<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Stilgherrian &#187; heath ledger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilgherrian.com/tag/heath-ledger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilgherrian.com</link>
	<description>All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris. Vive le poisson rouge sauvages!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
		<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9; </copyright>
		<managingEditor>stil@stilgherrian.com ()</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>stil@stilgherrian.com()</webMaster>
		<category></category>
		<ttl>1440</ttl>
		<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Live Internet broadcasts from Stilgherrian. All publication is a political act. All communication is propaganda. All art is pornography. All business is personal. All hail Eris.</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author></itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name></itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>stil@stilgherrian.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>So, did we attract more porn searches?</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-did-we-attract-more-porn-searches/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-did-we-attract-more-porn-searches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 22:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Human Nature]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[corey delaney]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[corey worthington]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pornography]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/?p=1817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did publishing a list of porn site search terms change the pattern of traffic to this website? Not much.
The most common search terms apart  from my own name are still &#8220;heath ledger jokes&#8221;, &#8220;steve irwin jokes&#8221;, &#8220;used knickers&#8221; and &#8220;corey delaney&#8221;. The only ones I could see &#8220;young pussy&#8221;, &#8220;asian pussy&#8221;, &#8220;strip pork gams [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Did publishing a list of <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-this-is-human-sexuality/">porn site search terms</a> change the pattern of traffic to this website? Not much.</strong></p>
<p>The most common search terms apart  from my own name are still &#8220;heath ledger jokes&#8221;, &#8220;steve irwin jokes&#8221;, &#8220;used knickers&#8221; and &#8220;corey delaney&#8221;. The only ones I could see &#8220;young pussy&#8221;, &#8220;asian pussy&#8221;, &#8220;strip pork gams porn&#8221;, &#8220;sex fuck cartoon milf jimmy neutron&#8221;, &#8220;latina asian hardcore free no charge gratis porn sex amateur&#8221; and, my favourite, &#8220;deep throat black hung transsexuals no membership free access&#8221;.</p>
<p>[<strong>Update:</strong> Actually, there <em>is</em> an increase in traffic. It's not showing up in the search analysis, but that page of search terms is getting 200 visitors a day.]</p>

	<h4>5 Random Semi-Related Posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/found-art/as_if_filmed/" title="&#8230; as if you were being filmed (22 March 2008)">&#8230; as if you were being filmed</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/ride_sex_train_gerbil/" title="Ride the Sex Train Gerbil! (29 October 2007)">Ride the Sex Train Gerbil!</a> (5 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/notes/heath_ledger_typo/" title="What sort of weird psychology is this? (24 January 2008)">What sort of weird psychology is this?</a> (2 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/twitterings/another-week-according-to-twitter/" title="Another week according to Twitter (29 June 2008)">Another week according to Twitter</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/lessons_from_heath_ledger_final/" title="Lessons from tacky Heath Ledger jokes, final edition (19 February 2008)">Lessons from tacky Heath Ledger jokes, final edition</a> (4 comments)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-did-we-attract-more-porn-searches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Odd obituary for Heath Ledger</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/notes/odd_heath_ledger_obituary/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/notes/odd_heath_ledger_obituary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[chaucer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[middle english]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/notes/odd_heath_ledger_obituary/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who&#8217;d have thought? An obituary for Heath Ledger in Middle English! Well, for a character he played. Doffing the hat to Quatrefoil, who writes, &#8220;Whoever writes this blog is frequently side-splittingly funny, but he or she can write (and knows their Middle English passing well).  I am filled with wonder and envy.&#8221;

	5 Random Semi-Related [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Who&#8217;d have thought? An <a href="http://houseoffame.blogspot.com/2008/02/lament-for-sir-william.html">obituary for Heath Ledger in Middle English</a>! Well, for a character he played.</strong> Doffing the hat to <a href="http://quatrefoil.livejournal.com/78049.html">Quatrefoil</a>, who writes, &#8220;Whoever writes this blog is frequently side-splittingly funny, but he or she can <em>write</em> (and knows their Middle English passing well).  I am filled with wonder and envy.&#8221;</p>

	<h4>5 Random Semi-Related Posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_4/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 4 (27 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 4</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/notes/heath_ledger_typo/" title="What sort of weird psychology is this? (24 January 2008)">What sort of weird psychology is this?</a> (2 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_9/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 9 (01 February 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 9</a> (2 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-did-we-attract-more-porn-searches/" title="So, did we attract more porn searches? (03 August 2008)">So, did we attract more porn searches?</a> (2 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_lessons_1/" title="Lessons from tacky Heath Ledger jokes, Day 1 (24 January 2008)">Lessons from tacky Heath Ledger jokes, Day 1</a> (6 comments)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/notes/odd_heath_ledger_obituary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, this wasn&#8217;t me, but close</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/wikipedia_not_me/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/wikipedia_not_me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/internet/wikipedia_not_me/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Richard, but no. This article in The Onion is not about me. Close though, eh?

