<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: @KevinRuddPM isn&#8217;t really Kevin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/kevinruddpm-isnt-really-kevin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/kevinruddpm-isnt-really-kevin/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:45:11 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/kevinruddpm-isnt-really-kevin/#comment-14642</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2696#comment-14642</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@Stilgherrian &amp; Sean the Blogonaut:&lt;/b&gt; I wholeheartedly agree that the 140-character format is a second language to just about all of us. I keep learning that the reason advertising copywriters usually earn so much, is because writing &lt;i&gt;meaningful&lt;/i&gt; prose with only a thimbleful of words is such an irrational art of reduction.

I wish I could do it well.
Half of that paragraph could probably go as it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@Stilgherrian &amp; Sean the Blogonaut:</b> I wholeheartedly agree that the 140-character format is a second language to just about all of us. I keep learning that the reason advertising copywriters usually earn so much, is because writing <i>meaningful</i> prose with only a thimbleful of words is such an irrational art of reduction.</p>
<p>I wish I could do it well.<br />
Half of that paragraph could probably go as it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/kevinruddpm-isnt-really-kevin/#comment-14630</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2696#comment-14630</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Sean the Blogonaut:&lt;/strong&gt; For you, me, and everyone else over the age of 10, writing in 140-characters-or-less is a second language. We are not native speakers. For anyone currently under the age of 10, this is just one of the natural forms of English which they grew up with, and they&#039;ll rapidly develop their own forms which us old fogies will find weird.

I&#039;d already read somewhere else that the distinctiveness of Australian English pronunciation was set not so much by the mix of English, Irish and Scottish immigrants (convicts and their guards and administrators) in the first wave, but by their children developing their own common form. Twitter, or whichever &quot;ambient intimacy&quot; tool(s) become standard, will be no different.

And as an aside, I reckon these forms will continue to use the 140-character limit as a common base, even when they move into technologies which won&#039;t require that limit, for the same reason that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_gauge&quot;&gt;standard railway gauge&lt;/a&gt; of 4 feet 8.5 inches is (roughly) what it is due to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2538/was-standard-railroad-gauge-48-determined-by-roman-chariot-ruts&quot;&gt;the physical constraints of horse-drawn vehicles&lt;/a&gt; even though horses are no longer involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Sean the Blogonaut:</strong> For you, me, and everyone else over the age of 10, writing in 140-characters-or-less is a second language. We are not native speakers. For anyone currently under the age of 10, this is just one of the natural forms of English which they grew up with, and they&#8217;ll rapidly develop their own forms which us old fogies will find weird.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d already read somewhere else that the distinctiveness of Australian English pronunciation was set not so much by the mix of English, Irish and Scottish immigrants (convicts and their guards and administrators) in the first wave, but by their children developing their own common form. Twitter, or whichever &#8220;ambient intimacy&#8221; tool(s) become standard, will be no different.</p>
<p>And as an aside, I reckon these forms will continue to use the 140-character limit as a common base, even when they move into technologies which won&#8217;t require that limit, for the same reason that the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_gauge">standard railway gauge</a> of 4 feet 8.5 inches is (roughly) what it is due to <a href="http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2538/was-standard-railroad-gauge-48-determined-by-roman-chariot-ruts">the physical constraints of horse-drawn vehicles</a> even though horses are no longer involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean the Blogonaut</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/kevinruddpm-isnt-really-kevin/#comment-14629</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean the Blogonaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2696#comment-14629</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Stilgherrian:&lt;/strong&gt; Maybe emotionless is not the right word.   Emotionally shallow?  At least for me (perhaps this more my perception).  I suppose that with sufficient practise, the shortness of form could engender poetic qualities much like Haiku</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Stilgherrian:</strong> Maybe emotionless is not the right word.   Emotionally shallow?  At least for me (perhaps this more my perception).  I suppose that with sufficient practise, the shortness of form could engender poetic qualities much like Haiku</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/kevinruddpm-isnt-really-kevin/#comment-14623</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 02:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2696#comment-14623</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Sean the Blogonaut:&lt;/strong&gt; I disagree that Twitter is &quot;an emotionless medium&quot;. Expressing emotions in 140 characters or less is certainly a challenge. But emotions are such a core part of being a mammal -- indeed, being a vertebrate as emotions come from that part of us sometimes called &quot;the reptilian brain&quot; -- that we&#039;re already hard-wired to seek out emotional subtexts in almost every communication.

Some of us are better than others at both creating and reading those emotional signals, of course. Rudd&#039;s background is similar to mine -- grew up on a dairy farm and learned the value of hard work, lost his father before adolescence -- and so he&#039;ll similarly feel the need to be &quot;in control&quot; of the outward expression of his emotions. Nevertheless, they &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; emerge.

