<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enlightenment is about Conversation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/enlightenment_is_about_conversation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/enlightenment_is_about_conversation/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:24:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; My Australia 2020 application&#8230; done!</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/enlightenment_is_about_conversation/#comment-11158</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; My Australia 2020 application&#8230; done!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/politics/enlightenment_is_about_conversation/#comment-11158</guid>
		<description>[...] Enlightenment is about Conversation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Enlightenment is about Conversation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; Australia, let the Enlightenment begin!</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/enlightenment_is_about_conversation/#comment-10937</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; Australia, let the Enlightenment begin!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/politics/enlightenment_is_about_conversation/#comment-10937</guid>
		<description>[...] other day I quoted an historian who said that the Prussian enlightenment [of the 18th century] was about conversation. &#8220;It was about a critical, respectful, open-ended dialogue between free and autonomous [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other day I quoted an historian who said that the Prussian enlightenment [of the 18th century] was about conversation. &#8220;It was about a critical, respectful, open-ended dialogue between free and autonomous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/enlightenment_is_about_conversation/#comment-10513</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/politics/enlightenment_is_about_conversation/#comment-10513</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Nick Hodge:&lt;/strong&gt; Further on in &lt;em&gt;Iron Kingdom&lt;/em&gt; it says:

&lt;blockquote&gt;A study of the &lt;em&gt;Berlin Monthly&lt;/em&gt; showed that of all the contributors to the journal over the thirteen years of its existence (1783-96), 15 per cent were noblemen, 27 per cent were professors and school teachers, 20 per cent were senior officials, 17 per cent were clergy, and 3.3 per cent were army officers. In other words, more than half of the contributors were in paid state employment.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

On the religious angle, originally the discussion groups -- of which there were around 200 across Prussia -- banned religion as a topic which risked stirring &quot;divisive passions&quot;. Yes, that changed in the following years -- and your ancestors and mine found their way to South Australia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Nick Hodge:</strong> Further on in <em>Iron Kingdom</em> it says:</p>
<blockquote><p>A study of the <em>Berlin Monthly</em> showed that of all the contributors to the journal over the thirteen years of its existence (1783-96), 15 per cent were noblemen, 27 per cent were professors and school teachers, 20 per cent were senior officials, 17 per cent were clergy, and 3.3 per cent were army officers. In other words, more than half of the contributors were in paid state employment.</p></blockquote>
<p>On the religious angle, originally the discussion groups &#8212; of which there were around 200 across Prussia &#8212; banned religion as a topic which risked stirring &#8220;divisive passions&#8221;. Yes, that changed in the following years &#8212; and your ancestors and mine found their way to South Australia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hodge</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/enlightenment_is_about_conversation/#comment-10492</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Hodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/politics/enlightenment_is_about_conversation/#comment-10492</guid>
		<description>In Prussian society who was doing the conversing? the annointed &quot;von Trapps&quot; style nobility or the common man?

Also interesting to note that my ancestors fled the state-instituted religion in the mid 19th century due to the conversation going religious.

What a funny world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Prussian society who was doing the conversing? the annointed &#8220;von Trapps&#8221; style nobility or the common man?</p>
<p>Also interesting to note that my ancestors fled the state-instituted religion in the mid 19th century due to the conversation going religious.</p>
<p>What a funny world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

