<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here&#8217;s episode 4!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/#comment-13033</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 22:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1651#comment-13033</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Deanlk:&lt;/strong&gt; But isn't "getting up close and personal" the &lt;em&gt;point&lt;/em&gt; of more personal broadcasting? ;)

&lt;strong&gt;@neerav:&lt;/strong&gt; I don't know what the live stream looks like from the users' end as that's controlled by Ustream. However the downloaded Quicktime movie after the event was 71.8MB for 31 min 09 sec, or 39kbit/sec, at 320 x 240 pixels. That's broadly similar to the compression levels on ABC TV's vodcasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Deanlk:</strong> But isn&#8217;t &#8220;getting up close and personal&#8221; the <em>point</em> of more personal broadcasting? <img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><strong>@neerav:</strong> I don&#8217;t know what the live stream looks like from the users&#8217; end as that&#8217;s controlled by Ustream. However the downloaded Quicktime movie after the event was 71.8MB for 31 min 09 sec, or 39kbit/sec, at 320 x 240 pixels. That&#8217;s broadly similar to the compression levels on ABC TV&#8217;s vodcasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neerav</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/#comment-12992</link>
		<dc:creator>neerav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 10:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1651#comment-12992</guid>
		<description>Didn't get to watch as I'm speed capped until June 1 :-(

Curious to know how many kbytes/sec the stream was broadcast at as that determines how much of my 10GB quota would get used up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t get to watch as I&#8217;m speed capped until June 1 <img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Curious to know how many kbytes/sec the stream was broadcast at as that determines how much of my 10GB quota would get used up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deanlk</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/#comment-12990</link>
		<dc:creator>Deanlk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 05:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1651#comment-12990</guid>
		<description>I'm pro camera 2.  Camera 2 is not a bad thing.  Getting too up close &#38; personal with camera 2 is a bad thing, but camera 2 in and of itself is not a bad thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pro camera 2.  Camera 2 is not a bad thing.  Getting too up close &amp; personal with camera 2 is a bad thing, but camera 2 in and of itself is not a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/#comment-12988</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 04:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1651#comment-12988</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@Stephen Stockwell:&lt;/strong&gt; Glad you enjoyed it. If I'd had anything prepared to say about the music I'd have said it, but when it came to the crunch my brain was suddenly empty. Plus I realised I was out of time anyway. Yes, wordage would have been good. Next week we'll have more time, now that technical ssues have been solved.

&lt;strong&gt;@NathanaelB:&lt;/strong&gt; Camera 2 goes back to its rightful owner soon. You will be safe... for the time being.

&lt;strong&gt;@jason:&lt;/strong&gt; It failed for me also this morning. I think it's something about Ustream during peak traffic times in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Stephen Stockwell:</strong> Glad you enjoyed it. If I&#8217;d had anything prepared to say about the music I&#8217;d have said it, but when it came to the crunch my brain was suddenly empty. Plus I realised I was out of time anyway. Yes, wordage would have been good. Next week we&#8217;ll have more time, now that technical ssues have been solved.</p>
<p><strong>@NathanaelB:</strong> Camera 2 goes back to its rightful owner soon. You will be safe&#8230; for the time being.</p>
<p><strong>@jason:</strong> It failed for me also this morning. I think it&#8217;s something about Ustream during peak traffic times in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/#comment-12987</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 01:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1651#comment-12987</guid>
		<description>The video wont load for me :(  Tried FF and IE

Will try again laters</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The video wont load for me <img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  Tried FF and IE</p>
<p>Will try again laters</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NathanaelB</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/#comment-12986</link>
		<dc:creator>NathanaelB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1651#comment-12986</guid>
		<description>Please, for the love of all that is beautiful in this world DO NOT USE CAMERA #2 AGAIN! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, for the love of all that is beautiful in this world DO NOT USE CAMERA #2 AGAIN! <img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Stockwell</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/stilgherrian-live/heres-episode-4/#comment-12985</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Stockwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1651#comment-12985</guid>
		<description>Hey, good work sunshine!

That actually went pretty well even if you don't compare it to the bedlam of episodes I &#38; III (&lt;i&gt;Episode II: The Lost Sessions&lt;/i&gt; being, well...lost. The rest of us will never know). The shiny new computer's obviously made a huge improvement, both technically and to your state of mind. Helps not to be under the weather as well. But it looks like you're having fun with your two camera angles -- great for asides, footnotes, change of tone, etcetera. Nice brazen plug for our favourite brewer.

One thing though: I sat up in my chair when you said you were going to &lt;i&gt;talk&lt;/i&gt; about eighties pop, but then you just closed off with the clip. I reckon it could be a good idea for next time if there's room left at the end of the show for some sort of discussion/analysis/deconstruction (or just good old mouthing off) about selected exhibits of former pop trash glory in all its forms. That's what your True Fans will be taking to the water cooler the next day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, good work sunshine!</p>
<p>That actually went pretty well even if you don&#8217;t compare it to the bedlam of episodes I &amp; III (<i>Episode II: The Lost Sessions</i> being, well&#8230;lost. The rest of us will never know). The shiny new computer&#8217;s obviously made a huge improvement, both technically and to your state of mind. Helps not to be under the weather as well. But it looks like you&#8217;re having fun with your two camera angles &#8212; great for asides, footnotes, change of tone, etcetera. Nice brazen plug for our favourite brewer.</p>
<p>One thing though: I sat up in my chair when you said you were going to <i>talk</i> about eighties pop, but then you just closed off with the clip. I reckon it could be a good idea for next time if there&#8217;s room left at the end of the show for some sort of discussion/analysis/deconstruction (or just good old mouthing off) about selected exhibits of former pop trash glory in all its forms. That&#8217;s what your True Fans will be taking to the water cooler the next day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
