<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conroy thoroughly tangled in his own Rabbit-Proof Firewall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:24:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conroy’s filter hits online business &#124; Netregistry</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/#comment-37931</link>
		<dc:creator>Conroy’s filter hits online business &#124; Netregistry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2476#comment-37931</guid>
		<description>[...] content. Industry critics – such as the ‘No Clean Feed‘ action group – are arguing against deficiencies in the implementation of the filters and the potential damage to the Australian internet. This is why both sides seem to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] content. Industry critics – such as the ‘No Clean Feed‘ action group – are arguing against deficiencies in the implementation of the filters and the potential damage to the Australian internet. This is why both sides seem to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; Jim Wallace&#8217;s pro-censorship lies and distortions</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/#comment-15434</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; Jim Wallace&#8217;s pro-censorship lies and distortions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2476#comment-15434</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote in November: [We can] read for ourselves, on page 2, that the tests covered “technology to filter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote in November: [We can] read for ourselves, on page 2, that the tests covered “technology to filter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; His Benevolence Stilgherrian&#8217;s Christmas Message</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/#comment-15079</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; His Benevolence Stilgherrian&#8217;s Christmas Message</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 22:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2476#comment-15079</guid>
		<description>[...] and his Minister for Being a Complete Prick, Stephen Conroy, is trying to implement the most comprehensive censorship of the Internet of any Western [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and his Minister for Being a Complete Prick, Stephen Conroy, is trying to implement the most comprehensive censorship of the Internet of any Western [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; Lame parrots try to defend Internet censorship</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/#comment-14988</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; Lame parrots try to defend Internet censorship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2476#comment-14988</guid>
		<description>[...] to feed &#8249; Conroy thoroughly tangled in his own Rabbit-Proof Firewall &#160;&#8226;&#160; No Stilgherrian Live, but some live blogs today [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to feed &lsaquo; Conroy thoroughly tangled in his own Rabbit-Proof Firewall &nbsp;&bull;&nbsp; No Stilgherrian Live, but some live blogs today [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agmates Rural News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Agmates Quick Links Saturday 29th November 2008</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/#comment-14748</link>
		<dc:creator>Agmates Rural News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Agmates Quick Links Saturday 29th November 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2476#comment-14748</guid>
		<description>[...] Conroy Throughly Entangled In His Own Rabbit-Proof Firewall &#124; Stilgherrin. As any farmer can tell you, fencing is bloody dangerous. The stretch-wire-between-posts thing, I mean, not the pointy-steel-pokey thing. One mistake and it&#8217;s THWACKKKK! Ten metres of barbed wire whipping into your face. Senator Stephen Conroy is discovering the hard way that trying to build a Rabbit-Proof Firewall around the Internet is just as dangerous. As Bernard Keane points out in Crikey [Thursday], the standard politicians&#8217; tactic - lying - doesn&#8217;t cut it in today&#8217;s hyperconnected world. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Conroy Throughly Entangled In His Own Rabbit-Proof Firewall | Stilgherrin. As any farmer can tell you, fencing is bloody dangerous. The stretch-wire-between-posts thing, I mean, not the pointy-steel-pokey thing. One mistake and it&#8217;s THWACKKKK! Ten metres of barbed wire whipping into your face. Senator Stephen Conroy is discovering the hard way that trying to build a Rabbit-Proof Firewall around the Internet is just as dangerous. As Bernard Keane points out in Crikey [Thursday], the standard politicians&#8217; tactic &#8211; lying &#8211; doesn&#8217;t cut it in today&#8217;s hyperconnected world. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebSecure Blog &#187; Conroy’s Filter Hits Online Business</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/#comment-14703</link>
		<dc:creator>WebSecure Blog &#187; Conroy’s Filter Hits Online Business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2476#comment-14703</guid>
		<description>[...] over content. Industry critics - such as the ‘No Clean Feed‘ action group - are arguing against deficiencies in the implementation of the filters and the potential damage to the Australian internet. This is why both sides seem to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over content. Industry critics &#8211; such as the ‘No Clean Feed‘ action group &#8211; are arguing against deficiencies in the implementation of the filters and the potential damage to the Australian internet. This is why both sides seem to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/#comment-14517</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2476#comment-14517</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@Stilgherrian &amp; posty:&lt;/b&gt; Some very fair points there, gentlemen. There&#039;s a lot going on in my world over the next couple of months, so I&#039;ll have to see how I go at putting something together. But until such time as I meet that challenge, I shall return to my seat.

