<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Even in defeat, he haunts us&#8230; via our folksonomies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/even_in_defeat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/even_in_defeat/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:24:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; The nightmare of John Howard finally subsides</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/even_in_defeat/#comment-16910</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; The nightmare of John Howard finally subsides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/politics/even_in_defeat/#comment-16910</guid>
		<description>[...] months ago, just after the Rudd government came to power, one name dominated this website&#8217;s tag cloud. Out of 944 posts, 91 were tagged “john howard”. Finally, that&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] months ago, just after the Rudd government came to power, one name dominated this website&#8217;s tag cloud. Out of 944 posts, 91 were tagged “john howard”. Finally, that&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/even_in_defeat/#comment-10716</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/politics/even_in_defeat/#comment-10716</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Quatrefoil:&lt;/strong&gt; Yes, controlled vocabularies only work when everyone is properly trained in their use. That is, when information was all produced and distributed by &quot;professionals&quot;. With the production tools in the hands of &quot;everyone&quot;, Everything Changes&#8482;.

Google &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; do synonym matching, but invisibly. You can turn it off if you want. However Google searches the full content, not just the keywords. &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=Dh0MNIFezME&quot;&gt;Will the foreigners know who&#039;s really saying &quot;Sorry&quot;&lt;/a&gt;?

&quot;John Howard&quot; is always &quot;John Howard&quot;, unless he&#039;s the other &quot;John Howard&quot;, the actor. Does &quot;opera&quot; refer to a staged musical production, or a certain web browser?

This has always been, and always will be, a hard problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Quatrefoil:</strong> Yes, controlled vocabularies only work when everyone is properly trained in their use. That is, when information was all produced and distributed by &#8220;professionals&#8221;. With the production tools in the hands of &#8220;everyone&#8221;, Everything Changes&trade;.</p>
<p>Google <em>does</em> do synonym matching, but invisibly. You can turn it off if you want. However Google searches the full content, not just the keywords. <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=Dh0MNIFezME">Will the foreigners know who&#8217;s really saying &#8220;Sorry&#8221;</a>?</p>
<p>&#8220;John Howard&#8221; is always &#8220;John Howard&#8221;, unless he&#8217;s the other &#8220;John Howard&#8221;, the actor. Does &#8220;opera&#8221; refer to a staged musical production, or a certain web browser?</p>
<p>This has always been, and always will be, a hard problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quatrefoil</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/even_in_defeat/#comment-10700</link>
		<dc:creator>Quatrefoil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 23:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/politics/even_in_defeat/#comment-10700</guid>
		<description>The problem with controlled vocabularies is always that what you call a spade I call a shovel.  That was solved in the olden days to some extent by &#039;see&#039; references, which meant that when I looked up spade, I&#039;d get a nice little note to &#039;see shovel&#039;, or perhaps a reference to a broader or related term, &#039;see also entrenching tools&#039;.  Interestingly, Google doesn&#039;t do that, so we have to be cluey enough to come up with the synonyms on our own and we seem to be managing quite nicely.  

Tagging your own input without recourse to a thesaurus of preferred terms or the ability to use see references means that you&#039;re likely to call the same thing different names some of the time, meaning that you&#039;ll get, say 45 hits for &#039;spade&#039; and 44 hits for &#039;shovel&#039; so they&#039;ll feature lower on the list than &#039;John Howard&#039; who is always &#039;John Howard&#039;, unless of course you also use &#039;lying rodent&#039; as a tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with controlled vocabularies is always that what you call a spade I call a shovel.  That was solved in the olden days to some extent by &#8216;see&#8217; references, which meant that when I looked up spade, I&#8217;d get a nice little note to &#8216;see shovel&#8217;, or perhaps a reference to a broader or related term, &#8216;see also entrenching tools&#8217;.  Interestingly, Google doesn&#8217;t do that, so we have to be cluey enough to come up with the synonyms on our own and we seem to be managing quite nicely.  </p>
<p>Tagging your own input without recourse to a thesaurus of preferred terms or the ability to use see references means that you&#8217;re likely to call the same thing different names some of the time, meaning that you&#8217;ll get, say 45 hits for &#8216;spade&#8217; and 44 hits for &#8216;shovel&#8217; so they&#8217;ll feature lower on the list than &#8216;John Howard&#8217; who is always &#8216;John Howard&#8217;, unless of course you also use &#8216;lying rodent&#8217; as a tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

