<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Passive-aggressive bullshit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/passive-aggressive-bullshit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/passive-aggressive-bullshit/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:24:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quatrefoil</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/passive-aggressive-bullshit/#comment-12628</link>
		<dc:creator>Quatrefoil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 23:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1572#comment-12628</guid>
		<description>The rhetoric of the &#039;family&#039; is really starting to get up my nose, to the point that there&#039;s a serious essay brewing.  Aside from the question of what actually constitutes a family anyway, the assumption behind it is that people who aren&#039;t in families (for which I think you can read families with children at home) don&#039;t count.  Could we stop talking about &#039;working families&#039; and start talking about &#039;working people&#039;?  Julia Gillard, of all people, should know better.  All of the stuff about work-life balance and needing to make ends meet applies to people without kids too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rhetoric of the &#8216;family&#8217; is really starting to get up my nose, to the point that there&#8217;s a serious essay brewing.  Aside from the question of what actually constitutes a family anyway, the assumption behind it is that people who aren&#8217;t in families (for which I think you can read families with children at home) don&#8217;t count.  Could we stop talking about &#8216;working families&#8217; and start talking about &#8216;working people&#8217;?  Julia Gillard, of all people, should know better.  All of the stuff about work-life balance and needing to make ends meet applies to people without kids too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/passive-aggressive-bullshit/#comment-12625</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 21:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1572#comment-12625</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@bernand:&lt;/strong&gt; The current political phrase is &quot;working families&quot;. &lt;em&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/em&gt; says &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardworking_families&quot;&gt;the phase originated in UK politics in about 1995&lt;/a&gt; Its usage is a propaganda technique known as a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glittering_generality&quot;&gt;glittering generality&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@bernand:</strong> The current political phrase is &#8220;working families&#8221;. <em>Wikipedia</em> says <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardworking_families">the phase originated in UK politics in about 1995</a> Its usage is a propaganda technique known as a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glittering_generality">glittering generality</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernard</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/passive-aggressive-bullshit/#comment-12616</link>
		<dc:creator>bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 03:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1572#comment-12616</guid>
		<description>Actually, isn&#039;t the emphasis on &quot;Hard working Aussie&quot; families these days?
(and think one of the tags is not-quite-right)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, isn&#8217;t the emphasis on &#8220;Hard working Aussie&#8221; families these days?<br />
(and think one of the tags is not-quite-right)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

