Stupid!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>I may choose not to publish your comment:</p>
<p>If you’re making personal attacks.If you’re way off the topic of the discussion.If you seem incapable of assembling a coherent sentence.If you don’t say much beyond “That’s nice,” or “Yeah I agree,” or “That’s crap.” By all means tell me what you think, but explain yourself.If I’m in a bad mood.For any goddam reason I like.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Aha!  A challenge!</p>
<p>Stilgherrian, you ugly bastard! (#1) Dame Edna is a legend! (#2)  Mangle sputum glossop! (#3)  You&#8217;re completely right! (#4)  Laurel Papworth has better tits than you! (#5, surely!)</p>
<p>But how to trigger #6?  Nope, I&#8217;m stumped.</p>
<p>Incidentally: I love your privacy policy.  I&#8217;m going to link to it from my site, <i>and there&#8217;s nothing you can do to stop me!  Bwahahahahahahaha!!!</i>[1]</p>
<p>[1] I hate the ignorant futtocks who ask &#8220;can I link to that from my Geocites/Facebook/AOL page?&#8221;  Of course you can link to it, you steaming great git!  What do you think the internet is for?  Asking for permission to link to someone&#8217;s web page is like asking the security guard at the Louvre for permission to look at the pictures on the wall.  Stupid!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quatrefoil</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10540</link>
		<dc:creator>Quatrefoil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10540</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure you're right -- you may in fact be God.  That privacy policy is brilliant, and explained a number of things that I didn't know, although I have always worked on the theory that there is no such thing as privacy.  I do, however, look for a statement that site owners won't be passing my email address on, and a statement that I retain copyright to my own writing if it's a site I write meaningful things on as opposed to comments (although that's inherent in Australian law).  I am, however, slightly chagrined that you know how often I get bored and check the blogs I read during the day...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure you&#8217;re right &#8212; you may in fact be God.  That privacy policy is brilliant, and explained a number of things that I didn&#8217;t know, although I have always worked on the theory that there is no such thing as privacy.  I do, however, look for a statement that site owners won&#8217;t be passing my email address on, and a statement that I retain copyright to my own writing if it&#8217;s a site I write meaningful things on as opposed to comments (although that&#8217;s inherent in Australian law).  I am, however, slightly chagrined that you know how often I get bored and check the blogs I read during the day&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; Website policies</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10534</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; Website policies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/policies/#comment-10534</guid>
		<description>[...] decided to write a Comments Policy, Privacy Policy and Legal Disclaimer for this website. I think you&#8217;ll find the lengthy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decided to write a Comments Policy, Privacy Policy and Legal Disclaimer for this website. I think you&#8217;ll find the lengthy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