No one likes a whinger.
Including me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@Stilgherrian &amp; posty:</b> Some very fair points there, gentlemen. There&#8217;s a lot going on in my world over the next couple of months, so I&#8217;ll have to see how I go at putting something together. But until such time as I meet that challenge, I shall return to my seat.</p>
<p>No one likes a whinger.<br />
Including me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/#comment-14510</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2476#comment-14510</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Stephen Stockwell:&lt;/strong&gt; I think &lt;strong&gt;posty&lt;/strong&gt; has you there, Sir! A challenge has been made!

One of the trickiest things about this debate is that the government has already framed it in terms of &quot;clean feeds&quot; and &quot;filtering&quot;. Filters remove bad things, as in &quot;filtered water&quot;. Every time you repeat &quot;clean feed&quot;, even to say you don&#039;t want one, you reinforce the government&#039;s meme that the Internet is dirty and needs cleaning.

I&#039;ve tried to use the word &quot;censorship&quot; rather than &quot;filtering&quot; at every opportunity for that reason. This is also who I went for the Rabbit-Proof Firewall, to evoke images of an old-fashion, ineffective barrier and to piggy-back on BigPond&#039;s &quot;keep the rabbits out&quot; meme.

We definitely need a new &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Framing_(social_sciences)&quot;&gt;frame&lt;/a&gt; for this, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Stephen Stockwell:</strong> I think <strong>posty</strong> has you there, Sir! A challenge has been made!</p>
<p>One of the trickiest things about this debate is that the government has already framed it in terms of &#8220;clean feeds&#8221; and &#8220;filtering&#8221;. Filters remove bad things, as in &#8220;filtered water&#8221;. Every time you repeat &#8220;clean feed&#8221;, even to say you don&#8217;t want one, you reinforce the government&#8217;s meme that the Internet is dirty and needs cleaning.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried to use the word &#8220;censorship&#8221; rather than &#8220;filtering&#8221; at every opportunity for that reason. This is also who I went for the Rabbit-Proof Firewall, to evoke images of an old-fashion, ineffective barrier and to piggy-back on BigPond&#8217;s &#8220;keep the rabbits out&#8221; meme.</p>
<p>We definitely need a new <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Framing_(social_sciences)">frame</a> for this, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: posty</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/#comment-14508</link>
		<dc:creator>posty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 09:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2476#comment-14508</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@Stephen Stockwell&lt;/b&gt; I could have cut it differently, leaving the &#039;bohemian&#039; types out, but it wouldn&#039;t be representative of the people that were there. I thought of doing exactly that, but I didn&#039;t want to spin the shit out of it.

Maybe I should have done exactly that.

I&#039;m not a marketing whiz, the concept was put together in a manner of seconds. I didn&#039;t want these peoples enthusiasm for a good cause going to nothing. Sure, It was a &#039;small time lunch rally&#039;, but people aren&#039;t going to be out for blood in the streets over these types of things.

most people don&#039;t appear to care a tinkers cuss about freedom of speech and censorship until it directly effects them and they see it happening.

My intended message was that ALL SORTS of people, be it perceived &#039;normal&#039; people, the weird looking people, everyone is against this thing; not just a typical &#039;campaign&#039; like ad with just bright-eyed and bushy tailed youth with no logos and nobody looking vaguely different.

That these different people are against the &#039;clean feed&#039; and not &#039;pro child pornography&#039; which conroy has spouted at near every turn whenever criticised.

If I get people saying &quot;what the fuck is a clean feed?&quot; and the impression that some people are going &quot;clean feed = bad thing&quot; that&#039;s good enough for me. I&#039;ve shown it to people whom I expected not knowing anything about it and that&#039;s the exact response that I&#039;ve gotten. I&#039;ve learn&#039;t some valuable lessons with this video too.

but, Who the hell watches youtube over dinner? I didn&#039;t expect this to be picked up by mass-media. I expected this to be handed around &#039;viral&#039; style. and from the statistics, it appears I have achieved this goal.

Thanks for the criticism and I think you&#039;re mostly right - but I&#039;m doing something. you&#039;re whinging on a blog. :D

