<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;ll be PM on Wednesday?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/who_will_be_pm_wednesday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/who_will_be_pm_wednesday/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:24:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/who_will_be_pm_wednesday/#comment-8272</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/politics/who_will_be_pm_wednesday/#comment-8272</guid>
		<description>Just spotted by me, though published by &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.smh.com.au/newsblog/archives/annabel_crabb/015549.html&quot;&gt;Annabel Crabb&lt;/a&gt; this morning:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Malcolm Turnbull, speaking to Fran Kelly on Radio National this morning, gave a brilliant performance.

&lt;strong&gt;Asked twice whether Mr Howard was the Coalition&#039;s best chance, he fudged for Australia, giftedly wittering about the PM&#039;s record for several minutes before using that familiar form of words beloved of those in his situation: &#039;There is no challenge&#039;.&lt;/strong&gt;

Expect to hear more of that statement, with its dogged present tense, throughout the coming days.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

[Smirks]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just spotted by me, though published by <a href="http://blogs.smh.com.au/newsblog/archives/annabel_crabb/015549.html">Annabel Crabb</a> this morning:</p>
<blockquote><p>Malcolm Turnbull, speaking to Fran Kelly on Radio National this morning, gave a brilliant performance.</p>
<p><strong>Asked twice whether Mr Howard was the Coalition&#8217;s best chance, he fudged for Australia, giftedly wittering about the PM&#8217;s record for several minutes before using that familiar form of words beloved of those in his situation: &#8216;There is no challenge&#8217;.</strong></p>
<p>Expect to hear more of that statement, with its dogged present tense, throughout the coming days.</p></blockquote>
<p>[Smirks]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; Watching the government implode</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/who_will_be_pm_wednesday/#comment-8267</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; Watching the government implode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/politics/who_will_be_pm_wednesday/#comment-8267</guid>
		<description>[...] in the few hours since I suggested Malcolm Turnbull would be the Coalition&#8217;s best choice to fight a rearguard action, and about Howard&#8217;s submissive body language, there&#8217;s been two fascinating [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the few hours since I suggested Malcolm Turnbull would be the Coalition&#8217;s best choice to fight a rearguard action, and about Howard&#8217;s submissive body language, there&#8217;s been two fascinating [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/who_will_be_pm_wednesday/#comment-8261</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/politics/who_will_be_pm_wednesday/#comment-8261</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Snarky Platypus:&lt;/strong&gt; Oh, you shouldn&#039;t mention Julie Bishop again, you just &lt;em&gt;know&lt;/em&gt; I&#039;ll have to &lt;a href=&quot;http://stilgherrian.com/politics/julie_bishop_neocon_sex_kitten/&quot;&gt;link back to the relevant post&lt;/a&gt;.

Now, with that out of the way, yes you&#039;re right. The Liberal party, particularly under JWH, has become so socially conservative and so fearful of what a few loud-mouthed religious nutters say that they need a complete flush-through with a wire brush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Snarky Platypus:</strong> Oh, you shouldn&#8217;t mention Julie Bishop again, you just <em>know</em> I&#8217;ll have to <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/julie_bishop_neocon_sex_kitten/">link back to the relevant post</a>.</p>
<p>Now, with that out of the way, yes you&#8217;re right. The Liberal party, particularly under JWH, has become so socially conservative and so fearful of what a few loud-mouthed religious nutters say that they need a complete flush-through with a wire brush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snarky Platypus</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/politics/who_will_be_pm_wednesday/#comment-8258</link>
		<dc:creator>Snarky Platypus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/politics/who_will_be_pm_wednesday/#comment-8258</guid>
		<description>A poster on Pollbludger started spreading a false rumour around the blogtraps that Julie Bishop was going to get the nod and the media commentators fell for it!  

Mal is the best option, but I don&#039;t think the Libs party machine could handle it.  I think there needs to be some internal restructuring before you could have a genuine small &#039;l&#039; liberal heading the Coalition again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A poster on Pollbludger started spreading a false rumour around the blogtraps that Julie Bishop was going to get the nod and the media commentators fell for it!  </p>
<p>Mal is the best option, but I don&#8217;t think the Libs party machine could handle it.  I think there needs to be some internal restructuring before you could have a genuine small &#8216;l&#8217; liberal heading the Coalition again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

