-
Pingback from Twitted by WoollyMittens on 03 July 2009 at 6:02 pm
-
You unravel it in the right order. Things like mobile phones need no wires and simple infrastructure. But they still need electricity, but only a small amount. You start with a few people, like the local business man who needs to call the market in the next town to sell some farm goods. You need the basics, like water, roads, sewerage. Later you need computers. If you give the kids computers to learn, the smart ones will leave and go and live overseas. It is one of the tragedies of these places. But some will stay and make things better. The question is: how will computers make things better for people in this environment. If you give them computers, some will work it out. But you need lower tech to start with. Like you said, there is so much infrastructure we take for granted that makes the whole thing work.
Another thing is not to think of it as income earning, but change creating. If people can interact with the outside world, some will see beyond where they are and start making a change. It is these people you need to find and nurture.
Have a look at other places that are further along the transition. When we went to this village in China in 1992, there was no running water. The houses we went into had maybe two pieces of furniture in the lounge. The buildings were 99% mud brick. But now, they are less than 50% mud brick, they have better roads, electricity, TV, and little trucks and cars. That is in 17 years.
-
Yewenyi’s comments are correct and I like the idea of change creating rather than income earning.
As Yewenyi would know China’s success in enabling people to escape poverty is largely due to large rates of equitable economic growth, which has enabled larger numbers of Chinese to share in the countries prosperity rather than a select few which tragically happens in most developing and under developed countries.
There are still massive social problems in China but in 25 words or less my take on the two major reasons for China’s success is the increased ability of the State to provide essential services to its people, for example health and education, whilst also providing the required level of regulatory oversight to enable a robust private sector to be the engine of economic growth.
As many have noted the key ingredient missing in China is a robust and active civil society, eg academia, NGOs, media, faith based organizations, which is able to lobby the government to be accountable to its people and provide the appropriate environment for people to claim their human rights.
For me, human rights has to include civil and political rights in addition to economic, social and cultural rights. This combination is essential for the development of a fair, just, equitable and prosperous society and this is the approach that we at ActionAid take in all of our work.
I’m looking forward to seeing where this debate goes and to Stil’s thoughts after he’s had time to digest everything that he’s seen in the last week or so.
Cheers,
Archie
-
Pingback from Stilgherrian · Unreliable Tanzania 1: Fatigue on 13 July 2009 at 10:05 pm
-
Pingback from Stilgherrian · Unreliable Tanzania 2: Nets on 17 July 2009 at 1:32 pm



Crikey
Delicious
Dopplr
Facebook
Flickr
LinkedIn
newmatilda.com
Patch Monday
Qik
Stilgherrian Live (Ustream)
The Drum (ABC)
Twitter
Viddler
6 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link: http://stilgherrian.com/toto/the-poverty-web/trackback/