I invite you to one-up me sir. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@Stephen Stockwell</b> I could have cut it differently, leaving the &#8216;bohemian&#8217; types out, but it wouldn&#8217;t be representative of the people that were there. I thought of doing exactly that, but I didn&#8217;t want to spin the shit out of it.</p>
<p>Maybe I should have done exactly that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a marketing whiz, the concept was put together in a manner of seconds. I didn&#8217;t want these peoples enthusiasm for a good cause going to nothing. Sure, It was a &#8216;small time lunch rally&#8217;, but people aren&#8217;t going to be out for blood in the streets over these types of things.</p>
<p>most people don&#8217;t appear to care a tinkers cuss about freedom of speech and censorship until it directly effects them and they see it happening.</p>
<p>My intended message was that ALL SORTS of people, be it perceived &#8216;normal&#8217; people, the weird looking people, everyone is against this thing; not just a typical &#8216;campaign&#8217; like ad with just bright-eyed and bushy tailed youth with no logos and nobody looking vaguely different.</p>
<p>That these different people are against the &#8216;clean feed&#8217; and not &#8216;pro child pornography&#8217; which conroy has spouted at near every turn whenever criticised.</p>
<p>If I get people saying &#8220;what the fuck is a clean feed?&#8221; and the impression that some people are going &#8220;clean feed = bad thing&#8221; that&#8217;s good enough for me. I&#8217;ve shown it to people whom I expected not knowing anything about it and that&#8217;s the exact response that I&#8217;ve gotten. I&#8217;ve learn&#8217;t some valuable lessons with this video too.</p>
<p>but, Who the hell watches youtube over dinner? I didn&#8217;t expect this to be picked up by mass-media. I expected this to be handed around &#8216;viral&#8217; style. and from the statistics, it appears I have achieved this goal.</p>
<p>Thanks for the criticism and I think you&#8217;re mostly right &#8211; but I&#8217;m doing something. you&#8217;re whinging on a blog. <img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I invite you to one-up me sir. <img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/#comment-14477</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2476#comment-14477</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@posty:&lt;/b&gt; I wouldn&#039;t exactly call that clip a persuasive repudiation of the ISP Firewall. Who is the intended audience: The government? Internet users in general? I don&#039;t mean to be disrespectful, but it&#039;s far too easy for the government -- and a generally conservative electorate -- to dismiss a protest from what appears to be a group of students and the unemployed ... simply because they &lt;i&gt;look&lt;/i&gt; like students and the unemployed. Indeed, if a bunch of bohemian-looking types appear to the wider community to be holding the mantle of the case for no internet censorship, then their actions have the potential to diminish support from it&#039;s true magnitude as a popular internet-users movement. Perceptions like these &lt;i&gt;matter&lt;/i&gt; to government because they &lt;i&gt;matter&lt;/i&gt; to families watching the news over dinner. So if we really want to stop this thing, I think something with a little more gravitas, maturity and relevance than a small lunch-time rally on the steps of Parliament House (in Adelaide, if I&#039;m not mistaken) is what&#039;s required. It might not be fair, but that&#039;s the way the world works ... and how you get RESULTS.

Sorry about the whinge.
I&#039;ll shut up now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@posty:</b> I wouldn&#8217;t exactly call that clip a persuasive repudiation of the ISP Firewall. Who is the intended audience: The government? Internet users in general? I don&#8217;t mean to be disrespectful, but it&#8217;s far too easy for the government &#8212; and a generally conservative electorate &#8212; to dismiss a protest from what appears to be a group of students and the unemployed &#8230; simply because they <i>look</i> like students and the unemployed. Indeed, if a bunch of bohemian-looking types appear to the wider community to be holding the mantle of the case for no internet censorship, then their actions have the potential to diminish support from it&#8217;s true magnitude as a popular internet-users movement. Perceptions like these <i>matter</i> to government because they <i>matter</i> to families watching the news over dinner. So if we really want to stop this thing, I think something with a little more gravitas, maturity and relevance than a small lunch-time rally on the steps of Parliament House (in Adelaide, if I&#8217;m not mistaken) is what&#8217;s required. It might not be fair, but that&#8217;s the way the world works &#8230; and how you get RESULTS.</p>
<p>Sorry about the whinge.<br />
I&#8217;ll shut up now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainstorm &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Conroy’s Filter Hits Online Business</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/#comment-14475</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainstorm &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Conroy’s Filter Hits Online Business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2476#comment-14475</guid>
		<description>[...] Industry critics - such as the &#8216;No Clean Feed&#8216; action group - are arguing against deficiencies in the implementation of the filters and the potential damage to the Australian internet. This is why both sides seem to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Industry critics &#8211; such as the &#8216;No Clean Feed&#8216; action group &#8211; are arguing against deficiencies in the implementation of the filters and the potential damage to the Australian internet. This is why both sides seem to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: posty</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/#comment-14443</link>
		<dc:creator>posty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 01:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2476#comment-14443</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a 1 minute example of some of the backlash against Conroys &#039;Rabbit proof firewall&#039;.

