<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Passive-aggressive bullshit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/passive-aggressive-bullshit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/passive-aggressive-bullshit/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Quatrefoil</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/passive-aggressive-bullshit/#comment-12628</link>
		<dc:creator>Quatrefoil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 23:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1572#comment-12628</guid>
		<description>The rhetoric of the 'family' is really starting to get up my nose, to the point that there's a serious essay brewing.  Aside from the question of what actually constitutes a family anyway, the assumption behind it is that people who aren't in families (for which I think you can read families with children at home) don't count.  Could we stop talking about 'working families' and start talking about 'working people'?  Julia Gillard, of all people, should know better.  All of the stuff about work-life balance and needing to make ends meet applies to people without kids too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rhetoric of the &#8216;family&#8217; is really starting to get up my nose, to the point that there&#8217;s a serious essay brewing.  Aside from the question of what actually constitutes a family anyway, the assumption behind it is that people who aren&#8217;t in families (for which I think you can read families with children at home) don&#8217;t count.  Could we stop talking about &#8216;working families&#8217; and start talking about &#8216;working people&#8217;?  Julia Gillard, of all people, should know better.  All of the stuff about work-life balance and needing to make ends meet applies to people without kids too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/passive-aggressive-bullshit/#comment-12625</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 21:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1572#comment-12625</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@bernand:&lt;/strong&gt; The current political phrase is "working families". &lt;em&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/em&gt; says &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardworking_families"&gt;the phase originated in UK politics in about 1995&lt;/a&gt; Its usage is a propaganda technique known as a &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glittering_generality"&gt;glittering generality&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@bernand:</strong> The current political phrase is &#8220;working families&#8221;. <em>Wikipedia</em> says <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardworking_families">the phase originated in UK politics in about 1995</a> Its usage is a propaganda technique known as a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glittering_generality">glittering generality</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernard</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/passive-aggressive-bullshit/#comment-12616</link>
		<dc:creator>bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 03:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1572#comment-12616</guid>
		<description>Actually, isn't the emphasis on "Hard working Aussie" families these days?
(and think one of the tags is not-quite-right)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, isn&#8217;t the emphasis on &#8220;Hard working Aussie&#8221; families these days?<br />
(and think one of the tags is not-quite-right)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
