Daily Links

Experimental: I’ve finally started exploring the social bookmarking service del.icio.us. Each day, the websites I’ve tagged for future reference are listed here.

Here are the web links I’ve found for 15 May 2008, posted automatically.

Read the rest of this entry »

Stilgherrian’s links for 10 May 2008 through 12 May 2008, generated almost-automatically:

Read the rest of this entry »

Here are the web links I’ve found for 07 May 2008, posted automatically.

Read the rest of this entry »

Here are the web links I’ve found for 06 May 2008, posted automatically.

Read the rest of this entry »

My links for 02 May 2008 through 03 May 2008: one funny, one serious, and one combining both moods.

Read the rest of this entry »

Here are the web links I’ve found over the last few days, posted a bit later than I’d intended. Cope.

Read the rest of this entry »

My interwebby links for 27 April 2008 through 28 April 2008, according to UTC time, apparently:

Read the rest of this entry »

I’ve decided to have another go at publishing the links I find online. So, thanks to del.icio.us and some mild semi-automation, here’s today’s batch.

Read the rest of this entry »

I’m starting to think that my “here’s what I’ve found” items should move from Twitter to Del.icio.us or maybe even Tumblr [no account there yet, will explore soon] and just be summarised here daily. Then Twitter can be just the day-to-day status stuff — which needn’t be archived here at all, but maybe elsewhere.

Are you OK with that one, Mat F?

There seems to be a surge in “RSS aggregator” products like FriendFeed to create a unified “life stream”. But the more I think about it, the more I think “one stream that contains everything” is wrong. It might be fine for archiving — for your needs. But what about those following you? Dumping everything into a single sewer of undifferentiated crap seems to throw the burden of understanding you onto you audience. And all successful media creation is about what the audience wants — no matter what the scale.

It’s better, I think, to separate out the threads into different streams. People can subscribe to the combination they want. And they can choose to view them in the aggregator of their choice.

Business contacts get your business posts. Family and friends get the status reports about your lunch. A select few choose to view the reports of your illicit camel sex. where they want them, when they want them.

Well, that’s what I think today, anyway. What do you think?

« Older entries