<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crikey: Conroy&#8217;s really bad week #347</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/crikey-conroys-really-bad-week-347/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/crikey-conroys-really-bad-week-347/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:24:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/crikey-conroys-really-bad-week-347/#comment-16787</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=3790#comment-16787</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Crispin:&lt;/strong&gt; I imagine that Kevin Rudd wouldn&#039;t like being made to look the fool. But he&#039;s also made of stronger stuff than to be mortified by a little ridicule. The only way to &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; hurt a politician is to hurt their chances of re-election. With the Rudd government still doing just fine in the polls, thank you, he really doesn&#039;t care.

The latest Newspoll has &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/03/23/newspoll-56-44-9&quot;&gt;Labor&#039;s two-party lead steady at 56-44&lt;/a&gt;. Kevin Rudd&#039;s preferred prime minister rating is up four points to 65%, and Malcolm Turnbull&#039;s is down one to 21%. He can afford to tell Senator Conroy to STFU and do his job. For now, anyway.

As I said in my &lt;em&gt;Crikey&lt;/em&gt; piece, &lt;em&gt;Q&amp;A&lt;/em&gt; was Senator Conroy’s big chance to tell Australia, clearly and simply, live and unedited, precisely what was being planned. He blew it.

But he gets a second chance!

The SBS program &lt;em&gt;Insight&lt;/em&gt;&#039;s next edition is &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.sbs.com.au/insight/episode/index/id/59&quot;&gt;&quot;Blocking the Net&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, with Senator Conroy as a key guest. Tuesday 31 March at 7.30pm, repeated Friday at 1.30pm and Monday at 3.30pm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Crispin:</strong> I imagine that Kevin Rudd wouldn&#8217;t like being made to look the fool. But he&#8217;s also made of stronger stuff than to be mortified by a little ridicule. The only way to <em>really</em> hurt a politician is to hurt their chances of re-election. With the Rudd government still doing just fine in the polls, thank you, he really doesn&#8217;t care.</p>
<p>The latest Newspoll has <a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2009/03/23/newspoll-56-44-9">Labor&#8217;s two-party lead steady at 56-44</a>. Kevin Rudd&#8217;s preferred prime minister rating is up four points to 65%, and Malcolm Turnbull&#8217;s is down one to 21%. He can afford to tell Senator Conroy to STFU and do his job. For now, anyway.</p>
<p>As I said in my <em>Crikey</em> piece, <em>Q&#038;A</em> was Senator Conroy’s big chance to tell Australia, clearly and simply, live and unedited, precisely what was being planned. He blew it.</p>
<p>But he gets a second chance!</p>
<p>The SBS program <em>Insight</em>&#8216;s next edition is <a href="http://news.sbs.com.au/insight/episode/index/id/59">&#8220;Blocking the Net&#8221;</a>, with Senator Conroy as a key guest. Tuesday 31 March at 7.30pm, repeated Friday at 1.30pm and Monday at 3.30pm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crispin</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/crikey-conroys-really-bad-week-347/#comment-16785</link>
		<dc:creator>Crispin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=3790#comment-16785</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Stil:&lt;/strong&gt; On exactly that point, is it worth turning some of the ire towards the Chairman himself? In that doing so may have a couple of beneficial effects:

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Making the pain felt where it actually hurts -- on the PM&#039;s popularity. (And in fact, would this even work?)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Leaving Senator Conroy to do some of the things that we actually WANT him to do (like deal with Telstra etc)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Stil:</strong> On exactly that point, is it worth turning some of the ire towards the Chairman himself? In that doing so may have a couple of beneficial effects:</p>
<ol>
<li>Making the pain felt where it actually hurts &#8212; on the PM&#8217;s popularity. (And in fact, would this even work?)</li>
<li>Leaving Senator Conroy to do some of the things that we actually WANT him to do (like deal with Telstra etc)</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/crikey-conroys-really-bad-week-347/#comment-16773</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=3790#comment-16773</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Cameron:&lt;/strong&gt; There&#039;s certainly been been reports that Kevin Rudd&#039;s management style is even more centralised and control-freaky than John Howard&#039;s ever was. If the Internet filter is identified with Conroy -- which it certainly is, and I&#039;ve helped that along by calling it &quot;Conroy&#039;s Rabbit-Proof Firewall&quot; -- then he can be made the scapegoat in an instant. Conroy isn&#039;t stupid. Far from it. He&#039;ll know that&#039;s where he stands. Poor sod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Cameron:</strong> There&#8217;s certainly been been reports that Kevin Rudd&#8217;s management style is even more centralised and control-freaky than John Howard&#8217;s ever was. If the Internet filter is identified with Conroy &#8212; which it certainly is, and I&#8217;ve helped that along by calling it &#8220;Conroy&#8217;s Rabbit-Proof Firewall&#8221; &#8212; then he can be made the scapegoat in an instant. Conroy isn&#8217;t stupid. Far from it. He&#8217;ll know that&#8217;s where he stands. Poor sod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/crikey-conroys-really-bad-week-347/#comment-16772</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=3790#comment-16772</guid>
		<description>Your last comment raises a good question, should our focus be on K Rudd himself. Whether he is actually instructing Conroy to go ahead or not is not important, the buck stops with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your last comment raises a good question, should our focus be on K Rudd himself. Whether he is actually instructing Conroy to go ahead or not is not important, the buck stops with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

