<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pinky goes to Hillsong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/religion/pinky_goes_to_hillsong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/pinky_goes_to_hillsong/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:41:05 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Quatrefoil</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/religion/pinky_goes_to_hillsong/#comment-8670</link>
		<dc:creator>Quatrefoil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/religion/pinky_goes_to_hillsong/#comment-8670</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d add fundamentalist atheists to my list of problems, but as for milk in first - there is a reason, but only if you&#039;re drinking from fine bone china.  If you put the hot tea in first you&#039;re likely to crackle the glaze.  I have the cup to prove it.

On the subject of your clients, I think you have to take responsibility for your own decisions and allow your clients to take responsibility for theirs.  OTOH, you&#039;re also free to use your work as a protest.  But you don&#039;t in fact know that he/she uses the profits to support Hillsong - perhaps you could ask?  Perhaps it&#039;s a rumour, or perhaps they are not a good supporter of their church?  But I think that individuals have the right to make a profit from their businesses and to spend that money as they see fit even if it&#039;s not your choice.  Perhaps the way to deal with it is to donate an amount of money equivalent to the amount you estimate would be 10% of the proportion of the profits you&#039;re responsible for to an organisation with opposing views, and let your client know that you&#039;re doing that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d add fundamentalist atheists to my list of problems, but as for milk in first &#8211; there is a reason, but only if you&#8217;re drinking from fine bone china.  If you put the hot tea in first you&#8217;re likely to crackle the glaze.  I have the cup to prove it.</p>
<p>On the subject of your clients, I think you have to take responsibility for your own decisions and allow your clients to take responsibility for theirs.  OTOH, you&#8217;re also free to use your work as a protest.  But you don&#8217;t in fact know that he/she uses the profits to support Hillsong &#8211; perhaps you could ask?  Perhaps it&#8217;s a rumour, or perhaps they are not a good supporter of their church?  But I think that individuals have the right to make a profit from their businesses and to spend that money as they see fit even if it&#8217;s not your choice.  Perhaps the way to deal with it is to donate an amount of money equivalent to the amount you estimate would be 10% of the proportion of the profits you&#8217;re responsible for to an organisation with opposing views, and let your client know that you&#8217;re doing that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