	5 Random Semi-Related Posts
	
	Corey Delaney meets Life Streaming (sort of) (0 comments)
	What sort of weird psychology is this? (2 comments)
	Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 1 (5 comments)
	Lessons from tacky Heath Ledger jokes, final edition (4 comments)
	Did the PM&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Thank you, Richard, but no. <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news/area_man_honored_to_be_one_who">This article in <em>The Onion</em></a> is not about me.</strong> Close though, eh?</p>

	<h4>5 Random Semi-Related Posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/so-did-we-attract-more-porn-searches/" title="So, did we attract more porn searches? (03 August 2008)">So, did we attract more porn searches?</a> (2 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_5/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 5 (28 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 5</a> (2 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_7/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 7 (30 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 7</a> (1 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/lingiari_shame/" title="Saturday Night Trivia, Question 1 (12 August 2006)">Saturday Night Trivia, Question 1</a> (1 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_4/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 4 (27 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 4</a> (0 comments)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/wikipedia_not_me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lessons from tacky Heath Ledger jokes, final edition</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/lessons_from_heath_ledger_final/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/lessons_from_heath_ledger_final/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/internet/lessons_from_heath_ledger_final/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s nearly a month since I posted my tacky Heath Ledger joke page. What have we learned? Truth be told, not a lot more than I wrote in the Day 1 lessons and the items tagged &#8220;heath ledger&#8221;.
But let&#8217;s look at the total traffic anyway, this time using a graph from Google Analytics which shows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>It&#8217;s nearly a month since I posted my <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dead_jokes/">tacky Heath Ledger joke page</a>. What have we learned? Truth be told, not a lot more than I wrote in the <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_lessons_1/">Day 1 lessons</a> and the <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/tag/heath-ledger/">items tagged &#8220;heath ledger&#8221;</a>.</strong></p>
<p>But let&#8217;s look at the total traffic anyway, this time using a graph from <a href="http://www.google.com/analytics/">Google Analytics</a> which shows visits <em>only</em> visitors to the jokes page.</p>
<p><img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/heath_graph_20080219_600w.jpg' alt='Graph of one month of Heath Ledger-related traffic' class="imagecentre" /></p>
<p>As of just now, there&#8217;s been 11,717 page views in total, representing 8,798 unique visitors who stayed on average for 3 mins 44 secs per visit &#8212; quite respectable!</p>
<p>Traffic took a couple of days to peak &#8212; the first day being fuelled by Google Adwords &#8212; with a secondary peak the following week when Ledger&#8217;s funeral arrangements hit the news. Google rates the peaks as about 1000 visits a day and even now, a month later, we&#8217;re still seeing 60 to 80 visits a day.</p>
<p><strong>As for the jokes themselves, well&#8230; to be honest I really don&#8217;t want to read them again. Most of them were crap. If you&#8217;ve got any astounding sociological observations, feel free to post a comment.</strong></p>

	<h4>5 Random Semi-Related Posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_1/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 1 (24 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 1</a> (5 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/google_doubleclick_merge/" title="Google and DoubleClick to merge (13 January 2008)">Google and DoubleClick to merge</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/oops_there_goes_privacy/" title="Oops, there goes privacy! So now what? (21 July 2007)">Oops, there goes privacy! So now what?</a> (2 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/media/the_world_according_to_pravda/" title="The World According to Pravda, 2007 (13 May 2007)">The World According to Pravda, 2007</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/who_owns_internet/" title="Who owns what on the Internet (09 February 2008)">Who owns what on the Internet</a> (0 comments)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/lessons_from_heath_ledger_final/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Recreational outrage&#8221; is annoying</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/recreational_outrage_annoying/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/recreational_outrage_annoying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Human Nature]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[anthony callea]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[recreational outrage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/recreational_outrage_annoying/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe it was the phase of the Moon yesterday, but two different people were unhappy with discussions here and launched personal attacks. Google says I&#8217;m not the first to coin the term recreational outrage, but it&#8217;s certainly a perfect description.
If you read my every word &#8212; and I know you do, Gentle Reader &#8212; you&#8217;ll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Maybe it was the phase of the Moon yesterday, but two different people were unhappy with discussions here and launched personal attacks. Google says I&#8217;m not the first to coin the term <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=%22recreational+outrage%22">recreational outrage</a>, but it&#8217;s certainly a perfect description.</strong></p>
<p>If you read my every word &#8212; and I know <em>you</em> do, Gentle Reader &#8212; you&#8217;ll remember that <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/compulsory_911_post/">my compulsory 9/11 post</a> from 2006 mentioned &#8220;recreational grief&#8221;, a term I picked up from <a href="http://www.deathreference.com/Bl-Ce/Celebrity-Deaths.html"><em>Encyclopaedia of Death and Dying</em></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The degree of public mourning following the deaths of Lady Diana and John F Kennedy Jr led social observers to wonder if grief is an ever-present latent feeling just waiting to be exploited by the political elite, if people’s lives are so empty that they engage in recreational grief… Perhaps individuals are emotive puppets manipulated by the mass media and/or political elite, and people cry because they are shown other people crying for a celebrity.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps outrage is also an ever-present latent feeling. If people&#8217;s lives are so comfortable that there&#8217;s nothing <em>serious</em> to get angry about, they&#8217;ll find somewhere to vent their outrage &#8212; going to considerable effort to find it.</p>
<p>Yesterday&#8217;s incidents could well illustrate this.</p>
<p>Gavin decided to <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dead_jokes/#comment-10413">call me an &#8220;asshole&#8221;</a> for running the Heath Ledger jokes page.</p>
<blockquote><p>Did any of you brain dead assholes stop to think Heath’s family have access to the world wide web, and could read this shit?<br />
I hope that when you pass on, some asshole posts jokes about you!<br />
But then again, that ain’t gonna happen…….<br />
…….Because your not rich, famous or good looking, hey?</p></blockquote>
<p>To which I <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dead_jokes/#comment-10416">replied</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>You’re right. I’ve never realised it before. The Internet might be read by someone! We’d better not put anything there which could possibly upset any of the 1+ billion Internet users. When you get a moment, could you drop me a quick list of everything that has the potential to be upsetting? I’ll make sure that it’s never mentioned again.</p></blockquote>
<p>I emailed Gavin privately, asking him if he&#8217;d answer, non-abusively, the question I&#8217;d actually posed on that page: If you’re going to whinge that “It’s too soon to make jokes,” then at least suggest how long someone has to be dead before they’re not sacred any more.</p>
<p>His even more abusive answer, which I didn&#8217;t publish, contains the most delicious irony:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>I was talking about respect asshole, something which obviously you don&#8217;t have, and never will.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Respect. Asshole. That&#8217;s a keeper.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s interesting is that Gavin was searching for the name of the music a TV station played under their report of Ledger&#8217;s death. He saw Google&#8217;s link to Heath Ledger jokes &#8212; but that delivered him to <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/category/arts/">the Arts category index</a>. He had to click <em>again</em> on &#8220;Looking for the Heath Ledger death jokes? <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dead_jokes/">Try here</a>.&#8221; He presumably read some jokes to generate some outrage, and then scrolled <em>all the way past 160-odd comments</em> to the form where he could finally express his outrage.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s quite an effort.</p>
<p>And yet he didn&#8217;t bother exploring any other page on the site before doing that. He had no idea of the context in which he was calling people &#8220;brain dead assholes&#8221;. He only read <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/about_stilgherrian/">About Stilgherrian</a> <em>after</em> he&#8217;d posted his second piece of abuse.</p>
<p>Similarly, carra was searching the blogosphere for &#8220;anthony callea&#8221; and found our current poll, <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/music/poll_pop_princess/">Who&#8217;s the ultimate pop princess?</a> Not finding any information to fuel what I assume is a fan&#8217;s appetite for news &#8212; and maybe upset that I described Callea as &#8220;fading fast&#8221;, certainly an accurate description of his music sales &#8212; he or she <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/music/poll_pop_princess/#comment-10461">posted an insult</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>The only amusing thing about this is that 10 people have wasted their time visiting your pathetic blog with an F grade attempt at humour.</p></blockquote>
<p>After looking at just <em>one</em> post out of 900+ carra&#8217;s considered judgement is &#8220;pathetic&#8221;. I am, of course, shattered.</p>
<p>At least carra took the time to vote for Kylie Minogue before venting.</p>
<p><strong>So, is there &#8220;latent outrage&#8221; in all of us, waiting to express itself recreationally? Or am I way off the mark?</strong></p>

