<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Ms Kate Ellis, MP&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/dear-kate-ellis-mp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/dear-kate-ellis-mp/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:41:05 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dnosauria &#187; Flirting with Absurdity:</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/dear-kate-ellis-mp/#comment-15061</link>
		<dc:creator>Dnosauria &#187; Flirting with Absurdity:</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 06:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2429#comment-15061</guid>
		<description>[...] him. If you&#8217;re not confident writing a letter, there are plenty of templates around: 1, 2, 3, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] him. If you&#8217;re not confident writing a letter, there are plenty of templates around: 1, 2, 3, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great Australian Firewall and Free Australia Wireless :: Nathanael Boehm on the Internet, web UX design, social networking ...</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/dear-kate-ellis-mp/#comment-14446</link>
		<dc:creator>Great Australian Firewall and Free Australia Wireless :: Nathanael Boehm on the Internet, web UX design, social networking ...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 10:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2429#comment-14446</guid>
		<description>[...] hope you&#8217;ve written to your Member of Parliament and signed the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hope you&#8217;ve written to your Member of Parliament and signed the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; Dear Mr Albanese, Internet censorship trials must stop</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/dear-kate-ellis-mp/#comment-14407</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; Dear Mr Albanese, Internet censorship trials must stop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2429#comment-14407</guid>
		<description>[...] to feed &#8249; Dear Ms Kate Ellis, MP&#8230; &#160;&#8226;&#160; And this week&#8217;s Cnut is&#8230;? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to feed &lsaquo; Dear Ms Kate Ellis, MP&#8230; &nbsp;&bull;&nbsp; And this week&#8217;s Cnut is&#8230;? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acidlabs &#187; The Great Firewall of&#160;Canberra</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/dear-kate-ellis-mp/#comment-14378</link>
		<dc:creator>acidlabs &#187; The Great Firewall of&#160;Canberra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2429#comment-14378</guid>
		<description>[...] explore the excellent critical thinking by members of Australia&#8217;s digital community - Gavin Heaton, Peter Black, Stilgherrian (1,&#160;2) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] explore the excellent critical thinking by members of Australia&#8217;s digital community &#8211; Gavin Heaton, Peter Black, Stilgherrian (1,&nbsp;2) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/dear-kate-ellis-mp/#comment-14367</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2429#comment-14367</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Alastair:&lt;/strong&gt; Link fixed. And thanks for re-pimping your &lt;a href=&quot;http://girtby.net/archives/2008/7/31/bayes-theorem-1-mandatory-filtering-0&quot;&gt;amateur Bayesian analysis&lt;/a&gt;. I was meaning to re-link to that and forgot. Yours is a powerful argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Alastair:</strong> Link fixed. And thanks for re-pimping your <a href="http://girtby.net/archives/2008/7/31/bayes-theorem-1-mandatory-filtering-0">amateur Bayesian analysis</a>. I was meaning to re-link to that and forgot. Yours is a powerful argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alastair</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/dear-kate-ellis-mp/#comment-14366</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2429#comment-14366</guid>
		<description>Agree, a nice rant. Not sure it&#039;s of the form that MPs are used to receiving, or even responding to, but there it is. Keep us updated.

On the subject of false positives, it&#039;s worth pointing out that while 3% sounds like a very low rate, it is incredibly high compared to the rate of incidence of inappropriate material out there. Pardon the link pimping, but I did a bit of &lt;a href=&quot;http://girtby.net/archives/2008/7/31/bayes-theorem-1-mandatory-filtering-0&quot;&gt;amateur Bayesian analysis on this&lt;/a&gt; a while back, and found that with these figures you can quite easily determine that &lt;b&gt;inappropriate material would comprise 50% or less of blocked sites&lt;/b&gt;.

[Also note the last link in the article is broken; &quot;ttp&quot; instead of &quot;http&quot;...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree, a nice rant. Not sure it&#8217;s of the form that MPs are used to receiving, or even responding to, but there it is. Keep us updated.</p>
<p>On the subject of false positives, it&#8217;s worth pointing out that while 3% sounds like a very low rate, it is incredibly high compared to the rate of incidence of inappropriate material out there. Pardon the link pimping, but I did a bit of <a href="http://girtby.net/archives/2008/7/31/bayes-theorem-1-mandatory-filtering-0">amateur Bayesian analysis on this</a> a while back, and found that with these figures you can quite easily determine that <b>inappropriate material would comprise 50% or less of blocked sites</b>.</p>
<p>[Also note the last link in the article is broken; "ttp" instead of "http"...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
