<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 46 is online, Kevin Rudd!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/episode-46-is-online-kevin-rudd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/episode-46-is-online-kevin-rudd/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 21:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/episode-46-is-online-kevin-rudd/#comment-19950</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 00:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=4222#comment-19950</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Toejam:&lt;/strong&gt; What I find interesting about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/01/26/2474310.htm&quot;&gt;that ABC story&lt;/a&gt; is that while Mick Dodson simply called for a debate, both Rudd and Turnbull essentially &lt;em&gt;asserted without evidence&lt;/em&gt; that there was no need. Once more it makes a mockery of Rudd&#039;s claim to be all about &quot;evidence-based policy&quot;.

I can understand that he might feel -- rightly or wrongly -- that there&#039;s more important issues to focus on just now. The government and media only has so much attention span. But I think it&#039;s about time that politicians of al flavours started to understand that we &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; decide what the agenda is.

Then again, Dodson could just get the debate going anyway, and the Prime Minister can join in or not, as he wishes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Toejam:</strong> What I find interesting about <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/01/26/2474310.htm">that ABC story</a> is that while Mick Dodson simply called for a debate, both Rudd and Turnbull essentially <em>asserted without evidence</em> that there was no need. Once more it makes a mockery of Rudd&#8217;s claim to be all about &#8220;evidence-based policy&#8221;.</p>
<p>I can understand that he might feel &#8212; rightly or wrongly &#8212; that there&#8217;s more important issues to focus on just now. The government and media only has so much attention span. But I think it&#8217;s about time that politicians of al flavours started to understand that we <em>all</em> decide what the agenda is.</p>
<p>Then again, Dodson could just get the debate going anyway, and the Prime Minister can join in or not, as he wishes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian &#183; Episode 47 is online, marketers and twitterers</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/episode-46-is-online-kevin-rudd/#comment-19864</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian &#183; Episode 47 is online, marketers and twitterers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 23:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=4222#comment-19864</guid>
		<description>[...] thought Prime Minister Kevin Rudd would score more votes for the federal budget, but no. After winning last week, he only came in 4th (20%). ABC TV came in 3rd (24%) for choosing not broadcast the controversial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] thought Prime Minister Kevin Rudd would score more votes for the federal budget, but no. After winning last week, he only came in 4th (20%). ABC TV came in 3rd (24%) for choosing not broadcast the controversial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toejam</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/episode-46-is-online-kevin-rudd/#comment-19641</link>
		<dc:creator>Toejam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 04:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=4222#comment-19641</guid>
		<description>As Mark Newton is wont to point out, the ALP also made an election commitment to change the date of Australia Day. And then, http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/01/26/2474310.htm

Whether this should be considered a &quot;major election promise&quot; is obviously open for debate, but still...

Maybe he should adopt Howard&#039;s &quot;Core/Non-Core&quot; system :-Þ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Mark Newton is wont to point out, the ALP also made an election commitment to change the date of Australia Day. And then, <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/01/26/2474310.htm" >http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/01/26/2474310.htm</a></p>
<p>Whether this should be considered a &#8220;major election promise&#8221; is obviously open for debate, but still&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe he should adopt Howard&#8217;s &#8220;Core/Non-Core&#8221; system :-Þ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