	<h4>5 Random Semi-Related Posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/anthony_callea_young_boys/" title="Anthony Callea: &#8220;Young Boys not My Weakness&#8221; (12 May 2007)">Anthony Callea: &#8220;Young Boys not My Weakness&#8221;</a> (5 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_9/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 9 (01 February 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 9</a> (2 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/notes/odd_heath_ledger_obituary/" title="Odd obituary for Heath Ledger (29 February 2008)">Odd obituary for Heath Ledger</a> (4 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_2/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 2 (25 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 2</a> (4 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/heath_ledger_was_an_actor/" title="Fiction is not reality (25 January 2008)">Fiction is not reality</a> (1 comments)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/recreational_outrage_annoying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 9</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_9/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_9/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Well unless Heath Ledger is in the news again for some reason, apart from the routine news about his funeral etc, I think the steady decline seen in the traffic over the last three days will continue.
As with the Steve Irwin jokes, though, the traffic will never fade away completely. There&#8217;ll always be some level [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/heath_ledger_traffic_20080201.gif' alt='Traffic Graph for 2008-02-01 showing traffic starting to steadily decline' class="imagecentre" /></p>
<p><strong>Well unless Heath Ledger is in the news again for some reason, apart from the routine news about his funeral etc, I think the steady decline seen in the traffic over the last three days will continue.</strong></p>
<p>As with the Steve Irwin jokes, though, the traffic will never fade away completely. There&#8217;ll always be <em>some</em> level of searching for &#8220;heath ledger jokes&#8221;, and occasional surges as he enters the news.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s today&#8217;s graph for now. More detailed analysis and reflection later.</p>

	<h4>5 Random Semi-Related Posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/who_owns_internet/" title="Who owns what on the Internet (09 February 2008)">Who owns what on the Internet</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/spamming_google_maps/" title="Spamming Google Maps &#8212; or not? (29 January 2007)">Spamming Google Maps &#8212; or not?</a> (1 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dead_jokes/" title="Heath Ledger dead: jokes here please (23 January 2008)">Heath Ledger dead: jokes here please</a> (180 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_8/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 8 (31 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 8</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_lessons_1/" title="Lessons from tacky Heath Ledger jokes, Day 1 (24 January 2008)">Lessons from tacky Heath Ledger jokes, Day 1</a> (6 comments)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 8</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_8/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Given that there&#8217;s quite a bit of fluctuation in web traffic from day to day anyway &#8212; for all manner of reasons &#8212; I&#8217;m going to say that it&#8217;s been relatively steady through the week so far.
As I mentioned yesterday, the Heath Ledger jokes page is now sustaining itself on Google search results. I think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/heath_ledger_traffic_20080131.gif' alt='Traffic Graph for 2008-01-31 showing traffic relatively steady' class="imagecentre" /></p>
<p><strong>Given that there&#8217;s quite a bit of fluctuation in web traffic from day to day anyway &#8212; for all manner of reasons &#8212; I&#8217;m going to say that it&#8217;s been relatively steady through the week so far.</strong></p>
<p>As I mentioned <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_7/">yesterday</a>, the <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dead_jokes/">Heath Ledger jokes</a> page is now sustaining itself on Google search results. I think I&#8217;ll do a more detailed end-of week analysis tomorrow. I just wanted to publish <em>something</em> about this Experiment today because I know every single reader is awaiting my every word on this important global issue.</p>

