<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jason Calacanis and the Evil Cult of the Internet Start-up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:35:10 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-13915</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-13915</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Stephen Stockwell:&lt;/strong&gt; I&#039;d never heard of Mirko Bagaric before quoting him in the previous comment, and as I write this I still no nothing more about him than what you&#039;ve just told me. There&#039;s an essay in here somewhere, though, about the logic of a message still being valid even if the messenger is otherwise unsavoury.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Stephen Stockwell:</strong> I&#8217;d never heard of Mirko Bagaric before quoting him in the previous comment, and as I write this I still no nothing more about him than what you&#8217;ve just told me. There&#8217;s an essay in here somewhere, though, about the logic of a message still being valid even if the messenger is otherwise unsavoury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-13911</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-13911</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;@Stilgherrian:&lt;/b&gt; The dust from this particular issue has settled by now, but in quoting Mirko Bagaric&#039;s opinion on, well, anything, really (given his in-principle support for torture and bizarre advocacy for capping legal abortions at one per female per lifetime) you risk entering very choppy waters, where common sense can vanish like a boat in the Bermuda Triangle. You&#039;re a good captain, but take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>@Stilgherrian:</b> The dust from this particular issue has settled by now, but in quoting Mirko Bagaric&#8217;s opinion on, well, anything, really (given his in-principle support for torture and bizarre advocacy for capping legal abortions at one per female per lifetime) you risk entering very choppy waters, where common sense can vanish like a boat in the Bermuda Triangle. You&#8217;re a good captain, but take care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-13045</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 19:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-13045</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@bernard:&lt;/strong&gt; Yeah there&#039;s a lot of material here. And I find I keep returning to it for inspiration, which says... something.

&lt;strong&gt;@Stephen Stockwell:&lt;/strong&gt; Jokes about our new Prime Minister being &quot;The Ruddbot&quot; have more than a ring of truth about them, eh? While burning the midnight oil is certainly a useful tactic for special situations, it simply isn&#039;t sustainable.

&quot;Rudd has spectacularly failed the exploitation test,&quot; says Mirko Bagaric in &lt;a href=&quot;http://business.theage.com.au/when-the-going-gets-tough-so-does-rudd-on-others-20080604-2lxa.html&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Age&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; today... and I&#039;ll quote more in &lt;a href=&quot;http://stilgherrian.com/politics/slavedriver-rudd-fails-the-exploitation-test/&quot;&gt;a fresh post&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@bernard:</strong> Yeah there&#8217;s a lot of material here. And I find I keep returning to it for inspiration, which says&#8230; something.</p>
<p><strong>@Stephen Stockwell:</strong> Jokes about our new Prime Minister being &#8220;The Ruddbot&#8221; have more than a ring of truth about them, eh? While burning the midnight oil is certainly a useful tactic for special situations, it simply isn&#8217;t sustainable.</p>
<p>&#8220;Rudd has spectacularly failed the exploitation test,&#8221; says Mirko Bagaric in <a href="http://business.theage.com.au/when-the-going-gets-tough-so-does-rudd-on-others-20080604-2lxa.html"><em>The Age</em></a> today&#8230; and I&#8217;ll quote more in <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/slavedriver-rudd-fails-the-exploitation-test/">a fresh post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-13041</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 01:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-13041</guid>
		<description>After the last week, would it be feasible to call Kevin Rudd the Australian Federal Government&#039;s answer to Jason Calacanis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the last week, would it be feasible to call Kevin Rudd the Australian Federal Government&#8217;s answer to Jason Calacanis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernard</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-12878</link>
		<dc:creator>bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 04:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-12878</guid>
		<description>phew!

The moon, the moon!

Enjoyed it, but didn&#039;t / couldn&#039;t absorb it all.

Will return later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phew!</p>
<p>The moon, the moon!</p>
<p>Enjoyed it, but didn&#8217;t / couldn&#8217;t absorb it all.</p>
<p>Will return later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Evil Cult of the Internet Start-up &#171; A Dog&#8217;s Breakfast, part II</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-12877</link>
		<dc:creator>The Evil Cult of the Internet Start-up &#171; A Dog&#8217;s Breakfast, part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 02:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-12877</guid>
		<description>[...] Stilgherrian · Jason Calacanis and the Evil Cult of the Internet Start-up   I strongly believe this to be a dangerous, toxic, anti-human attitude and it’s infecting others. It must be fought vigorously and with passion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stilgherrian · Jason Calacanis and the Evil Cult of the Internet Start-up   I strongly believe this to be a dangerous, toxic, anti-human attitude and it’s infecting others. It must be fought vigorously and with passion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; &#8220;Urgency is poisonous&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-12406</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; &#8220;Urgency is poisonous&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-12406</guid>
		<description>[...] it triggered a massive debate, and I wrote a follow-up comparing the Calacanis approach to an evil cult. Last week 37signals reckoned that urgency is poisonous. One thing I’ve come to realize is that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it triggered a massive debate, and I wrote a follow-up comparing the Calacanis approach to an evil cult. Last week 37signals reckoned that urgency is poisonous. One thing I’ve come to realize is that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11656</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11656</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Joypog:&lt;/strong&gt; Again, a wonderfully thoughtful comment. You can stay! Your point about flaunting wealth has triggered a few thoughts which will turn into an essay at some point. In brief, though, I&#039;ve already commented elsewhere that the main function of a MacBook Air is to show the world what a &lt;a href=&quot;http://eicolab.com.au/2008/03/12/macbook-air-selling-in-spite-of-missing-bits-%E2%80%93-the-soft-stuff-matters-most/#comment-1447&quot;&gt;wanker&lt;/a&gt; you are. Having three means you&#039;re just three times the wanker.