Of course if the spin doctors take over and try to ensure that every little tweet is &quot;on message&quot;, the recipients will soon tired of the artificiality and attention will move on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Sean the Blogonaut:</strong> I disagree that Twitter is &#8220;an emotionless medium&#8221;. Expressing emotions in 140 characters or less is certainly a challenge. But emotions are such a core part of being a mammal &#8212; indeed, being a vertebrate as emotions come from that part of us sometimes called &#8220;the reptilian brain&#8221; &#8212; that we&#8217;re already hard-wired to seek out emotional subtexts in almost every communication.</p>
<p>Some of us are better than others at both creating and reading those emotional signals, of course. Rudd&#8217;s background is similar to mine &#8212; grew up on a dairy farm and learned the value of hard work, lost his father before adolescence &#8212; and so he&#8217;ll similarly feel the need to be &#8220;in control&#8221; of the outward expression of his emotions. Nevertheless, they <em>will</em> emerge.</p>
<p>Of course if the spin doctors take over and try to ensure that every little tweet is &#8220;on message&#8221;, the recipients will soon tired of the artificiality and attention will move on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; Crikey: @KevinRuddPM stumbles into the Twitterverse</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/kevinruddpm-isnt-really-kevin/#comment-14621</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; Crikey: @KevinRuddPM stumbles into the Twitterverse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 23:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2696#comment-14621</guid>
		<description>[...] published in Crikey on Friday. It covers much the same material as my previous three posts [1, 2, 3] but for a general non-Twitter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] published in Crikey on Friday. It covers much the same material as my previous three posts [1, 2, 3] but for a general non-Twitter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean the Blogonaut</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/kevinruddpm-isnt-really-kevin/#comment-14616</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean the Blogonaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2696#comment-14616</guid>
		<description>When the man manages to sound so vacant in any of his addresses to MSM, expecting him to be anything more in an emotionless medium is asking too much.

Perhaps the same people who are advising Kev on his social media interaction are advising conroy?

Howard devalued and usurped &quot;mateship&quot; to the point where I gagged everytime he memtioned it, Kevin will do thesame with social media.  He&#039;s no more interested in engaging with the Austalian public than Howard was sincere about mateship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the man manages to sound so vacant in any of his addresses to MSM, expecting him to be anything more in an emotionless medium is asking too much.</p>
<p>Perhaps the same people who are advising Kev on his social media interaction are advising conroy?</p>
<p>Howard devalued and usurped &#8220;mateship&#8221; to the point where I gagged everytime he memtioned it, Kevin will do thesame with social media.  He&#8217;s no more interested in engaging with the Austalian public than Howard was sincere about mateship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/kevinruddpm-isnt-really-kevin/#comment-14611</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2696#comment-14611</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@yewenyi:&lt;/strong&gt; Ah, but there is &lt;em&gt;already&lt;/em&gt; a &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/kevinrudd&quot;&gt;fake Kevin Rudd Twitter account&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@yewenyi:</strong> Ah, but there is <em>already</em> a <a href="http://twitter.com/kevinrudd">fake Kevin Rudd Twitter account</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yewenyi</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/kevinruddpm-isnt-really-kevin/#comment-14610</link>
		<dc:creator>yewenyi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 01:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2696#comment-14610</guid>
		<description>someone needs to do a fake kevin rudd twitter account, like there was once a blog for jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>someone needs to do a fake kevin rudd twitter account, like there was once a blog for jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/kevinruddpm-isnt-really-kevin/#comment-14599</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2696#comment-14599</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@hackpacker:&lt;/strong&gt; It&#039;s unfortunate for Kevin Rudd&#039;s team and its social media credibility that the new website and Twitter account went live just as the PM left for the G20 summit -- but then in the busy life of Chairman Rudd when &lt;em&gt;would&lt;/em&gt; be a suitably quiet time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@hackpacker:</strong> It&#8217;s unfortunate for Kevin Rudd&#8217;s team and its social media credibility that the new website and Twitter account went live just as the PM left for the G20 summit &#8212; but then in the busy life of Chairman Rudd when <em>would</em> be a suitably quiet time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hackpacker</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/kevinruddpm-isnt-really-kevin/#comment-14598</link>
		<dc:creator>hackpacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2696#comment-14598</guid>
		<description>Will there be return traffic? Seems like K-Rudd hasn&#039;t got much to say and his new site is looking thin after the Kevin 07 hysteria. Perhaps it&#039;s just building an awesome content strategy to be unveiled in the days to come... or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will there be return traffic? Seems like K-Rudd hasn&#8217;t got much to say and his new site is looking thin after the Kevin 07 hysteria. Perhaps it&#8217;s just building an awesome content strategy to be unveiled in the days to come&#8230; or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/kevinruddpm-isnt-really-kevin/#comment-14597</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2696#comment-14597</guid>
		<description>We now know that &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/KevinRuddPM&quot;&gt;@KevinRuddPM&lt;/a&gt; lost followers on Wednesday night because of Twitter&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_twitter_anti-spam_bot_causes_chaos.php&quot;&gt;overly-zealous anti-spam robot&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We now know that <a href="http://twitter.com/KevinRuddPM">@KevinRuddPM</a> lost followers on Wednesday night because of Twitter&#8217;s <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_twitter_anti-spam_bot_causes_chaos.php">overly-zealous anti-spam robot</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beyond The Fringe &#187; Blog Archive &#187; @KevinRuddPM in a Twatty Twitter</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/kevinruddpm-isnt-really-kevin/#comment-14596</link>
		<dc:creator>Beyond The Fringe &#187; Blog Archive &#187; @KevinRuddPM in a Twatty Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=2696#comment-14596</guid>
		<description>[...] than the man himself and which include direct, pertinent responses to his followers, Kevin and his Twittering Team have managed just 7 flaccid, dead fish declarations, and no public responses. Twice, his eager [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than the man himself and which include direct, pertinent responses to his followers, Kevin and his Twittering Team have managed just 7 flaccid, dead fish declarations, and no public responses. Twice, his eager [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