	<h4>5 Random Semi-Related Posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_lessons_1/" title="Lessons from tacky Heath Ledger jokes, Day 1 (24 January 2008)">Lessons from tacky Heath Ledger jokes, Day 1</a> (6 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/even_simpler_than_google/" title="Even simpler than Google (16 May 2007)">Even simpler than Google</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/google_earth_1844/" title="Google Earth, 1844 (20 November 2006)">Google Earth, 1844</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/engineering/finland_buses_good/" title="In Finland, they go buses good! (29 February 2008)">In Finland, they go buses good!</a> (5 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/human_googleads/" title="Human relationships in GoogleAds (08 July 2007)">Human relationships in GoogleAds</a> (0 comments)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 7</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_7/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_7/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Another day, another traffic graph for The Heath Ledger Experiment. And once more, contrary to my expectations, there&#8217;s another gentle increase in traffic.
Could this be because the Heath Ledger jokes page is now the top result when you do a Google search for &#8220;heath ledger jokes&#8221;?
Today is about other things for me, not Mr Ledger, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/heath_ledger_traffic_20080130.gif' alt='Traffic Graph for 2008-01-30 showing traffic continuing to gently rise again' class="imagecentre" /></p>
<p><strong>Another day, another traffic graph for The Heath Ledger Experiment. And once more, contrary to my expectations, there&#8217;s another gentle increase in traffic.</strong></p>
<p>Could this be because the <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dead_jokes/">Heath Ledger jokes</a> page is now the top result when you do a <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=heath+ledger+jokes">Google search for &#8220;heath ledger jokes&#8221;</a>?</p>
<p>Today is about other things for me, not Mr Ledger, so I&#8217;ll return to these thoughts tomorrow. But do feel free to add your own comments.</p>

	<h4>5 Random Semi-Related Posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/recreational_outrage_annoying/" title="&#8220;Recreational outrage&#8221; is annoying (05 February 2008)">&#8220;Recreational outrage&#8221; is annoying</a> (5 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/engineering/finland_buses_good/" title="In Finland, they go buses good! (29 February 2008)">In Finland, they go buses good!</a> (5 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/is_google_a_spammer/" title="Is Google a spammmer? (18 December 2006)">Is Google a spammmer?</a> (3 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/crikey-oh-no-google-took-a-photo-of-my-house/" title="Crikey: Oh no, Google took a photo of my house! (06 August 2008)">Crikey: Oh no, Google took a photo of my house!</a> (3 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dead_jokes/" title="Heath Ledger dead: jokes here please (23 January 2008)">Heath Ledger dead: jokes here please</a> (180 comments)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 6</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_6/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_6/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Yesterday I reported that traffic for The Heath Ledger Experiment had declined across the weekend. Today I can tell you that the decline has been reversed and we&#8217;re slightly up again. Across 6 days, we&#8217;ve seen a total of 6,407 unique human visitors to the jokes page.
I have no real explanation for this yet, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/heath_ledger_traffic_20080129.gif' alt='Traffic Graph for 2008-01-29 showing traffic decline slightly reversed yesterday' class="imagecentre" /></p>
<p><strong>Yesterday I <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_5/">reported</a> that traffic for The Heath Ledger Experiment had declined across the weekend. Today I can tell you that the decline has been reversed and we&#8217;re slightly up again. Across 6 days, we&#8217;ve seen a total of 6,407 unique human visitors to the <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dead_jokes/">jokes page</a>.</strong></p>
<p>I have no real explanation for this yet, and it may just be statistical noise. Still, my gut feeling is that we&#8217;re moving past the initial feeding-frenzy. Perhaps the early visitors are people who actively seek out a forum for this sort of thing, because that&#8217;s how they gain the attention they seek. Later, others stumble across the site once those early visitors have seeded it with content.</p>
<p>One old friend, who I hadn&#8217;t heard from in <em>years</em>, emailed me across the weekend to say:</p>
<blockquote><p>I stumbled across your site after someone sent me a Heath Ledger joke and I couldn&#8217;t think of a witty comeback, so decided to resort to a websearch and let the internet do my thinking for me. I never did find one good enough to send, but I did enjoy a productive half hour rooting around in your website.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m also starting to see inbound links from forums where people are discussing whether what I&#8217;m doing is tasteless or not, or reflecting on the way we feed on celebrity news in general. Is this perhaps the natural cycle of such things?</p>
<p><strong>What I <em>have</em> learned is that it&#8217;s very easy to generate a few thousand inbound visitors. But why you&#8217;d <em>want</em> to do that, and what you <em>do</em> with those visitors, are completely different questions.</strong></p>
<p>More soon&#8230;</p>