&quot;Look at me, I&#039;m better than you because I have more expensive cool stuff&quot; is an attitude which just shows how shallow one really is.

Sadly for him, Calacanis buying a Tesla failed to impress me. I didn&#039;t know that apart from being &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla&quot;&gt;a famous scientist&lt;/a&gt;, Tesla is also the name of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.teslamotors.com/&quot;&gt;an expensive electric car&lt;/a&gt;. Now that I know it exists, I&#039;ll have more to say about it later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Joypog:</strong> Again, a wonderfully thoughtful comment. You can stay! Your point about flaunting wealth has triggered a few thoughts which will turn into an essay at some point. In brief, though, I&#8217;ve already commented elsewhere that the main function of a MacBook Air is to show the world what a <a href="http://eicolab.com.au/2008/03/12/macbook-air-selling-in-spite-of-missing-bits-%E2%80%93-the-soft-stuff-matters-most/#comment-1447">wanker</a> you are. Having three means you&#8217;re just three times the wanker.</p>
<p>&#8220;Look at me, I&#8217;m better than you because I have more expensive cool stuff&#8221; is an attitude which just shows how shallow one really is.</p>
<p>Sadly for him, Calacanis buying a Tesla failed to impress me. I didn&#8217;t know that apart from being <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla">a famous scientist</a>, Tesla is also the name of <a href="http://www.teslamotors.com/">an expensive electric car</a>. Now that I know it exists, I&#8217;ll have more to say about it later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joypog</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11625</link>
		<dc:creator>Joypog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 02:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11625</guid>
		<description>Your last sentence brings up a good aside.  I think JC&#039;s comment was particularly inflammatory because he flaunts his wealth.  Even though I don’t begrudge him if he spends a lot of money, he has created an aura around him that resulted visceral reaction.  It is just unseemly that someone who brags about  pre-ordering a Tesla and buying 3 Airs can turn around and write in a dismissive tone that his employees must be workaholics.  It would have been one thing for Warren Buffet, who public persona is that of a person who lives as “regular” a life as the world’s second richest man can, to talk about the need for people to work hard.  

No doubt celebrity and showmanship are  a central component of JC&#039;s business advertising strategy, I would have never visited Mahalo except for his appearances on TWiT. But as you mentioned, there is a real danger behind JC’s (and many other Web startup impresarios’) cult of flamboyant personality around himself.  Many of these men have something to fall back on while their troops have nothing in reserve.  The ground floor startup workaholic does not have millions saved in the bank, when s/he burns themselves out, they have nothing to fall back on. The cult leaders are rich enough that they can burn themselves out – cause they can follow it up with a vacation to Tahiti.  If I burned myself out, I’d still have to get up tomorrow and look for a new job.

But then again, America and its uneasy relationship with celebrity (and the consequences of this liaison) is a whole &#039;nother can of worms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your last sentence brings up a good aside.  I think JC&#8217;s comment was particularly inflammatory because he flaunts his wealth.  Even though I don’t begrudge him if he spends a lot of money, he has created an aura around him that resulted visceral reaction.  It is just unseemly that someone who brags about  pre-ordering a Tesla and buying 3 Airs can turn around and write in a dismissive tone that his employees must be workaholics.  It would have been one thing for Warren Buffet, who public persona is that of a person who lives as “regular” a life as the world’s second richest man can, to talk about the need for people to work hard.  </p>
<p>No doubt celebrity and showmanship are  a central component of JC&#8217;s business advertising strategy, I would have never visited Mahalo except for his appearances on TWiT. But as you mentioned, there is a real danger behind JC’s (and many other Web startup impresarios’) cult of flamboyant personality around himself.  Many of these men have something to fall back on while their troops have nothing in reserve.  The ground floor startup workaholic does not have millions saved in the bank, when s/he burns themselves out, they have nothing to fall back on. The cult leaders are rich enough that they can burn themselves out – cause they can follow it up with a vacation to Tahiti.  If I burned myself out, I’d still have to get up tomorrow and look for a new job.</p>
<p>But then again, America and its uneasy relationship with celebrity (and the consequences of this liaison) is a whole &#8216;nother can of worms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11603</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11603</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Joypog:&lt;/strong&gt; And thank &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; for such a thoughtful comment! At one level I do agree: if people want to kill themselves, so be it. As I jokingly said when a friend turned down a social invitation because he was volunteering as a beach lifesaver, &quot;Nah, mate, come to the pub and let the stupid bastards drown.&quot;

