<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drop that goddam Citizenship Test, Senator Evans!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/drop-that-goddam-citizenship-test-senator-evans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/drop-that-goddam-citizenship-test-senator-evans/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 21:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/drop-that-goddam-citizenship-test-senator-evans/#comment-12587</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 03:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1554#comment-12587</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@jason:&lt;/strong&gt; I&#039;m not against tests. I&#039;m against tests that don&#039;t actually deliver an analysis of whatever it is the test is supposed to be measuring. Joined-up logic etc. But of course we&#039;ve been here before... let&#039;s not repeat ourselves.

Instead, I&#039;ll quote Petro Georgiou, Liberal Member for Kooyong, from yesterday&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Crikey&lt;/em&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;What I have seen of the content and operation of the new citizenship test confirms the fears I expressed before it was introduced -- it’s an unreasonable and unfair barrier for prospective citizens. The number of people applying has plummeted to lower levels than we’ve had for a decade, which indicates that its impact has been social exclusion rather than inclusion. I am pleased the review committee’s terms of reference are broad and the members known to me -- Richard Woolcott, Paula Masselos and Professor Kim Rubinstein -- are of high calibre. At the very least, I anticipate the committee will pinpoint the harshest and most arbitrary features that need to be changed, and recommend more assistance for those most seriously disadvantaged by the new regime. I would like to see the restoration of the previous test, which served us well for decades and was scrapped without sound reasons.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There&#039;s an interesting list!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@jason:</strong> I&#8217;m not against tests. I&#8217;m against tests that don&#8217;t actually deliver an analysis of whatever it is the test is supposed to be measuring. Joined-up logic etc. But of course we&#8217;ve been here before&#8230; let&#8217;s not repeat ourselves.</p>
<p>Instead, I&#8217;ll quote Petro Georgiou, Liberal Member for Kooyong, from yesterday&#8217;s <em>Crikey</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>What I have seen of the content and operation of the new citizenship test confirms the fears I expressed before it was introduced &#8212; it’s an unreasonable and unfair barrier for prospective citizens. The number of people applying has plummeted to lower levels than we’ve had for a decade, which indicates that its impact has been social exclusion rather than inclusion. I am pleased the review committee’s terms of reference are broad and the members known to me &#8212; Richard Woolcott, Paula Masselos and Professor Kim Rubinstein &#8212; are of high calibre. At the very least, I anticipate the committee will pinpoint the harshest and most arbitrary features that need to be changed, and recommend more assistance for those most seriously disadvantaged by the new regime. I would like to see the restoration of the previous test, which served us well for decades and was scrapped without sound reasons.</p></blockquote>
<p>There&#8217;s an interesting list!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/drop-that-goddam-citizenship-test-senator-evans/#comment-12570</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1554#comment-12570</guid>
		<description>And while we&#039;re at it, let&#039;s drop school exams, everyone knows they don&#039;t prove anything. And airport photo ID checks - since when does that prove anything?

So many things to drop to make our lives easier.

Really, if someone can&#039;t make the effort to pass that test then why let them in? On one hand it&#039;s supposedly massively easy and basic, and on the other hand people are &quot;scared&quot; of it.  Weird. 

Sounds like a tofu eating, pot smoking, dole bludging, limp wristed, daisy chained leftist beat up to me!

Oh, I just described myself. Is there an authority I can hand myself into?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And while we&#8217;re at it, let&#8217;s drop school exams, everyone knows they don&#8217;t prove anything. And airport photo ID checks &#8211; since when does that prove anything?</p>
<p>So many things to drop to make our lives easier.</p>
<p>Really, if someone can&#8217;t make the effort to pass that test then why let them in? On one hand it&#8217;s supposedly massively easy and basic, and on the other hand people are &#8220;scared&#8221; of it.  Weird. </p>
<p>Sounds like a tofu eating, pot smoking, dole bludging, limp wristed, daisy chained leftist beat up to me!</p>
<p>Oh, I just described myself. Is there an authority I can hand myself into?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