	<h4>5 Random Semi-Related Posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_4/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 4 (27 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 4</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/spamming_google_maps/" title="Spamming Google Maps &#8212; or not? (29 January 2007)">Spamming Google Maps &#8212; or not?</a> (1 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/notes/odd_heath_ledger_obituary/" title="Odd obituary for Heath Ledger (29 February 2008)">Odd obituary for Heath Ledger</a> (4 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/notes/heath_ledger_typo/" title="What sort of weird psychology is this? (24 January 2008)">What sort of weird psychology is this?</a> (2 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/google_doubleclick_merge/" title="Google and DoubleClick to merge (13 January 2008)">Google and DoubleClick to merge</a> (0 comments)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heath Ledger dominates Top 100 search phrases</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dominates_searches/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dominates_searches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[corey delaney]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[corey worthington]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[steve irwin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dominates_searches/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further to my last post about The Heath Ledger Experiment, it&#8217;s interesting to note that of the Top 100 search terms which brought traffic here, 27 are Heath Ledger-related. 28 if you count &#8220;drug overdose joke&#8221;.
That compares with 33 related to Corey Worthington Delaney and 2 to Steve Irwin.
In total there are 1773 different search [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Further to <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_5/">my last post</a> about The Heath Ledger Experiment, it&#8217;s interesting to note that of the Top 100 search terms which brought traffic here, 27 are Heath Ledger-related. 28 if you count &#8220;drug overdose joke&#8221;.</strong></p>
<p>That compares with 33 related to Corey Worthington Delaney and 2 to Steve Irwin.</p>
<p>In total there are 1773 different search phrases so far this month. Here&#8217;s the full Top 100. </p>
<blockquote>
<table>
<tr>
<th>search phrase</th>
<th>views</th>
<th>% of searches</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger jokes</td>
<td>2286</td>
<td>30.8 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney</td>
<td>544</td>
<td>7.3 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger dead jokes</td>
<td>335</td>
<td>4.5 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger joke</td>
<td>219</td>
<td>2.9 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger</td>
<td>175</td>
<td>2.3 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger death jokes</td>
<td>142</td>
<td>1.9 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>jokes about heath ledger</td>
<td>140</td>
<td>1.8 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>steve irwin jokes</td>
<td>98</td>
<td>1.3 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>stilgherrian</td>
<td>98</td>
<td>1.3 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey worthington delaney</td>
<td>94</td>
<td>1.2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney naked</td>
<td>79</td>
<td>1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney child porn</td>
<td>55</td>
<td>0.7 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger dead joke</td>
<td>55</td>
<td>0.7 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>www.vodaphone.com.au</td>
<td>45</td>
<td>0.6 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ledger jokes</td>
<td>34</td>
<td>0.4 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath leger jokes</td>
<td>28</td>
<td>0.3 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey worthington</td>
<td>28</td>
<td>0.3 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney myspace</td>
<td>28</td>
<td>0.3 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>personal</td>
<td>23</td>
<td>0.3 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>vodaphone.com.au</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>0.2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney pornography</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>0.2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>jokes heath ledger</td>
<td>22</td>
<td>0.2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey worthington child porn</td>
<td>21</td>
<td>0.2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger jokes death</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>0.2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>dead heath ledger jokes</td>
<td>18</td>
<td>0.2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney t-shirts</td>
<td>18</td>
<td>0.2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney child pornography</td>
<td>17</td>
<td>0.2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger jokes dead</td>
<td>16</td>
<td>0.2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>used knickers</td>
<td>16</td>
<td>0.2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>jokes about the death of heath ledger</td>
<td>16</td>
<td>0.2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney quotes</td>
<td>15</td>
<td>0.2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>business</td>
<td>15</td>
<td>0.2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger tasteless jokes</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney worthington</td>
<td>13</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>child porn</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney porn</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>tasteless heath ledger jokes</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney website</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey worthington porn</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney shirt</td>
<td>11</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey worthington child pornography</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney party</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger death joke</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>jokes about heath ledger s death</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>howard</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger joke dead</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger is dead jokes</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>steve irwin joke</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>cory delaney</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>drug overdose jokes</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger and jokes</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>false</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>jokes on heath ledger</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heather ledger</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>paul neil milne johnstone</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney jokes</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey worthington shirts</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>stilgherrian.com</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>0.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney shirts</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>enmore</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey worthington naked</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>daylight</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>supernaut</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney video</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>space</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>samanta fox</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney photo</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>leila mckinnon corey</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney cartoon</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heather ledger jokes</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>natasha</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>fruit carving</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey worthington arrested</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey t shirts</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>sam connell</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>steve</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>flickr</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>steve irwin death jokes</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey t-shirts</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>lolcat</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>bernadette mcmenamin</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>thai brothel</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger jokes tasteless</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ledger joke</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>samantha fox</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>gay navy sex</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heather ledge</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>www.vodaphone.com</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>stilgherrian.com/personal/prussia_net_vs_skank_media/ new prussia</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger overdose jokes</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>0 %</td>
</tr>
</table>
</blockquote>
<p>Some of other entries in the list are a worry&#8230;</p>

