<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here&#8217;s episode 4!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 21:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/#comment-13033</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 22:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1651#comment-13033</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Deanlk:&lt;/strong&gt; But isn&#039;t &quot;getting up close and personal&quot; the &lt;em&gt;point&lt;/em&gt; of more personal broadcasting? ;)

&lt;strong&gt;@neerav:&lt;/strong&gt; I don&#039;t know what the live stream looks like from the users&#039; end as that&#039;s controlled by Ustream. However the downloaded Quicktime movie after the event was 71.8MB for 31 min 09 sec, or 39kbit/sec, at 320 x 240 pixels. That&#039;s broadly similar to the compression levels on ABC TV&#039;s vodcasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Deanlk:</strong> But isn&#8217;t &#8220;getting up close and personal&#8221; the <em>point</em> of more personal broadcasting? <img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>@neerav:</strong> I don&#8217;t know what the live stream looks like from the users&#8217; end as that&#8217;s controlled by Ustream. However the downloaded Quicktime movie after the event was 71.8MB for 31 min 09 sec, or 39kbit/sec, at 320 x 240 pixels. That&#8217;s broadly similar to the compression levels on ABC TV&#8217;s vodcasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neerav</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/#comment-12992</link>
		<dc:creator>neerav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 10:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1651#comment-12992</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t get to watch as I&#039;m speed capped until June 1 :-(

Curious to know how many kbytes/sec the stream was broadcast at as that determines how much of my 10GB quota would get used up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t get to watch as I&#8217;m speed capped until June 1 <img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Curious to know how many kbytes/sec the stream was broadcast at as that determines how much of my 10GB quota would get used up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deanlk</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/#comment-12990</link>
		<dc:creator>Deanlk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 05:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1651#comment-12990</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pro camera 2.  Camera 2 is not a bad thing.  Getting too up close &amp; personal with camera 2 is a bad thing, but camera 2 in and of itself is not a bad thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pro camera 2.  Camera 2 is not a bad thing.  Getting too up close &amp; personal with camera 2 is a bad thing, but camera 2 in and of itself is not a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/#comment-12988</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 04:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1651#comment-12988</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Stephen Stockwell:&lt;/strong&gt; Glad you enjoyed it. If I&#039;d had anything prepared to say about the music I&#039;d have said it, but when it came to the crunch my brain was suddenly empty. Plus I realised I was out of time anyway. Yes, wordage would have been good. Next week we&#039;ll have more time, now that technical ssues have been solved.

&lt;strong&gt;@NathanaelB:&lt;/strong&gt; Camera 2 goes back to its rightful owner soon. You will be safe... for the time being.

&lt;strong&gt;@jason:&lt;/strong&gt; It failed for me also this morning. I think it&#039;s something about Ustream during peak traffic times in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Stephen Stockwell:</strong> Glad you enjoyed it. If I&#8217;d had anything prepared to say about the music I&#8217;d have said it, but when it came to the crunch my brain was suddenly empty. Plus I realised I was out of time anyway. Yes, wordage would have been good. Next week we&#8217;ll have more time, now that technical ssues have been solved.</p>
<p><strong>@NathanaelB:</strong> Camera 2 goes back to its rightful owner soon. You will be safe&#8230; for the time being.</p>
<p><strong>@jason:</strong> It failed for me also this morning. I think it&#8217;s something about Ustream during peak traffic times in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/#comment-12987</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 01:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1651#comment-12987</guid>
		<description>The video wont load for me :(  Tried FF and IE

Will try again laters</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The video wont load for me <img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   Tried FF and IE</p>
<p>Will try again laters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NathanaelB</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/#comment-12986</link>
		<dc:creator>NathanaelB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1651#comment-12986</guid>
		<description>Please, for the love of all that is beautiful in this world DO NOT USE CAMERA #2 AGAIN! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, for the love of all that is beautiful in this world DO NOT USE CAMERA #2 AGAIN! <img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/#comment-12985</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1651#comment-12985</guid>
		<description>Hey, good work sunshine!

That actually went pretty well even if you don&#039;t compare it to the bedlam of episodes I &amp; III (&lt;i&gt;Episode II: The Lost Sessions&lt;/i&gt; being, well...lost. The rest of us will never know). The shiny new computer&#039;s obviously made a huge improvement, both technically and to your state of mind. Helps not to be under the weather as well. But it looks like you&#039;re having fun with your two camera angles -- great for asides, footnotes, change of tone, etcetera. Nice brazen plug for our favourite brewer.

One thing though: I sat up in my chair when you said you were going to &lt;i&gt;talk&lt;/i&gt; about eighties pop, but then you just closed off with the clip. I reckon it could be a good idea for next time if there&#039;s room left at the end of the show for some sort of discussion/analysis/deconstruction (or just good old mouthing off) about selected exhibits of former pop trash glory in all its forms. That&#039;s what your True Fans will be taking to the water cooler the next day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, good work sunshine!</p>
<p>That actually went pretty well even if you don&#8217;t compare it to the bedlam of episodes I &amp; III (<i>Episode II: The Lost Sessions</i> being, well&#8230;lost. The rest of us will never know). The shiny new computer&#8217;s obviously made a huge improvement, both technically and to your state of mind. Helps not to be under the weather as well. But it looks like you&#8217;re having fun with your two camera angles &#8212; great for asides, footnotes, change of tone, etcetera. Nice brazen plug for our favourite brewer.</p>
<p>One thing though: I sat up in my chair when you said you were going to <i>talk</i> about eighties pop, but then you just closed off with the clip. I reckon it could be a good idea for next time if there&#8217;s room left at the end of the show for some sort of discussion/analysis/deconstruction (or just good old mouthing off) about selected exhibits of former pop trash glory in all its forms. That&#8217;s what your True Fans will be taking to the water cooler the next day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