Society &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; need risk-takers: look to any nation&#039;s armed forces and emergency services for outstanding examples of bravery. However in those cases the end result is primarily for the society&#039;s good, not for personal gain.

The other problem with is that if people burn out, the rest of us have to pick up the pieces -- either personally as family, friends and neighbours, or societally through the burden of increased healthcare costs.

Nice point about the celebrity architects -- and of course we see the over-rated &quot;stars&quot; in any field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Joypog:</strong> And thank <em>you</em> for such a thoughtful comment! At one level I do agree: if people want to kill themselves, so be it. As I jokingly said when a friend turned down a social invitation because he was volunteering as a beach lifesaver, &#8220;Nah, mate, come to the pub and let the stupid bastards drown.&#8221;</p>
<p>Society <em>does</em> need risk-takers: look to any nation&#8217;s armed forces and emergency services for outstanding examples of bravery. However in those cases the end result is primarily for the society&#8217;s good, not for personal gain.</p>
<p>The other problem with is that if people burn out, the rest of us have to pick up the pieces &#8212; either personally as family, friends and neighbours, or societally through the burden of increased healthcare costs.</p>
<p>Nice point about the celebrity architects &#8212; and of course we see the over-rated &#8220;stars&#8221; in any field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: கில்லி - Gilli &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to start and run a startup</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11602</link>
		<dc:creator>கில்லி - Gilli &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How to start and run a startup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11602</guid>
		<description>[...] அப்படியெல்லாம் hard and fast rule போட்டுவிடவும் முடியாது. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] அப்படியெல்லாம் hard and fast rule போட்டுவிடவும் முடியாது. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joypog</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11594</link>
		<dc:creator>Joypog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11594</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to thank you for your very interesting post.  My laissez-faire attitude is that if people are willing to kill themselves for the chance at big $$ it&#039;s their own problem.  If they want to sign on with someone like Calacanis, its fine with me -- with the only caveat that he should be frank about the risk (and effort) / reward as he sees it.  If JC is dishonest about the prospects or rewards for success then all bets are off, then he&#039;d just be a fraud, but if he is honest, then it&#039;s his employees are suxors.

I&#039;m an architect and I see this sort of issue all the time.  The superstar architects are able to get interns to work insane hours for insanely low pay (like 12 hour days for $400/week).  I&#039;m not one of those, no-one can pay me that little for that much work for the privilege of putting their name on my resume.

That said, I think that there is a major cultural problem that you do address, which is best summed up in your penultimate line, and we really do need to knock down the high stature of the &quot;high-risk/high-reward/high burnout&quot; approach to life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to thank you for your very interesting post.  My laissez-faire attitude is that if people are willing to kill themselves for the chance at big $$ it&#8217;s their own problem.  If they want to sign on with someone like Calacanis, its fine with me &#8212; with the only caveat that he should be frank about the risk (and effort) / reward as he sees it.  If JC is dishonest about the prospects or rewards for success then all bets are off, then he&#8217;d just be a fraud, but if he is honest, then it&#8217;s his employees are suxors.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an architect and I see this sort of issue all the time.  The superstar architects are able to get interns to work insane hours for insanely low pay (like 12 hour days for $400/week).  I&#8217;m not one of those, no-one can pay me that little for that much work for the privilege of putting their name on my resume.</p>
<p>That said, I think that there is a major cultural problem that you do address, which is best summed up in your penultimate line, and we really do need to knock down the high stature of the &#8220;high-risk/high-reward/high burnout&#8221; approach to life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11569</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11569</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Crispin Harris:&lt;/strong&gt; It initially became controversial because the 680 &lt;em&gt;thousand&lt;/em&gt; readers of &lt;em&gt;TechCrunch&lt;/em&gt;, many of whom would be the monomaniacal workaholics Calacanis adores, had their personal views challenged. Duncan Riley linked to my original piece and that -- plus the &lt;em&gt;Techmeme&lt;/em&gt; mention -- pulled in some 7000-odd new readers here.

However most of those readers would have commented back on whichever higher-traffic site they first came from, because there&#039;s where the discussion was. And it soon became obvious that there were two diametrically-opposed viewpoints. Everybody said their piece a few times, then stalemate.