	<h4>5 Random Semi-Related Posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/madness_of_corey_delaney/" title="The Madness of Corey Worthington Delaney (16 January 2008)">The Madness of Corey Worthington Delaney</a> (11 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/wikipedia_not_me/" title="No, this wasn&#8217;t me, but close (21 February 2008)">No, this wasn&#8217;t me, but close</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_2/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 2 (25 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 2</a> (4 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/lessons_from_heath_ledger_final/" title="Lessons from tacky Heath Ledger jokes, final edition (19 February 2008)">Lessons from tacky Heath Ledger jokes, final edition</a> (4 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/google_earth_1844/" title="Google Earth, 1844 (20 November 2006)">Google Earth, 1844</a> (0 comments)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dominates_searches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 5</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_5/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/uncategorized/heath_ledger_spikes_website_5/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Traffic related to The Heath Ledger Experiment continues to decline across the long weekend, the exact opposite of my admittedly ill-informed speculation. From a peak of 1,970 unique human visitors daily, it&#8217;s dropped to 1,227.
However that&#8217;s still well above the typical figure of around 500 unique humans daily which prevailed before this Experiment and The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/heath_ledger_traffic_20080128.gif' alt='Traffic Graph for 2008-01-28 showing traffic continuing to decline' class="imagecentre" /></p>
<p><strong>Traffic related to <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dead_jokes/#comment-10123">The Heath Ledger Experiment</a> continues to decline across the long weekend, the exact opposite of my admittedly ill-informed speculation. From a peak of 1,970 unique human visitors daily, it&#8217;s dropped to 1,227.</strong></p>
<p>However that&#8217;s still well above the typical figure of around 500 unique humans daily which prevailed before this Experiment and <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/tag/corey-worthington/">The Madness of Corey Worthington Delaney</a>.</p>
<p>Searches for Ledger-related terms now dominate the search-generated traffic to the website. Here&#8217;s the current Top 10 search terms which brought visitors here.</p>
<blockquote>
<table>
<tr>
<th>search phrase</th>
<th>views</th>
<th>% of searches</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger jokes</td>
<td>2286</td>
<td>30.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney</td>
<td>544</td>
<td>7.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger dead jokes</td>
<td>335</td>
<td>4.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger joke</td>
<td>219</td>
<td>2.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger</td>
<td>175</td>
<td>2.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger death jokes</td>
<td>142</td>
<td>1.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>jokes about heath ledger</td>
<td>140</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>steve irwin jokes</td>
<td>98</td>
<td>1.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>stilgherrian</td>
<td>98</td>
<td>1.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey worthington delaney</td>
<td>94</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>other phrases</td>
<td>3289</td>
<td>44.3%</td>
</tr>
</table>
</blockquote>
<p>Bear in mind, this is a report for the entire calendar month, and we only started this experiment on 23 January. If we&#8217;re looking at current traffic, Heath Ledger is clearly what people are looking for.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll continue poking at the numbers&#8230; more soon!</p>

	<h4>5 Random Semi-Related Posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/recreational_outrage_annoying/" title="&#8220;Recreational outrage&#8221; is annoying (05 February 2008)">&#8220;Recreational outrage&#8221; is annoying</a> (5 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_6/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 6 (29 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 6</a> (3 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/media/the_world_according_to_pravda/" title="The World According to Pravda, 2007 (13 May 2007)">The World According to Pravda, 2007</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_8/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 8 (31 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 8</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/notes/odd_heath_ledger_obituary/" title="Odd obituary for Heath Ledger (29 February 2008)">Odd obituary for Heath Ledger</a> (4 comments)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 4</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_4/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 01:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Hmmm&#8230; I predicted yesterday that traffic would increase again across the weekend, but it hasn&#8217;t so far. Saturday&#8217;s traffic was actually the lowest of the four days since I started The Heath Ledger Experiment.
No theories yet. Let&#8217;s look again tomorrow and see what happens with the Sunday traffic (which will include hits from Saturday in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/heath_ledger_traffic_20080127.gif' alt='Traffic Graph for 2008-01-27 showing traffic continuing to decline' class="imagecentre" /></p>
<p><strong>Hmmm&#8230; I <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_3/">predicted yesterday</a> that traffic would increase again across the weekend, but it hasn&#8217;t so far. Saturday&#8217;s traffic was actually the lowest of the four days since I started <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dead_jokes/">The Heath Ledger Experiment</a>.</strong></p>
<p>No theories yet. Let&#8217;s look again tomorrow and see what happens with the Sunday traffic (which will include hits from Saturday in the US, thanks to the Earth being round). A sunny Sunday isn&#8217;t right for numerical analysis.</p>
<p>As before, the figure for the last day only includes traffic from midnight to about 4am. And the number in the top-left corner of the graph isn&#8217;t relevant, as it&#8217;s &#8220;hits&#8221; &#8212; which includes all the pieces on a page as well as the page itself.</p>

	<h4>5 Random Semi-Related Posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/daily_links/daily_links_20080812/" title="Links for 11 August 2008 through 12 August 2008 (13 August 2008)">Links for 11 August 2008 through 12 August 2008</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_6/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 6 (29 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 6</a> (3 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dominates_searches/" title="Heath Ledger dominates Top 100 search phrases (28 January 2008)">Heath Ledger dominates Top 100 search phrases</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/crikey-oh-no-google-took-a-photo-of-my-house/" title="Crikey: Oh no, Google took a photo of my house! (06 August 2008)">Crikey: Oh no, Google took a photo of my house!</a> (3 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_9/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 9 (01 February 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 9</a> (2 comments)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 3</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_3/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_3/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Website traffic is starting to decline again although, as the graph shows, yesterday&#8217;s traffic was still the second-highest this month and the decline was relatively small.

