Comments on: A Surfeit of Stilgherrian http://stilgherrian.com/politics/a-surfeit-of-stilgherrian/ All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages! Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:24:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Stilgherrian http://stilgherrian.com/politics/a-surfeit-of-stilgherrian/#comment-16638 Stilgherrian Sun, 22 Mar 2009 05:34:24 +0000 http://stilgherrian.com/?p=3702#comment-16638 <strong>@Brillat:</strong> It's difficult for people working in law enforcement to comment on political issues. It's usually done through their staff associations. But it's a damn good avenue to explore. And I shall. @Brillat: It’s difficult for people working in law enforcement to comment on political issues. It’s usually done through their staff associations. But it’s a damn good avenue to explore. And I shall.

]]> By: Brillat http://stilgherrian.com/politics/a-surfeit-of-stilgherrian/#comment-16619 Brillat Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:35:06 +0000 http://stilgherrian.com/?p=3702#comment-16619 Not really germane to this entry in particular, but it would be really nice to see someone from law enforcement involved in actually catching child pornographers make a strong public statement to the effect that "The money proposed to be used on the Internet Filter will do nothing to reduce the production or consumption of child pornography, and if that money were given to anti-CP law enforcement instead, we could make a real difference." We know it's true. They know it's true. If they stated it loudly and publicly, the broader public might actually start to wonder why the politicians are pushing for a measure that the actual police involved in actually stopping child pornography think is stupid. Not really germane to this entry in particular, but it would be really nice to see someone from law enforcement involved in actually catching child pornographers make a strong public statement to the effect that “The money proposed to be used on the Internet Filter will do nothing to reduce the production or consumption of child pornography, and if that money were given to anti-CP law enforcement instead, we could make a real difference.”

We know it’s true. They know it’s true. If they stated it loudly and publicly, the broader public might actually start to wonder why the politicians are pushing for a measure that the actual police involved in actually stopping child pornography think is stupid.

]]> By: Stilgherrian http://stilgherrian.com/politics/a-surfeit-of-stilgherrian/#comment-16616 Stilgherrian Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:43:11 +0000 http://stilgherrian.com/?p=3702#comment-16616 <strong>@Neerav:</strong> Thanks for the quote and link! If I get time to expand on that, I will -- though I think my original statement is fairly clear, eh? @Neerav: Thanks for the quote and link! If I get time to expand on that, I will — though I think my original statement is fairly clear, eh?

]]> By: Neerav http://stilgherrian.com/politics/a-surfeit-of-stilgherrian/#comment-16595 Neerav Thu, 19 Mar 2009 04:21:36 +0000 http://stilgherrian.com/?p=3702#comment-16595 In case you missed it you were also quoted at <a href="http://www.bhatt.id.au/blog/intrusive-internet-video-ads-lose-friends-and-annoy-people/ this morning">Intrusive Internet Video Ads: Lose Friends and Annoy People</a> this morning. Fairfax person in their ad sales division has already contacted me to ask for further feedback re: the video ads -- if you email me any extra comments you have glad to forward onto them. In case you missed it you were also quoted at Intrusive Internet Video Ads: Lose Friends and Annoy People this morning.

Fairfax person in their ad sales division has already contacted me to ask for further feedback re: the video ads — if you email me any extra comments you have glad to forward onto them.

]]>