And after that, 36 hours later or whatever, it was the storm in a teacup over &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/&quot;&gt;Mark Zuckerberg&#039;s supposedly &quot;disastrous&quot; interview&lt;/a&gt; at SXSW. The feral goldfish had moved on. This piece has only scored 500-odd readers so far (plus RSS traffic).

It&#039;s also a few too many words for the poor little petals.

&lt;strong&gt;@Joel Brians:&lt;/strong&gt; What we&#039;re actually talking about here is the different approaches to treating employees -- as disposable meat-assets or as, well, people. Still...

All you&#039;re really saying is that 37signals&#039; products don&#039;t do everything for everybody. They&#039;d be the first to agree. In the same way if I buy a Ferrari, it&#039;s fine for driving around the city but &quot;sooner or later&quot; I&#039;ll want to drive off-road and then it&#039;s no good.

&lt;strong&gt;Given that you don&#039;t actually address any of the issues we&#039;ve discussed, and the wording of your comment sounds like a canned PR testimonial, can I assume you&#039;re just some dishonest lackey whoring Wrike? If so, have the balls to say so -- you&#039;ll earn more respect that way.&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Crispin Harris:</strong> It initially became controversial because the 680 <em>thousand</em> readers of <em>TechCrunch</em>, many of whom would be the monomaniacal workaholics Calacanis adores, had their personal views challenged. Duncan Riley linked to my original piece and that &#8212; plus the <em>Techmeme</em> mention &#8212; pulled in some 7000-odd new readers here.</p>
<p>However most of those readers would have commented back on whichever higher-traffic site they first came from, because there&#8217;s where the discussion was. And it soon became obvious that there were two diametrically-opposed viewpoints. Everybody said their piece a few times, then stalemate.</p>
<p>And after that, 36 hours later or whatever, it was the storm in a teacup over <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/10/the-nuclear-disaster-at-sxsw-was-nothing-more-than-a-witch-burning/">Mark Zuckerberg&#8217;s supposedly &#8220;disastrous&#8221; interview</a> at SXSW. The feral goldfish had moved on. This piece has only scored 500-odd readers so far (plus RSS traffic).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a few too many words for the poor little petals.</p>
<p><strong>@Joel Brians:</strong> What we&#8217;re actually talking about here is the different approaches to treating employees &#8212; as disposable meat-assets or as, well, people. Still&#8230;</p>
<p>All you&#8217;re really saying is that 37signals&#8217; products don&#8217;t do everything for everybody. They&#8217;d be the first to agree. In the same way if I buy a Ferrari, it&#8217;s fine for driving around the city but &#8220;sooner or later&#8221; I&#8217;ll want to drive off-road and then it&#8217;s no good.</p>
<p><strong>Given that you don&#8217;t actually address any of the issues we&#8217;ve discussed, and the wording of your comment sounds like a canned PR testimonial, can I assume you&#8217;re just some dishonest lackey whoring Wrike? If so, have the balls to say so &#8212; you&#8217;ll earn more respect that way.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Brians</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11561</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Brians</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11561</guid>
		<description>Basecamp creators are known for their views on project management. It might suit some teams, but not all of them. The tool is great, but sooner of later you start to miss some features that might have been really useful. This happened to me too and I had to look for another solution. Now I&#039;m with Wrike. The tools is being developed very quickly and features like timeline with drag and drop function really do make my life a lot easier.

[&lt;strong&gt;Stil says:&lt;/strong&gt; I&#039;ve edited this post to remove the hyperlink until I get confirmation back from the poster that he&#039;s not a PR person for Wrike.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basecamp creators are known for their views on project management. It might suit some teams, but not all of them. The tool is great, but sooner of later you start to miss some features that might have been really useful. This happened to me too and I had to look for another solution. Now I&#8217;m with Wrike. The tools is being developed very quickly and features like timeline with drag and drop function really do make my life a lot easier.</p>
<p>[<strong>Stil says:</strong> I've edited this post to remove the hyperlink until I get confirmation back from the poster that he's not a PR person for Wrike.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crispin Harris</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11553</link>
		<dc:creator>Crispin Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/john_calacanis_evil_cult/#comment-11553</guid>
		<description>I really thought that there was going to be more controversy about this Stil.

Maybe all your readers agree with you? 
Are we all &#039;Yes &lt;strike&gt;men&lt;/strike&gt;People&#039;?

&lt;Sigh&gt; I was looking forward to a noisy debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really thought that there was going to be more controversy about this Stil.</p>
<p>Maybe all your readers agree with you?<br />
Are we all &#8216;Yes <strike>men</strike>People&#8217;?</p>
<p>&lt;Sigh&gt; I was looking forward to a noisy debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