Two things this morning. One, a look back at how much time this has taken so far, in response to a less-than-polite comment from Todd and a sensible question from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Website traffic is starting to decline again although, as the graph shows, yesterday&#8217;s traffic was still the second-highest this month and the decline was relatively small.</strong></p>
<p><img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/heath_ledger_traffic_20080126.gif' alt='Traffic Graph for 2008-01-26 showing traffic starting to decline again' class="imagecentre" /></p>
<p>Two things this morning. One, a look back at how much time this has taken so far, in response to a less-than-polite comment from <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dead_jokes/#comment-10017">Todd</a> and a sensible question from <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dead_jokes/#comment-10021">Crispin</a>. Two, some speculation about how the traffic might go from here.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dead_jokes">The Heath Ledger Experiment</a> is generating tons of interesting data for very little investment in time or money.</strong></p>
<p>Once I&#8217;d heard via <a href="http://twitter.com">Twitter</a> that Ledger was dead, the idea congealed in my mind while running an errand to the shops. After that, Day One went something like this:</p>
<blockquote><table>
<tr>
<th>task</th>
<th>time</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Write web page</td>
<td>5 mins</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Source &#038; prep photo</td>
<td>5 mins</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Figure out Google AdWords</td>
<td>30 mins</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Run initial AdWords campaign</td>
<td>30 mins</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Deal with 1st batch of comments</td>
<td>15 mins</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Run second AdWords campaign</td>
<td>30 mins</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Deal with 2nd batch of comments</td>
<td>15 mins</td>
</tr>
</table>
</blockquote>
<p>The set-up was incredibly fast because, well, it&#8217;s just a matter of writing words and pressing &#8220;Publish&#8221;. Google&#8217;s indexing robots hit my RSS feed hourly or so, so it&#8217;s not long before I&#8217;m indexed.</p>
<p>The most time-consuming part was setting up a Google AdWords account and figuring out how it all worked. Now that I know, next time will be quicker.</p>
<p>That table says it took 2+ hours, but that time was scattered across the working day. I was concentrating on other things, but came back to poke The Experiment &#8212; 5 minutes here, 5 minutes there. With a &#8220;real&#8221; campaign I&#8217;d set it up, let it run for a day, and then come back and analyse it.</p>
<p>You can probably add in another 2 hours&#8217; worth of me talking at people and saying &#8220;Wow! This is so cool!&#8221; about 374 times.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve probably spent 2 hours a day since then poring over the numbers and writing up the analysis. Again, in a &#8220;real&#8221; campaign I&#8217;d have a much more focussed process for evaluating the campaign&#8217;s effectiveness &#8212; and of course acting on the results. As I&#8217;ve said before, my sole aim here was to see how it works, not to specifically generate traffic or produce sales leads.</p>
<p>The potential research papers here, if that&#8217;s not too grand a description, are:</p>
<ol>
<li>Lessons for small businesses wanting to try this for themselves.</li>
<li>How the rise in traffic to the jokes page unfolded, compared with when the story was covered in the media.</li>
<li>How the price of the search terms changed over time.</li>
<li>A linguistic analysis of the jokes and comments themselves.</li>
</ol>
<p>&#8220;Research notes&#8221;, really. Any preferences for what you&#8217;d like to see first?</p>
<p>Now, the future.</p>
<p><strong>I suspect that Friday&#8217;s drop in traffic was a weekly cycle thing, and that traffic will increase again across the weekend.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Traffic was down on Friday generally across some other high-traffic sites we host.</li>
<li>The younger people who are more likely to look for these jokes will have more time on their hands &#8212; both for word-of-mouth referrals and looking for amusements. This is especially true in Australia, where it&#8217;s a long weekend for Australia Day.</li>
</ul>
<p>Any predictions from the floor?</p>

	<h4>5 Random Semi-Related Posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/politics/crikey-oh-no-google-took-a-photo-of-my-house/" title="Crikey: Oh no, Google took a photo of my house! (06 August 2008)">Crikey: Oh no, Google took a photo of my house!</a> (3 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_4/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 4 (27 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 4</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/notes/episode-8-tonight/" title="Episode 8 tonight (07 August 2008)">Episode 8 tonight</a> (3 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/notes/heath_ledger_typo/" title="What sort of weird psychology is this? (24 January 2008)">What sort of weird psychology is this?</a> (2 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/oops_there_goes_privacy/" title="Oops, there goes privacy! So now what? (21 July 2007)">Oops, there goes privacy! So now what?</a> (2 comments)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fiction is not reality</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/heath_ledger_was_an_actor/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/heath_ledger_was_an_actor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Human Nature]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[homophobia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/heath_ledger_was_an_actor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Heath Ledger is notable for being two things at the moment. They are: 1. Not gay. 2. Dead,&#8221; notes Eric TF Bat. &#8220;This hasn&#8217;t stopped our good friends at the Westboro Baptist &#8216;Church&#8217; announcing plans to picket his memorial because he played a gay cowboy in some movie a while back.&#8221; Eric&#8217;s rant says what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;Heath Ledger is notable for being two things at the moment. They are: 1. Not gay. 2. Dead,&#8221; notes Eric TF Bat. &#8220;This hasn&#8217;t stopped our good friends at the Westboro Baptist &#8216;Church&#8217; announcing plans to picket his memorial because he played a gay cowboy in some movie a while back.&#8221; <a href="http://etfb.livejournal.com/100798.html">Eric&#8217;s rant says what needs to be said</a>.</strong></p>

	<h4>5 Random Semi-Related Posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_7/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 7 (30 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 7</a> (1 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_9/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 9 (01 February 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 9</a> (2 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_6/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 6 (29 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 6</a> (3 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/anti_emo_riots_mexico/" title="Anti-Emo riots break out across Mexico (29 March 2008)">Anti-Emo riots break out across Mexico</a> (1 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_4/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 4 (27 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 4</a> (0 comments)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/human-nature/heath_ledger_was_an_actor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 2</title>
		<link>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_2/</link>
		<comments>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, I clearly know nothing about the Internet. Website traffic has actually gone up since yesterday!