One of the facebook protest events with a special message for Senator Conroy -

&lt;A HREF=&quot;http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=U6fLtpi5CkE&quot;&gt;Youtube - Message to Australian Politicians - NO CLEAN FEED&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a 1 minute example of some of the backlash against Conroys &#8216;Rabbit proof firewall&#8217;.</p>
<p>One of the facebook protest events with a special message for Senator Conroy -</p>
<p><a HREF="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=U6fLtpi5CkE">Youtube &#8211; Message to Australian Politicians &#8211; NO CLEAN FEED</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/#comment-14428</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2476#comment-14428</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Allison Reynolds:&lt;/strong&gt; Politicians have to cover such a huge range of different topics that they simply &lt;em&gt;have&lt;/em&gt; to rely on their advisors to, well, advise them.

I don&#039;t necessarily think we should be giving people free training, since politicians already pay their own advisors and us muggins taxpayers pay for the public service. But I do see problems with the current model.

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The advisors they employ directly are part of the political machinery. They tend to come with pre-programmed political biases and are keen to tell the politicians what they want to hear so they can keep their jobs and climb further up that greasy pole.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The public service bureaucracy still moves too slowly. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_100770&quot;&gt;ACMA&#039;s annual report for 2007–08&lt;/a&gt;, for example, was only published this week. Trying to steer the nation through a time of great change using that sort of document is like trying to drive a fast car by reading last week&#039;s newspaper reports of traffic jams. I&#039;ll have more to say about that another time.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;strong&gt;@Sean the Blogonaut:&lt;/strong&gt; Yeah, I saw the &lt;em&gt;Courier Mail&lt;/em&gt; piece, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,20797,24582570-952,00.html&quot;&gt;Web filter &#039;needed&#039; to protect kids from porn&lt;/a&gt;. I didn&#039;t see this so much as an attempt to change the debate, but simple the media exploring different angles as the story evolves -- though yes, some of the people quoted may be rent-a-pundits provided by PR companies.

I suspect also that the speed at which the hyperconnected Interne-based freedom of speech campaigners can move caught &quot;the other side&quot; off guard, and they&#039;re responding now that the discussion has reached &quot;the mainstream media&quot;. It&#039;ll be interesting to see how it unfolds from here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Allison Reynolds:</strong> Politicians have to cover such a huge range of different topics that they simply <em>have</em> to rely on their advisors to, well, advise them.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t necessarily think we should be giving people free training, since politicians already pay their own advisors and us muggins taxpayers pay for the public service. But I do see problems with the current model.</p>
<ol>
<li>The advisors they employ directly are part of the political machinery. They tend to come with pre-programmed political biases and are keen to tell the politicians what they want to hear so they can keep their jobs and climb further up that greasy pole.</li>
<li>The public service bureaucracy still moves too slowly. The <a href="http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_100770">ACMA&#8217;s annual report for 2007–08</a>, for example, was only published this week. Trying to steer the nation through a time of great change using that sort of document is like trying to drive a fast car by reading last week&#8217;s newspaper reports of traffic jams. I&#8217;ll have more to say about that another time.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>@Sean the Blogonaut:</strong> Yeah, I saw the <em>Courier Mail</em> piece, <a href="http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,20797,24582570-952,00.html">Web filter &#8216;needed&#8217; to protect kids from porn</a>. I didn&#8217;t see this so much as an attempt to change the debate, but simple the media exploring different angles as the story evolves &#8212; though yes, some of the people quoted may be rent-a-pundits provided by PR companies.</p>
<p>I suspect also that the speed at which the hyperconnected Interne-based freedom of speech campaigners can move caught &#8220;the other side&#8221; off guard, and they&#8217;re responding now that the discussion has reached &#8220;the mainstream media&#8221;. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how it unfolds from here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean the Blogonaut</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/#comment-14427</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean the Blogonaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 04:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2476#comment-14427</guid>
		<description>I note that in the Courier Mail that the appears to be an attempt to change the debate to one of protecting children from legal porn.  Michael Carr-Gregg has come out in support of the ISP filtering as he claims we are seeing a rise in children performing sex acts on other children due to having watched porn on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note that in the Courier Mail that the appears to be an attempt to change the debate to one of protecting children from legal porn.  Michael Carr-Gregg has come out in support of the ISP filtering as he claims we are seeing a rise in children performing sex acts on other children due to having watched porn on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/conroy-thoroughly-tangled-in-his-own-rabbit-proof-firewall/#comment-14419</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2476#comment-14419</guid>
		<description>100% right it&#039;s the old bastards in Canberraaaa (and state capitals) that don&#039;t have a clue. 

I rather think that we the netizens should be offering free and accessible training to these people so they understand the world we now live in. ICanHasCheezBurger101 if you get my drift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% right it&#8217;s the old bastards in Canberraaaa (and state capitals) that don&#8217;t have a clue. </p>
<p>I rather think that we the netizens should be offering free and accessible training to these people so they understand the world we now live in. ICanHasCheezBurger101 if you get my drift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

