<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Stilgherrian &#187; google trends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/tag/google-trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 05:57:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/4.0" -->
	<itunes:summary>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive les poissons rouges sauvages!</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Stilgherrian</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/sla_144w.jpg" />
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Stilgherrian</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>stil@stilgherrian.com</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<managingEditor>stil@stilgherrian.com (Stilgherrian)</managingEditor>
	<copyright>2006-2007</copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle>A master feed of all Stilgherrian&#039;s audio and video podcasts.</itunes:subtitle>
	
	<itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics" />
	<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture" />
	<itunes:category text="Comedy" />
		<item>
		<title>Has Google Trends data made me look a goose?</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/has-google-trends-data-made-me-look-a-goose/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/has-google-trends-data-made-me-look-a-goose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crikey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neilsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ninemsn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=5827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I wrote an article for Crikey plus a post here based on Google Trends data which, it now appears, is dodgy. Google Trends shows a steady decline in traffic to various websites since about September 2008, based on the metric &#8220;unique daily browsers&#8221;. But I was howled down. Everyone else&#8217;s metrics were not showing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yesterday I wrote <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/26/is-social-media-killing-the-web-as-we-know-it/">an article for <em>Crikey</em></a> plus a post <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/is-social-media-killing-the-web/">here</a> based on Google Trends data which, it now appears, is dodgy.</strong></p>
<p>Google Trends shows a steady decline in traffic to various websites since about September 2008, based on the metric &#8220;unique daily browsers&#8221;. But I was howled down. Everyone else&#8217;s metrics were <em>not</em> showing such a decline.</p>
<p>Indeed many, such as this chart of Nielsen NetRatings&#8217; unique dailies, provided by Andrew Hunter (<a href="http://twitter.com/Huntzie">@Huntzie</a>), Head of News, Sport and Finance at <a href="http://ninemsn.com.au">ninemsn</a>, showed the exact opposite.</p>
<p><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/crikey-webtraffic-20091127-001.jpg"><img src="http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/crikey-webtraffic-20091127-001-600w.jpg" alt="Nielsen NetRatings unique daily browser chart, showing steady rise in audiences: click to embiggen" title="Nielsen NetRatings unique daily browser chart, showing steady rise in audiences: click to embiggen" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5830" /></a></p>
<p>For example, <a href="http://www.news.com.au">news.com.au</a> grew from 250,829 average daily unique browsers (UBs) in July 2008 to 346,367 in October 2009, a 38% increase. Not the roughly 50% drop shown by Google Trends.</p>
<p>Google <a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/trends/websites/help/index.html">says</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Trends for Websites combines information from a variety of sources, such as aggregated Google search data, aggregated opt-in anonymous Google Analytics data, opt-in consumer panel data, and other third-party market research. The data is aggregated over millions of users, powered by computer algorithms…</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>In other words, it’s some Google Secret Sauce. But has the sauce gone off?</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/angry_goose_75w.jpg" alt="Photograph of an angry goose" title="Photograph of an angry goose" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-5833" /></p>
<p>The Google Trends forum is rather quiet. There were only three questions or comments posted for the whole of September, none of which received a reply, and nothing since. I can’t see that anyone from Google has responded to anything for months and months — I gave up looking back any further. Others have noted that Google Trends data differs wildly from Google’s own Analytics product — usually complaining that it shows significantly less traffic.</p>
<p>Google Trends is a Google Labs product, i.e. an experiment, I’m starting to think that it’s been abandoned and we’re just seeing a slow degradation due to lack of maintenance.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I have changed my Twitter avatar to a goose for the rest of today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/has-google-trends-data-made-me-look-a-goose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is social media killing the web (as we&#8217;ve known it)?</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/is-social-media-killing-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/is-social-media-killing-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crikey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=5816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Google Trends&#8217; statistics are to be trusted, it looks like there&#8217;s been a significant decline in traffic to websites over the last year &#8212; not just news, but everywhere. Except social network sites. Following a blog post by Nicholas Moerman, a planning intern with Proximity in London, I checked out the figures for Australia [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/26/is-social-media-killing-the-web-as-we-know-it/"><img src="http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/crikey-webtraffic-20091126-001.jpg" alt="Google Trends graph showing traffic drop to major Australian news sites" title="Google Trends graph showing traffic drop to major Australian news sites" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5815" /></a></p>
<p><strong>If Google Trends&#8217; statistics are to be trusted, it looks like there&#8217;s been a significant decline in traffic to websites over the last year &#8212; not just news, but everywhere. Except social network sites.</strong></p>
<p>Following <a href="http://nicolasmoerman.com/is-the-internet-dying">a blog post by Nicholas Moerman</a>, a planning intern with Proximity in London, I checked out the figures for Australia sites. It does indeed look like there&#8217;s been a significant drop in daily unique visitors &#8212; which is what Google Trends measures, rather than the more common monthly uniques.</p>
<p><img src="http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/crikey_logo_75w.jpg" alt="Crikey logo" class="imageright" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written more, and provided more graphs, in a piece for <em>Crikey</em> today, <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/26/is-social-media-killing-the-web-as-we-know-it/">Is social media killing the web as we know it?</a></p>
<p>Oh, and I was also in <em>Crikey</em> yesterday, <a href="http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/11/25/baffled-by-murdersoft-making-sense-of-murdoch-and-microsoft/">Baffled by Murdersoft? Making sense of Murdoch and Microsoft</a>, where I look at some of the numbers behind the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a243c8b2-d79b-11de-b578-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1">rumoured deal</a> between News Corporation and Microsoft&#8217;s Bing search engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/is-social-media-killing-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