Don&#8217;t worry about that number in the corner of the graph. That&#8217;s &#8220;hits&#8221; which includes all the images and little bits of JavaScript in each page.
Using another analysis tool, the number of unique visitors to the site each day (once [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>OK, I clearly know nothing about the Internet. Website traffic has actually gone <em>up</em> since <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_1/">yesterday</a>!</strong></p>
<p><img src='http://stilgherrian.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/heath_ledger_traffic_20080125.gif' alt='Traffic Graph for 2008-01-25 showing continuing rise in traffic yesterday' class="imagecentre" /></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry about that number in the corner of the graph. That&#8217;s &#8220;hits&#8221; which includes all the images and little bits of JavaScript in each page.</p>
<p>Using another analysis tool, the number of unique visitors to the site each day (once search robots and hack attempts are filtered out) has risen from around 500 a day before Corey Worthington Delaney to more than 900 after Mr Socialite graced the world with his presence, to 1402 on Heath Ledger Day 1, to 1807 yesterday.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s going on here?</p>
<p><strong>Well, it&#8217;s certainly all about Heath Ledger.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_dead_jokes/">The Heath Ledger jokes page</a> has received 2618 human visitors in total, which roughly matches the increase in traffic. Originally that traffic was generated by <a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_lessons_1/">advertising on Google</a>. But now it&#8217;s all from what&#8217;s called &#8220;organic search&#8221; &#8212; that is, we&#8217;re turning up naturally in search results rather than paying for it.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the top 10 searches which have brought people here so far this month, showing the number of human visitors and the percentage of search-generated traffic that represents.</p>
<blockquote><table>
<tr>
<th>search phrase</th>
<th>views</th>
<th>% of searches</th>
</tr>
<td>heath ledger jokes</td>
<td>598</td>
<td>12.2 %</td>
<tr>
<td>corey delaney</td>
<td>525</td>
<td>10.7 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger dead jokes</td>
<td>271</td>
<td>5.5 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger</td>
<td>171</td>
<td>3.5 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>jokes about heath ledger</td>
<td>106</td>
<td>2.1 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger death jokes</td>
<td>99</td>
<td>2 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>heath ledger joke</td>
<td>94</td>
<td>1.9 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>corey worthington delaney</td>
<td>91</td>
<td>1.8 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>stilgherrian</td>
<td>85</td>
<td>1.7 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>steve irwin jokes</td>
<td>79</td>
<td>1.6 %</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other phrases</td>
<td>2749</td>
<td>56.4 %</td>
</tr>
</table>
</blockquote>
<p>Now I know that for a few hours I was Google&#8217;s number 4 result for &#8220;heath ledger dead joke&#8221;, but that soon passed as mainstream media mentions of The Joker built up. Just now, I&#8217;ve looked at Google&#8217;s results for &#8220;heath ledger jokes&#8221; and I&#8217;m nowhere in the first 35 pages of results. So I&#8217;m guessing those hits all came from the paid advertising.</p>
<p>[Yes, I should right-justify the numbers in those columns, but you're all smart enough to figure it out for yourselves, I'm sure. I'll do the rest of the tables the same way.]</p>
<p>Looking specifically at the jokes page, here&#8217;s how Google Analytics reckons the visitors found us.</p>
<blockquote><table>
<tr>
<th>source</th>
<th>views</th>
<th>uniques</th>
<th>time on page</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>google</td>
<td>947</td>
<td>449</td>
<td>0:04:01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>(direct)</td>
<td>105</td>
<td>78</td>
<td>0:04:43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>facebook.com</td>
<td>31</td>
<td>26</td>
<td>0:01:16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>google.com.au</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>7</td>
<td>0:02:55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>messaging.myspace.com</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>3</td>
<td>0:13:59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>twitter.com</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>0:03:01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>google.com</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>0:00:00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>aol</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>0:00:00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>tailrank.com</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>0:00:00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>technorati.com</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>0:00:00</td>
</tr>
</table>
</blockquote>
<p>The numbers don&#8217;t match the other charts, so I suspect some people arrived at the home page first, rather than directly to the jokes page.</p>
<p>Some observations about these numbers:</p>
<ul>
<li>People spending 3 or 4 minutes on a web page is pretty respectable. Most websites have people flit in and out much faster. These visitors were engaging with the content!</li>
<li>Posting a link on Facebook was worth it. About a third of my friends clicked through. Are they desperate, or losers?</li>
<li>The 3 unique visitors that arrived via messaging.myspace.com intrigue me, since they spent <em>much</em> longer on site. I wonder if they&#8217;re the same three guys who all came from the same Internet domain, a business in the US, and posted lots and lots of comments? Didn&#8217;t they have any work to do?</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;ll continue poking at the numbers&#8230; more soon.</p>

	<h4>5 Random Semi-Related Posts</h4>
	<ul class="st-related-posts">
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_7/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 7 (30 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 7</a> (1 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/daily_links/daily_links_20080812/" title="Links for 11 August 2008 through 12 August 2008 (13 August 2008)">Links for 11 August 2008 through 12 August 2008</a> (0 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_lessons_1/" title="Lessons from tacky Heath Ledger jokes, Day 1 (24 January 2008)">Lessons from tacky Heath Ledger jokes, Day 1</a> (6 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_6/" title="Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 6 (29 January 2008)">Heath Ledger spikes my website, Day 6</a> (3 comments)</li>
	<li><a href="http://stilgherrian.com/notes/odd_heath_ledger_obituary/" title="Odd obituary for Heath Ledger (29 February 2008)">Odd obituary for Heath Ledger</a> (4 comments)</li>
</ul>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://stilgherrian.com/internet/heath_ledger_spikes_website_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
